Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



Hold Off on Buying Intel

Don't let it get away!

Keep track of the stocks that matter to you.

Help yourself with the Fool's FREE and easy new watchlist service today.

The world is changing faster than Intel (NASDAQ: INTC  ) can. Smartphones and tablets have seen explosive rates of adoption, yet Intel's technology remains largely stuck inside the PC. This is a bit problematic, considering that mobile computing is threatening to extend the replacement cycle of PCs, a rate that means everything to the industry. Should users decide to extend the typical four-year life of their PCs by just one year, it would shrink the PC industry by 20%.

If this trend continues, Intel likely only has a few years left before mobile computing seriously threatens its core PC business. In other words, it's likely in Intel's best interest to make a big splash in mobile computing sooner rather than later. To that end, Intel will be banking on its technologically superior, leading-edge capacity to carry the weight of its mobile ambitions.

Filling the void
When Intel developed its x86 architecture, raw computing power was the primary objective. You can think of Intel's x86 architecture as the equivalent of an American-made muscle car of the 1960s -- a powerful, yet inefficient gas guzzler. This is contrary to chips based on ARM Holdings' (NASDAQ: ARMH  ) architecture, which are more like your eco-friendly fuel-efficient vehicles.

As you can imagine, Intel's approach to processors hasn't exactly been a great fit in the age of smartphones and tablets, which spend the majority of their lives running on battery power. As a result, ARM designs have become the de facto standard in mobile computing while Intel continues to shrink its x86 architecture so it runs on less energy. Thankfully, Intel has far superior foundries to work with than what Taiwan Semiconductors can offer to ARM chip makers.

To that end, Intel will be the first to market with a 22-nanometer processor specifically meant for tablet computing, a full generation ahead of the ARM competition. Intel's Bay Trail processor is likely to be a compelling tablet processor because it effectively paves the way for $200 tablets running the full version of Microsoft Windows 8. Against the sea of low-cost Google Android tablets, a $200 Windows 8 tablet could be very well received and help improve the negative perceptions surrounding Windows 8.

Unfortunately, it's more complicated for Intel than launching a compelling product or two.

A catch-22
Given the more competitive landscape of mobile computing, Intel must be willing to accept a lower average selling price than it has grown accustomed to in the PC world.

Based on my estimations, which are modeled off of Qualcomm's (NASDAQ: QCOM  ) semiconductor business, Intel would need to sell about five smartphone processors to replace the revenue from one PC sale. Assuming Intel sold its smartphone chips for the same $22.03 average selling price that Qualcomm commanded over the last four quarters, and Intel managed to sell all 356 million smartphone processors in its addressable market, it would be worth about $7.8 billion in revenue. On the tablet side, I've modeled Intel's current addressable market to be worth somewhere in the neighborhood of $1.6 billion to $2 billion in revenue.

Combined, we're talking about a roughly $10 billion maximum opportunity for a company that earned over $53 billion in revenue last year. Now, this is before taking into account any cannibalization mobile computing may continue to have on Intel's existing business. Should the PC industry experience a prolonged replacement cycle, it's clear that Intel may face some serious revenue pressure down the road. Not to mention, Intel's underlying profitability may also be at risk because we don't know how Intel will maintain its historically rich gross profit margins as it shifts toward a model that deals with the reality of significantly lower average selling prices.

Low replacement value
Although Intel possesses the most technologically advanced semiconductor foundries on the planet, it's becoming apparent that this factor might not matter as much as once thought. Currently, there's a huge disconnect between Intel's historical earnings and what it could potentially earn as it taps into new markets.

However, the tablet and smartphone markets are both expected to continue growing in the strong double-digits in the coming years. By the end of 2017, the tablet market is expected to reach 350 million annual shipments, about the current size of the PC market today. This growth could help expand Intel's $10 billion addressable market to a far larger figure. Still, the question of profitability remains a bit of a wild card, given the reality that Intel's average selling prices are poised to decline.

For these reasons, shares trade at a 35% discount to the S&P 500, indicating investors' lack of conviction and visibility as Intel diversifies away from the shrinking PC market. In hindsight, I probably shouldn't have been tempted by Intel's extreme value when I purchased shares over a year ago.

When it comes to dominating markets, it doesn't get much better than Intel's position in the PC microprocessor arena. However, that market is maturing, and Intel finds itself in a precarious situation longer term if it doesn't find new avenues for growth. In this premium research report on Intel, our analyst runs through all of the key topics investors should understand about the chip giant. Click here now to learn more.

Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (3)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 30, 2013, at 11:18 PM, stretcho44 wrote:

    "You can think of Intel's x86 architecture as the equivalent of an American-made muscle car of the 1960s -- a powerful, yet inefficient gas guzzler. This is contrary to chips based on ARM Holdings' architecture, which are more like your eco-friendly fuel-efficient vehicles."


    Please look over these two articles that show TODAY'S Intel ATOM chip as fast as ARM and consume similar power to ARM. Your performance versus power consumption argument is bogus.

    There are lots of nice pictures and they are relatively current (2013).

    Much of your "opinion masquerading as fact" is just wrong.

    The x86 Power Myth Busted: In-Depth Clover Trail Power Analysis

    The ARM vs x86 Wars Have Begun: In-Depth Power Analysis of Atom, Krait & Cortex A15

  • Report this Comment On May 01, 2013, at 3:14 AM, doawithlife wrote:

    *plugs in technology company* will see its market dwindle in the coming years. People have no need to replace their TV, phone, computer, whatever.

    Same thing happened with electricity. Our economy busts as everyone spends money on the new tech. People lose jobs as the technology replaces them. Our government fails because it is having a hard time governing the new economy. In the end we learned our lesson and "Public Utilities Holding Company Act" was passed. Prices dropped, all were happy, except the stock holders.

    This is a different beast with the same story. Instead of food being tied in, we have housing and banking tied into our computer boom. This entire new world economy takes getting use to and we always pay a premium for new technologies. The world adapts and prices drop and so do stocks.

    How is Sony doing? Apple? AoL?

    Eventually we will see other tech stocks drop off. Are we all going to run around like chickens with our heads cut off. Or do we adapt and realize the money moved to quantum technologies and new energy.

    On that note, you missed one big point. Intel isn't just a CPU company anymore, they haven't been for ten years. Remember the SSD revolution, you can thank Intel for that. Intel Mobo's they got that. Did they just start really focusing on video graphics, yup. Is Intel continuing to adapt? yup. Are they staying still as they watch their market crumble? nope.

    Do they already make money off virtually every phone or tablet? yeah.

    Only reason Intel has kept the value they have is because they continue to move. Intel North Bridge and South Bridge chip sets. Intel's Hyper threading. Graphics chips. Cpu's. Flash memory. etc. etc. They should totally stop here.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2396674, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/28/2016 8:25:19 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,339.24 110.94 0.61%
S&P 500 2,171.37 11.44 0.53%
NASD 5,318.55 12.84 0.24%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

9/28/2016 4:00 PM
INTC $37.44 Up +0.26 +0.70%
Intel CAPS Rating: ****
ARMH $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
ARM Holdings CAPS Rating: ***
GOOGL $810.06 Down -0.67 -0.08%
Alphabet (A shares… CAPS Rating: *****
MSFT $58.03 Up +0.08 +0.14%
Microsoft CAPS Rating: ****
QCOM $63.45 Up +0.14 +0.22%
Qualcomm CAPS Rating: ****
TSM $30.33 Down -0.07 -0.23%
Taiwan Semiconduct… CAPS Rating: ****