Is Obama's Home State Balking at Obamacare?

The first full week in June ended with Illinois lawmakers again failing to send Gov. Pat Quinn a bill outlining a state-run marketplace to sell health insurance in accordance with the Affordable Care Act, more commonly known as Obamacare. While the marketplace will still open for business later this fall, the control of the marketplace for Illinois residents is the issue in question. The governor wishes to partner with the federal government for 2014, but he had hoped that the state would take control for 2015 and beyond. If some resolution isn't reached quickly, control will probably remain in federal hands for quite some time.

Given the interplay between federal- and state-run marketplaces, it's unclear what impact this development -- and those like it in other states -- will have on the major health-insurance providers, but most have already made clear that they'll enter a limited number of markets. That outcome could ultimately mean that states relying on the centralized federal option will be able to offer more choices, simply because the insurance companies aren't racing to join state systems. When these markets go live in October, the participation of the major players will probably have a significant impact on the respective stocks.

The position of the companies
According to a recent story from Reuters, the largest insurance companies have been cagey about their interest in becoming deeply involved with Obamacare marketplaces. Here's a summary.

  • WellPoint (NYSE: WLP  ) : The insurer that runs 14 Blue Cross Blue Shield state operations said it will join in those states, but it has no specific plans to extend its reach into new markets.
  • UnitedHealth Group (NYSE: UNH  ) : The country's largest insurer has remained especially vague on the number of systems in would participate in -- placing the number somewhere between 10 and 25. Interestingly, the company is not likely to participate in its home state of Minnesota, because for-profit insurers are not permitted there. Minnesota offers an example of how each of the different states poses unique issues.
  • Aetna (NYSE: AET  ) : The insurer reported submitting 14 applications, but like WellPoint, it said it had no plans to use the exchanges as a vehicle for expansion or a "land grab."
  • Cigna (NYSE: CI  ) : Fourteen seems to be the magic number for applications, as this insurer also reports that it will be involved in that many states. While Cigna is also trading near its own 52-week high, the stock offers a dividend yield of only 0.10%. Given the significant run the overall market has experienced, the downside protection from other options is preferable.

Central to the concerns of all of these companies is ongoing uncertainty over how many plans they'll be allowed to offer, what pricing parameters may be placed on pricing and benefits, and what costs may be involved in participating in various systems. The appeal for the states of creating their own exchanges is that they'll then be able to set more of the rules that the insurers must abide by and honor.

While the government believes that the exchanges offer the appeal of lower administrative cost to the companies, the limitations are hard to fully predict until the systems go live. One obvious issue for the system is that states that currently have very limited offerings may not see any significant uptick in options. While an obvious solution would seem to include offering all options of the federally run site to residents of all states that participate therein, the regulations and limitations that govern the industry would mean another major overhaul to the law to allow that situation to occur.

The Illinois situation
The wrangling afoot in Illinois seems to be typical of many states, including those seen to be the most supportive of President Obama. The battle lines in the Illinois State Legislature are being drawn between those who want a state-run system and the influence of the insurance companies. Illinois has already passed another important part of the law, in the form of an expansion of Medicaid to cover the bulk of low-income individuals without insurance; the U.S. Supreme Court made the option in an earlier decision. Ultimately the path of Illinois is more symbolic than critical to Obamacare, but it will probably continue to get attention, since it's the president's home state.

The investment impact
The health-care industry as a whole has performed strongly this year, with each of the aforementioned companies outperforming the S&P 500 year to date.

WLP Chart

Source: YCharts.

WellPoint is up about 30% and is trading just below its 52-week high, suggesting that the market has little concern over the company's stance toward the new law. UnitedHealth offers a similar dividend yield at 1.8% but has been the laggard of the group thus far this year. While U.S. Treasury rates have increased somewhat, the 1.9% dividend yield is still an attractive sweetener for either of these stocks.

Aetna, which is also up about 30% this year, is pushing its own model of care, called Patient-Centered Medical Homes. Under the model, a team of physicians is more actively involved with patients to take a proactive approach and better address ongoing needs. The approach seems to have potential and could give Aetna an alternative edge.

While Cigna is the second best performing stock of the group, it offers a dividend yield of only 0.10%. It's also the most expensive on a price-to-earnings basis, trading near 15.5, while its peers are all below 13, and as low as 9.3 for WellPoint. Given the significant run the overall market has experienced, the downside protection offered by other options is preferable to Cigna.

Generally, while health insurers have been strong this year, the real success of Obamacare in driving new customers to each of these companies will probably drive performance later in the year. The interplay between federal and state control could ultimately prove costly to these companies, but until the first deadlines passes, shifts may occur that change the landscape. Critical factors to watch will include the number of new policies generated by the law and the relative profitability -- should a disparity exist -- between state- and federal-run exchanges.

When President Obama was re-elected, shares of UnitedHealth and other health insurers fell immediately. Is Obamacare a death knell for health insurers, or is the market missing out on some of the opportunities the law presents? In this brand-new premium report on UnitedHealth, The Motley Fool takes a long-term view, homing in on prospects for UnitedHealth in an Obamacare world. So don't miss out -- simply click here now to claim your copy today.


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 11, 2013, at 10:26 PM, sagehopper wrote:

    Too late, guys. You helped get him into office. We all lose, along with you.

  • Report this Comment On June 12, 2013, at 12:15 AM, stevor86 wrote:

    Illinois was so glad to get rid of o'bama so why would they want any remnant of him and his stench?

  • Report this Comment On June 12, 2013, at 3:45 AM, zardoz333 wrote:

    i didn't know Kenya had a problem with it

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 2484255, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/20/2014 12:42:28 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement