Contrary to popular belief, Time Warner (NYSE:TWX) doesn't need to make HBO GO a standalone subscription service to profit from hits such as Game of Thrones and True Blood.

Allowing current-season addicts to purchase season passes via Apple's (NASDAQ:AAPL) iTunes or Amazon.com's (NASDAQ:AMZN) Instant Video could add millions in new revenue without damaging Warner's relationships with cable operators.

A game of cash and carry
Fools know I've been critical of HBO GO. Not because the app isn't useful. Far from it. The problem is one of synchronicity: HBO GO only works on tablets and smartphones. You can't start an episode on your TV, move to your computer, and then move to a tablet without losing your place. HBO badly lags Netflix in this area.

Meanwhile, a look at Warner's most recent 10-K annual report shows the company's Networks segment generated $8.67 billion in revenue. HBO has 114 million subscribers worldwide. Thus, it's likely Warner receives at least $76 a year, or $6 per month, from each HBO cable subscriber.

What would happen to that stream if Warner agreed to let Apple and Amazon sell current-season passes? Consider what we know about Game of Thrones and True Blood, which returns to HBO for a sixth season on June 16:

  • More than 17 million on Facebook say they "like" these shows.

  • Each show attracts more than 4.5 million viewers regularly.

  • Fans illegally downloaded 1 million copies of the Game of Thrones Season 3 premiere.

  • A Twitter campaign in which customers were asked what they'd spend monthly for a distinct HBO GO service generated more than 163,000 responses within 48 hours.

Game Of Thrones Image V

Emilia Clarke as Daenerys Targaryen, the "Mother of Dragons." Photo credit: HBO.

As I see it, HBO's viewing restrictions limit the potential audience for both GoT and True Blood.

Going a step further, let's say those 1 million downloaders reflect the number of current HBO subscribers who would flee to iTunes or Amazon Instant Video for their fix. What would they pay? Several participating in the #takemymoneyhbo Twitter campaign named $15 to $20 a month as a fair price for HBO GO as a standalone service.

My guess is a plurality of this same group would be willing to commit $180 to $240 for current-season downloads priced at a premium cable operators could (grudgingly) accept. If I'm right, HBO would give up $76 million to cord-cutters for the chance to earn at least twice that from downloaders.

Think I'm crazy? Let's put this idea to a vote.

Let's say HBO were to decide to sell Season 4 passes of Game of Thrones for $59.99 each ahead of next year's premiere, or $17 more than AMC Networks (NASDAQ:AMCX) currently demands for its hit The Walking Dead. Would you buy? Why or why not?

Please mark your selection in the poll below, and then leave a comment to let us know which HBO shows you'd most want to see made available for current season download.

Fool contributor Tim Beyers is a member of the Motley Fool Rule Breakers stock-picking team and the Motley Fool Supernova Odyssey I mission. He owned shares of Apple, Netflix, and Time Warner at the time of publication. He was also long January 2014 $50 Netflix call options. Check out Tim's Web home and portfolio holdings, or connect with him on Google+Tumblr, or Twitter, where he goes by @milehighfool. You can also get his insights delivered directly to your RSS reader.

The Motley Fool recommends Amazon.com, AMC Networks, Apple, Facebook, and Netflix and owns shares of Amazon.com, Apple, Facebook, and Netflix. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.