Gambling on the Future Price of Oil

There are very few terms in the investment world that can illicit as much fear as the statement "Oil prices are going...", regardless of what is inserted after the verb. When we hear that oil prices are going up because the cost to extract it is becoming more expensive, we can begrudgingly accept that fact because we understand it. What we fear most about oil prices is when we don't completely understand the reason prices are changing. This is the realm of derivatives, futures contracts, and speculation. Let's take a look at the basics of the financial aspect of oil and see what makes us so scared of it. 

An investment idea with the best of intentions...
Like all basic commodities, oil can be bought and sold on a futures contract. These contracts mean that you are willing to buy a set amount of oil today based on current prices and receive delivery at some time in the future. It's the same idea as buying home heating oil in the summer to be delivered in the winter. The hope is that when you buy, also known as taking the "long position", the price of oil is less than what it will be when you actually need it. On the flip side, you are taking a risk that oil prices will drop between the times of purchase and delivery.

This basic principle is found across hundreds of industries. Last year when natural gas prices were at historical lows, Dow Chemical (NYSE: DOW  ) looked to buy futures contracts in natural gas to lock in those cheap prices for months because it was betting that natural gas prices were about to rise. For a company that can boost earnings by $200 million for every 10-cent drop in ethane prices, a cheap feedstock can go a long way.

Conversely, producers of oil and natural gas will want to write a sell contract, or take the "short position" whenever they believe that the prices of oil and gas are about to drop. Probably one of the most visible companies participating in these kinds of contracts is LINN Energy (NASDAQ: LINE  )  As a master limited partnership looking to provide consistent payouts to its shareholders, it writes several hundred million dollars in futures contracts to shield against any major price fluxes that would damage the company's ability to pay out distributions.

...plagued by an investor's greatest enemy
These contracts are a way to make the unpredictable world of commodity prices become slightly more predictable, if left to the producers and consumers of oil. The catch is that there are several more players out there who simply buy and sell these futures contracts who neither produce oil nor consume it. Banks, money managers, even individuals can buy or sell these contracts on the mercantile exchanges, and more and more people are doing so. The following chart shows how open contracts -- oil that has been bought but not yet delivered -- have grown significantly over the past several years.

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration

Investors who do not have a direct working interest in oil and gas mostly use these futures contracts as a way to bet, or "hedge", against inflation. Thanks to some recent fears that the Federal Reserve will slow its bond buying program, these inflation-hedging financial instruments are picking up. Both the United States Oil Fund (NYSEMKT: USO  ) and the Ultra DJ-AIG Crude Oil (NYSEMKT: UCO  ) are some of the top traded ETF's on the market today, both averaging well over 2 million in trade volume per day. 

The difference in how these two different groups buy and sell in the market is astounding. While most contracts from parties that either produce or consume oil look to lock in prices to prevent a slide...

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration

...non-commercial parties have been betting heavily that the price of oil and gas will go up:

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration

While investing in oil futures can be lucrative, it also can be driven by one of the nemeses of long-term investors: fear. The best example of this was the oil price shock between 2007 and 2008. At the time, there were some serious concerns over whether oil supply could keep up with demand. What made this even worse, though, is that news articles (like this Bloomberg one) drove people into futures contracts hoping to use oil as an asset that was poised to spike in the following months. But as the great economist Benjamin Graham noted years ago: "In the short run, the market is a voting machine, but in the long run it is a weighing machine."

In the case of 2008 and oil speculators, the same was true. A heightened fear of demand outpacing our ability to produce led to an overreaction in the market, which in turn led to a quick collapse. It's not to say that those who poured money into oil futures were completely wrong, but the fear associated with higher prices led many into grossly overestimating the degree to which oil prices would change. 

What a Fool believes
It's not wrong or immoral or corrupt in any way to invest in futures contracts in any commodity. Long-term investments in commodities can be lucrative investments. To be a successful investor in commodities, though, you need to display the same temperament that has made great investors like Warren Buffett and Peter Lynch the legends they are today. Avoid fearful overreactions to fluctuations, and resist tempting opportunities where you have not yet done your due diligence. A disciplined approach in any investment vehicle can pay off.

Let us help you get started on the track of disciplined investing. Analysts at The Motley Fool have identified a behind-the-scenes energy giant that is positioned to make big profits for years to come and could be a smart addition to almost any portfolio. Invest with confidence instead of fear by checking out the special free report: "The Only Energy Stock You'll Ever Need." Simply click here to access your own copy of this free report.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (6)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 10, 2013, at 3:52 PM, EllenBrandtPhD wrote:

    Gee, remember MF Global?

    Some of us believe a similar situation could be building in the ridiculously overdone and over-leveraged Kill Loonie! bet some deep-pocketed entities in Canada have made.

    This bet never made sense standing on its own two feet. It is simply an algorithmic adjunct to humongous Yen Short of the Ages bets, in turn tied to Kill Gold! bets and Shorts in the US versions of dual-listed Canadian-US stocks, which are mostly Gold and Oil stocks.

    But with WTI soaring for structural, geopolitical, and soon weather reasons, all the algorithms are going amok fast.

    The Cronies are furiously trying to de-couple both their Kill Gold! and their Kill Loonie! bets from their Yen Short of the Ages bets, but they may not make it in time, if something even worse happens to boost WTI further.

    Yes, the most deep-pocketed of the Bay Street Cronies will be OK, as they always are. But there could well be some lesser Cronies which are badly hurt, a la the previous "macro bets" of MF Global and any number of others.

    The Canadian economy is doing as well or better than the US economy, not worse. Its jobless rate is still considerably lower, and its manufacturing sector is recovering faster. To top it off, the Bank of Canada reiterates about every five minutes that it will probably start raising rates six months before the US does.

    IMO, both the Canadian government and the Canadian people are angry at the Cronies for their Kill Loonie! campaign. Canadians expect the Loonie to be at or very near parity. They want it back - fast.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2528772, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/27/2014 8:53:10 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement