Citigroup Shareholders Shake Off Billion-Dollar Settlement

The nation's third largest bank by assets, Citigroup (NYSE: C  ) , has agreed to pay Fannie Mae $968 million to settle claims that it sold faulty mortgages to the now-government controlled entity. But don't tell that to Citi's shareholders. Shares of the bank closed higher yesterday on the heels of the news, and they are on their way to doing so again today, up by 0.66% at the time of writing.

My colleague John Grgurich explained the apparent paradox yesterday. In his opinion, it boiled down to three factors.

First, and in my opinion foremost, the settlement clears up substantial uncertainty surrounding Citi's shares. As CitiMortgage CEO Jane Fraser noted, "This agreement resolves substantially all potential future repurchase claims from them for loan originations from 2000 to 2012." These claims had weighed on its valuation, as it had at other banks like Bank of America (NYSE: BAC  ) , which reached its own settlement with Fannie Mae earlier this year.

Second, the settlement, while far from inconsequential, could have been far worse. Thanks to its near-fatal decision to acquire Countrywide, Bank of America's settlement amounted to more than $10 billion, mixed between cash payments and repurchase agreements. Given this, $1 billion doesn't seem so bad.

Finally, according to Citi, the bank's earnings won't take a hit from the settlement. This is because its previously set-aside reserves are more than sufficient to absorb the blow. That doesn't mean it's done setting aside reserves, but just that it won't have to accelerate the amount.

All of this being said, there's one thing to point out, here. That is, Citi must still settle analogous claims with Freddie Mac. Bank of America's case got off easy in this regard. In 2011, the nation's second largest bank by assets entered into similar settlements with both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In the latter's case, however, its deal resolved not only any pending claims, but also all future claims. If nothing else, this shows the value of good attorneys.

Settlement or not, however, in both Citigroup and Bank of America's cases, there's reason to believe big banks will no longer be as profitable as they used to be. This is why some of the market's smartest investors have begun to cast their eyes on smaller and more ably run banks like the one identified in our free report, "The Stock Warren Buffett Wishes He Could Buy." To learn the identity of this high-flying bank before the rest of the market catches on, simply click here now.

link


Read/Post Comments (0) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2521022, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/31/2014 11:19:12 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement