Does Intel No Longer Love the Desktop?

Thanks to the prolific rise of smartphones and tablets, the writing has been on the wall for PC makers for quite some time. It's gotten to the point where Intel (NASDAQ: INTC  ) has completely shifted its long-term strategy toward gaining significant market share in mobile computing. To that end, Intel Haswell was born, the company's fourth-generation "Core" family processor.

For portable computing applications, there's no denying Haswell's technological prowess. Devices powered by Haswell can realistically expect to see around a 50% improvement in battery life from previous generation portables, assuming all else is equal. Thanks to Haswell, Apple was able to increase its 13-inch MacBook Air battery life from seven to 12 hours.

Although the trade-off between endurance over performance is an effective approach for portable PCs to make gains against mobile computing, it doesn't necessarily translate to the desktop, which is typically more focused on raw computing power.

Thankfully, even with Haswell's more mobile-friendly design, desktop users won't be disappointed. According to Gordon Mah Ung of MaximumPC, Haswell in the desktop "for the most part" outperformed its Ivy Bridge predecessor between 8% and 15%, depending on the metric. In other words, the desktop market can rest assured that the company's long-term strategy of emphasizing mobile computing won't necessarily detract from desktop performance boosts.

The bigger picture
Between desktops and portable PCs, the desktop remains the weakest link. Despite IDC anticipating total worldwide PC shipments will increase between 2013 and 2017 by nearly 4%, the firm expects desktop shipments will decline by about 8%. That said, Intel's focus on mobile computing solutions is a much safer long-term bet than maintaining a core emphasis on desktop computing. Not to mention, the company has proven it can put its efforts toward mobile without neglecting the desktop market.

In the end, it's the world that's falling out of love with desktops -- not Intel.

It's incredible to think just how much of our digital and technological lives are almost entirely shaped and molded by just a handful of companies. Find out "Who Will Win the War Between the 5 Biggest Tech Stocks?" in The Motley Fool's latest free report, which details the knock-down, drag-out battle being waged by the five kings of tech. Click here to keep reading.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 29, 2013, at 1:25 AM, doawithlife wrote:

    I personally can't wait for generation 2 of PC tablets.

    3.5 hours playing PC games (45% brightness) on a Surface Pro is ok, but not stellar. It would be nice to get 4.5 hours of game playing and be able to turn the brightness up to 60%~. Even better when gen 3 comes out. Hope we hit 6 hours of game playing then.

    (playing the same games, the Macbook air gets about 4.5 hours already. So their improvement will be even better)

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2516351, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/23/2014 12:17:04 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement