Is Chesapeake's New CEO Overpaid?

Chesapeake Energy (NYSE: CHK  ) , the Oklahoma City-based oil and gas producer, recently got a new CEO. After months of searching for Aubrey McClendon's replacement, the company chose Robert Douglas ("Doug") Lawler, who previously led Anadarko Petroleum's (NYSE: APC  ) successful international and deepwater business, as chief executive.

His appointment to the top position at Chesapeake was generally well received, with most analysts expressing optimism about his ability to lead the company forward as it embarks on what it hopes will be a new era of value realization and shareholder returns.

But while there's not much doubt about Lawler's experience and abilities, is Chesapeake paying him too much?

A generous pay package
According to a recent SEC filing, Lawler's pay package at Chesapeake this year will be at least $22 million. He will receive a base annual salary of $1.25 million, a prorated cash bonus of at least $800,000, and an additional signing bonus of $4.5 million, of which $2 million will be awarded in cash and $2.5 million in stock awards. And that's not all.  

He'll receive $10.5 million in shares, vested in equal installments over three years, as well as an additional $5 million in stock awards to compensate for the loss of his pension from his previous employer Anadarko. Moreover, if he stays on as chief executive for five years, he'll get another $5 million worth of shares. And if he achieves his bonus targets, he stands to make even more.

Not only is Lawler's total compensation more than Chesapeake's former CEO got paid last year, it's also noticeably more than the chief executives of other energy companies with similar market capitalizations.

Comparing CEO compensations
Last year, McClendon received a base salary of $975,000 and a total compensation of $16.9 million. Meanwhile, chief executives at Encana (NYSE: ECA  ) and Southwestern Energy (NYSE: SWN  ) , two natural gas producers with very similar market capitalizations, had substantially smaller pay packages last year.

Randall K. Eresman, Encana's former CEO, received $7.2 million in compensation for heading up a company with a roughly $13 billion market cap, only slightly less than Chesapeake's $13.5 billion, while Steve Mueller, CEO of Southwestern Energy, which has a market cap of just under $13 billion, got about $5.6 million.

Meanwhile, John Richels of Devon Energy (NYSE: DVN  ) , an energy producer with a market cap of nearly $22.5 billion, took home $12.8 million last year, not including the rise in the value of his pension. Even Ryan Lance, who heads up ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP  ) , which has a market cap more than five times that of Chesapeake's, only took home $19.3 million last year.

In fact, Lawler's $22 million package is even more than the $20.8 million SandRidge's (NYSE: SD  ) CEO Tom Ward – who has come under heavy fire for his alleged failings in leading the company he founded – took home last year. Despite SandRidge's lackluster earnings growth and dismal stock performance, Ward got a total compensation of $25.2 million in 2011, which placed him among the highest-paid energy CEOs that year. 

Is Lawler overpaid?
Though compensation comparisons may suggest otherwise, the generous pay package offered to Lawler may simply reflect how difficult it has been for Chesapeake to find someone to replace McClendon.

Clearly, he left the company in a pretty precarious position, with a worryingly high level of long-term debt and a sizable cash flow shortfall. To combat these problems, Chesapeake has been forced to sell a ton of assets in a short period of time. Low natural gas prices and disappointing prices for some of its assets have further exacerbated the company's woes.

Given this backdrop, the $2 million cash signing bonus and $12.5 million of shares awarded to Lawler may have been necessary to attract the caliber of executive the company needs to help it bounce back, especially after earlier talks between the company and a promising candidate quickly fizzled out.

With Lawler at the helm, will Chesapeake manage to meet its oil production target and boost cash flow? Or will it languish under the weight of its heavy debt load? To help answer that question and to learn more about Chesapeake and its enormous potential, you're invited to check out The Motley Fool's brand-new premium report on the company. Simply click here now to access your copy and, as an added bonus, you'll receive a full year of key updates and expert guidance as news continues to develop.


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (10)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 19, 2013, at 12:58 PM, sta63 wrote:

    Well yes as a shareholder he overpaid. Mr. Aubrey McClendon started Chesapeake from ground up and put lots of his sweat and personal money to make Chesapeake a great company. Shareholders and Investors such as I Chan Investors pushed Aubrey to resign and complain that he made too much money.

    The new CEO is being compensated way too much than Aubrey McClendon was earning. The former CEO founded the company, pushed the CNG concept to become a common name, and to make America energy independent. And creating a demand for natural gas and creating thousands of jobs across our nation.

    The new CEO has not had any personal investor in Chesapeake success like Aubrey McClendon. I think it would be well wise to pass some of his compensation to the employees that have been part of the company’s. success.

  • Report this Comment On June 25, 2013, at 6:49 AM, shirtbrigade wrote:

    Socialism has gained a lot of traction in recent years. Just remember, you get what you pay for. He can be fired and replaced if he fails to perform to his level of pay. The world wants leaders to create, but out of the same mouth, we want them to do it for free. So why is the world in a recession heading to a great, monumental depression?

  • Report this Comment On September 23, 2013, at 10:35 AM, Kyle40574 wrote:

    laying off 2000+ employees and cutting cost so the xtra money can go to the new CEO?? Yes, Lawler is overpaid!!

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 2495846, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/21/2014 3:38:18 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement