ExxonMobil Stock Is Going Nowhere

No two ways about it: ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM  ) has disappointed investors mightily this past year.

The mere 7% rise in price in the world's premier "oil stock" works out to less than half the gains seen elsewhere on the S&P 500. It's risen less than half as high as archrival Chevron (NYSE: CVX  ) . Indeed, ExxonMobil stock has even underperformed BP (NYSE: BP  ) -- and last I heard, Exxon hasn't blown up any gulf oil platforms lately.

But why is Exxon underperforming, and why might its laggard performance continue for longer than investors expect? Three reasons.

Exxon costs too much
When you stack up Exxon stock against its somewhat smaller rivals, it's immediately clear that Exxon shares cost more than its peers. Valued on forward earnings, Exxon shares sell for a 15% premium to Chevron's, and cost a whopping 51% more than BP.

The overvaluation is apparent, too, when valuing the shares on trailing earnings, where Exxon's 9.2 P/E ratio tops Chevron's 8.9 and sells for a 53% premium to the 6 P/E at BP.

Exxon grows too slow ...
Now, this higher P/E ratio might be forgivable if Exxon was an obviously superior stock, with obviously brighter prospects than its peers. It's not. Indeed, as this next chart shows, Exxon's projected earnings growth rate over the next five years isn't very much better than what's expected out of Chevron -- and lags BP's projected pace quite badly.

... and it's been growing slow for quite some time
Can we trust these analyst estimates to be accurate? Maybe not entirely. Crystal balls being both expensive, and notoriously hard to read, it's certainly possible the analysts' projected growth rates for BP, Chevron, and Exxon might be off by a point or two.

That said, it's worth pointing out that the projections for the next five years' earnings do line up pretty well with what we've already seen in these companies' sales trends over the past five years.

So if past is prelude, it's not all that hard to believe that the biggest oil company in the world might struggle to get even bigger, faster than its peers.

In defense of ExxonMobil stock
Now don't get me wrong. ExxonMobil isn't all bad. To the contrary, as the following chart shows, when it comes to producing cash from its business, Exxon is actually one of the better performers in the oil industry:

XOM Free Cash Flow Yield Chart

XOM Free Cash Flow Yield data by YCharts

That said, Exxon's only "better" in comparison to the competition -- and "better" isn't quite the same as "good."

Foolish takeaway
Right now, ExxonMobil stock boasts a free cash flow yield (that's the amount of cash profit it produces, divided by the company's market cap) of just 4%. That's a better number than the 1.3% FCF yield at Chevron, and much better than what cash-burning BP reports. But few investors, I suspect, get into this business in hopes of buying a company that can take a dollar of investment and turn it into just four pennies' worth of profits.

If you ask me, the fact that Exxon generates only a 4% free cash flow yield does little to argue in favor of ExxonMobil stock as a good investment. What it really tells you is that if Exxon is the best the oil industry can offer, maybe it's better to stay away from oil companies altogether. Because just like ExxonMobil stock itself, the rest of these companies are also going nowhere.

If you're on the lookout for some better energy plays, check out The Motley Fool's "3 Stocks for $100 Oil." For free access to this special report, simply click here now.


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 30, 2013, at 12:25 AM, quasimodo007 wrote:

    Bet the CEO bonuses and pay is still going UP

  • Report this Comment On June 30, 2013, at 7:18 AM, drandyd wrote:

    Perhaps the stock would o sooo much better if Obama taxed the energy sector more and added

    pages of regulations on them.

    Liberal government interference seems to always spur growth in the private sector.

  • Report this Comment On June 30, 2013, at 7:25 AM, drandyd wrote:

    @ Quasimodo : Please take note of the film " stars " now getting $20 mil a picture . Bill Clinton , who did not own a home prior to his election is now worth $90 mil. Pro athletes drawing millions running around shooting folks drawing mils. Hip - Hop moguls approaching a net worth of $1 bil .

    Recording 'artists' earning up. You can lump all those together and they have not , nor will not create the jobs the energy sector does , nor ever be responsible for paying the amount of taxes The responsibility for the safety these folks bear of environment is tremendous.These CEO's earn their loot.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2516801, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/19/2014 11:35:36 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement