Remembering Buffett's Sweetheart Bank of America Deal

Recently, The Motley Fool had five analysts identify Warren Buffett's best investment. I expected that one of the five would identify Buffett's 2011 deal with Bank of America (NYSE: BAC  ) -- a $5 billion infusion when the bank and market needed it. However, because two of my colleagues identified the deal as the best, I decided that I should take a deeper look at the deal that some people may have forgotten about, especially with all the daily noise that surrounds a stock like Bank of America.

A quick rundown of the deal
In case you are unaware or simply forgot, Buffett, using the bullet-proof balance sheet of Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-A  ) (NYSE: BRK-B  ) , provided Bank of America with $5 billion in August 2011. Buffett received some special preferred shares, as well as warrants to purchase B of A common shares. These warrants are redeemable at any time until 2021, allowing Berkshire to purchase 700 million shares of Bank of America at around $7.14 a share.

What I found interesting, and must have missed when the deal was announced almost two years ago, is that the preferred stock received by Berkshire is cumulative, meaning that if the dividend does not get paid for some reason, the amount continues to accrue until all past-due dividends are paid. By receiving these shares, Buffett ensured that Berkshire would be covered should Bank of America's performance suffer dramatically. Pretty shrewd move if you ask me.

A sweetheart deal
The deal that Buffett received is truly a deal ordinary investors will never see. Part of this is because of the capital required. I don't know about you, but I don't have ready access to $5 billion. However, it's not like Buffett is the only person out there with access to this kind of money, so the reason behind the deal extends beyond available capital.

Perhaps more important than the money is the stature afforded to Buffett because of his success at Berkshire Hathaway and his history of great capital allocation. Similar deals with Goldman Sachs and General Electric provided a template for Buffett to work with Bank of America and CEO Brian Moynihan. In its acquisition of Heinz, in addition to the equity stake in the company, Berkshire received preferred shares that will pay a 9% dividend each year, further illustrating Buffett's love of preferred shares.

What about B of A shareholders?
It's great that Buffett got this great deal, but what will it mean for B of A shareholders when Berkshire redeems its warrants? In the short term, earnings per share would decline because of 700 million new shares added to the shares outstanding, which would probably affect the share price. As Bank of America continues to rise above the strike price for the warrants, it may be time for Moynihan and company to try to get Berkshire to redeem sooner rather than later.

A template to open discussions could be Berkshire's recent deal with Goldman Sachs regarding similar warrants. Instead of executing the full value of the warrants and walking away with a 9% stake in the investment bank, both parties renegotiated the deal, and Berkshire will instead receive shares corresponding to the gain since the warrants were written.

With a current paper gain of $3.5 billion with its B of A warrants, a similar deal would net Berkshire almost 290 million sharesat today's price, a much more manageable chunk than the original 700 million. While I don't think Berkshire would necessarily renegotiate this deal with over eight years remaining, it might be in the best interest of B of A shareholders for Moynihan to at least approach Buffett and company with an offer. 

With so much of the financial industry getting bad press these days, it may be a greedy when others are fearful moment. Not surprisingly, some of Warren Buffett's biggest investments are in the space. In the Motley Fool's free report, The Stocks Only the Smartest Investors Are Buying, you can learn about a small, under-the-radar bank that's too tiny for Buffett's billions. Too bad, because it has better operating metrics than his favorites. Just click here to keep reading.


Read/Post Comments (5) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 09, 2013, at 12:46 PM, NeedaClue7 wrote:

    Good article, and I agree with the premise although I would be inclined to give honorable mention to the derivative instrument he wrote, taking several billion dollars against the major indices falling from their 2008 lows.

    One point often missed regarding Buffett's preferred stock deals with BoA, GE and Goldman is that the dividends paid on the preferred are 70% exempt from taxation when received by Berkshire. Sweet deals indeed!

  • Report this Comment On May 09, 2013, at 3:19 PM, yaovk wrote:

    The republicans must protect the rich by making them richer by allowing more leeway for the rich and corporations to rig the markets and by making sure there are more loopholes for them to avoid taxes and no tax increase for them. Let the victimized dumb and poor ordinary citizens keep on voting for the GOP so they can rejoice how rich a person can make it in America.

  • Report this Comment On May 09, 2013, at 4:02 PM, TrackMagicFormul wrote:

    "What I found interesting, and must have missed when the deal was announced almost two years ago, is that the preferred stock received by Berkshire is cumulative, meaning that if the dividend does not get paid for some reason, the amount continues to accrue until all past-due dividends are paid."

    You got me scratching my head here. I thought the dividends on all preferred shares is cumulative. That's why they are "preferred", i.e. senior to "common" stock, whose dividends don't get paid until all preferred dividend payments are met.

  • Report this Comment On May 10, 2013, at 3:13 AM, XMFTheGuruEbby wrote:

    TrackMagicFormul,

    I understand your confusion, as I thought the same thing, but my research showed otherwise.

    While you are correct that preferred shares have precedence over common shares when it comes to dividends, it could be possible for a company to not declare even preferred dividends, like if the company was liquidating or performed so poorly that it had no excess cash. In that event, only bondholders would be paid.

    Thanks for reading!

    Robert

  • Report this Comment On May 10, 2013, at 7:02 PM, FooLawson wrote:

    @ TrackMagicFormul

    you are correct

    they are called Dividends in Arreaers,

    but of course like TMFGuruEbby said,

    A company has the option to declare a dividend or not,

    Common stocks don't accrue,

    This also would mean Buffet doesn't have voting shares (only Common), even though I'm plenty sure he has a heavy leverage on them.

    Foolishly,

    FooLawson

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 2404641, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 7/31/2014 8:59:10 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement