A Closer Look at Exxon's LNG Export Venture

Last month, ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM  ) signed an agreement with Qatar Petroleum that will make it possible for the two companies to export natural gas from their proposed Golden Pass facility in Texas.  

If approved, the project could be especially beneficial for the U.K., which has become a major importer of natural gas over the past decade, as its domestic production has fallen sharply in recent years, even plunging to its lowest level since 1985 last year.  

Exxon and Qatar's national oil company have agreed to open up capacity at the South Hook receiving terminal in Milford Haven, in south Wales, to take shipments from Golden Pass. Negotiations on the commercial details of the agreement are expected to commence shortly.

The joint venture partners expect sales from Golden Pass to reach as much as 15.6 million metric tons of LNG a year, facilitated by their existing networks and other arrangements. If all that production were to be exported to South Hook, it would be enough to meet a quarter of the U.K.'s demand for natural gas.

DOE approval required
However, natural gas sales from Golden Pass to the U.K. will require U.S. government approval, since the U.K. doesn't have a free-trade agreement with the United States. Golden Pass is one of more than two dozen U.S. LNG export facilities that have applied for an export permit from the Department of Energy.

So far, only two projects have received the DOE's stamp of approval: Cheniere Energy's (NYSEMKT: LNG  ) Sabine Pass terminal in Louisiana, which was greenlighted in 2011, and the Freeport LNG project in Texas -- a $10 billion facility in Texas that's 50% owned by ConocoPhillips  (NYSE: COP  ) -- which received permission this month.

Though Freeport's approval is a promising sign, the DOE has said it will work through application requests in the order they were received. That means Golden Pass is unlikely to receive a go-ahead any time soon. The company developing the project, a joint venture owned 70% by Qatar Petroleum and 30% by Exxon, applied for a permit in October, which puts it at 13th place on the list of applications.

Obama administration signals support for exports
With the Obama administration having signaled that it supports natural gas exports, additional projects are likely to be approved in the months and years ahead. Not only are gas exports seen as vital to increasing U.S. energy security and geopolitical leverage, but they would also offer U.S. gas producers the option to ship their product to more lucrative foreign markets.

Asia stands out as one of the most profitable opportunities. In Japan, for instance, natural gas costs about four times as much as it does in the United States. In the wake of the Fukushima disaster, which has virtually shut off the nation's supply of nuclear energy, Japan has become an even bigger importer of energy, making it a prime target for U.S. LNG.

If the DOE approves additional projects, Chesapeake Energy, as the nation's second-largest gas producer, stands to benefit greatly. Though the company has allocated the majority of its capital this year toward drilling in liquids-rich plays, natural gas still makes up more than three-quarters of the company's production mix. Will the company be able to ramp up oil production and survive until natural gas prices finally recover? Or will it languish under the weight of its heavy debt load? To answer that question and to learn more about Chesapeake and its enormous potential, you're invited to check out The Motley Fool's brand-new premium report on the company. Simply click here now to access your copy, and, as a bonus, you'll receive a full year of key updates and expert guidance as news continues to develop.


Read/Post Comments (0) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

DocumentId: 2517004, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/19/2014 5:40:59 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement