Why Bank of America and Wells Fargo Aren't Plummeting Today

U.S. stocks achieved another record high yesterday, and they opened up again this morning, with the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC  ) and the narrower, price-weighted Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES: ^DJI  ) up 0.3% each at 10:05 a.m. EDT. Buoyant stock markets are a global phenomenon: MSCI's global index, which includes 45 countries, surpassed its June 2008 high today, while Germany's DAX hit an all-time high.

Banks: A margin of safety
For New York attorneys general, banks are the gift that keep on giving: They always provide an easy "win" for a politician who wants to burnish his populist credentials -- never more so than in the wake of the credit crisis, when bankers have few friends. (Though, to be fair, banks have made themselves easy targets with their egregious behavior.)

Now, NY Attorney General Eric Schneiderman is going back to the well. He intends to sue Bank of America (NYSE: BAC  ) and Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC  ) for violating rules regarding loan modifications. This is no longer a matter of transgressions that occurred during the frenzy of the credit and housing bubble or the pandemonium of the immediate crisis that followed; Schneiderman alleges that the organizations did not respect the terms of the $25 billion global settlement regulators finalized with banks in February 2012.

In principle, this is horrendous news for shareholders of the largest U.S. lenders, as it tends to reveal a specter of open-ended legal liabilities haunting banks. That uncertainty is one of the factors that explains how the shares of three of the four largest banks -- Bank of America, Citigroup and JPMorgan Chase -- continue to trade below their book values. However, a funny thing happened on the way to the market: The two banks fingered by Schneiderman aren't getting hammered, as some had expected. Wells Fargo is up moderately, while B of A has suffered a modest 0.4% loss.

This doesn't mean a potential lawsuit isn't bad news for these banks. While I'm always wary of interpreting short-term price movements, I think that as banks work through liabilities, the market is becoming accustomed to them. Furthermore, bank valuations had been so depressed that the costs, once known, turn out to be less daunting than the uncertainty investors associated with them. In other words, valuations had more than discounted these risks; consequently, shares don't react negatively once the news is out. I believe the shares of these banks continue to offer investors a margin of safety.

Bank of America's stock doubled in 2012. Is there more yet to come? With significant challenges still ahead, it's critical to have a solid understanding of this megabank before adding it to your portfolio. In The Motley Fool's premium research report on B of A, analysts Anand Chokkavelu and Matt Koppenheffer lift the veil on the bank's operations, detailing three reasons to buy and three reasons to sell. Click here now to claim your copy.


Read/Post Comments (0) | Recommend This Article (5)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

DocumentId: 2413695, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/23/2014 12:35:48 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement