I’m Adding More Money to This Incredible Value

Earlier this week, Bridgepoint Education (NYSE: BPI  ) revealed that the Western Association of Schools and Colleges had approved the company's Ashford University application for accreditation for five years. Investors had been concerned about this accreditation issue for the last year or so, and shares jumped on the news. They're now up about 50% from where my Special Situations portfolio bought in late April.

But guess what? Despite the price rise, the stock has been significantly de-risked, it's cheap, and it's time to buy more before a future run-up. So my Special Situations portfolio is adding another $1,000 to the allocation of this for-profit educator.

All the news
The accreditation news was the biggest overhang on the shares, and it was with a sigh of relief that I heard the word. But with the worst-case scenario off the table, the stock is arguably cheaper than it was before. That's because now the company has a range of value-creating actions.

First, Bridgepoint also announced that it has targeted $85 million in cost cuts. The company suggests that these cuts "will not sacrifice the commitments and investments we made to improve student learning, success and outcomes." At Bridgepoint's trailing effective tax rate of 38.2%, that translates into $52.5 million in after-tax profit, or nearly $1 per share. That's a significant cost-cutting program. Those effects won't come into full effect until mid-2014, but until then, the income statement will be bolstered by ongoing cost reductions.

Of course, that cost savings is in addition to whatever the company would earn otherwise. Maybe that's $1 per share, maybe $1.50. The company is declining to give guidance on its upcoming conference call in early August, but noted that enrollments should hit an inflection point in the fourth quarter and head upward.

Second, the company has nearly $429 million in cash and short-term investments, as well as more than $96 million in long-term investments. Plus, it has no debt. That's not a capital structure that maximizes shareholder value.

With few other likely uses for that cash, it should be returned to shareholders in some form or other. That could include buybacks, or a special dividend, and ideally would include some type of leveraged recap, as well. Issuing debt, and then getting that money to shareholders through buybacks or a special dividend, would show that management is serious about creating value.

Encouragingly, there is a precedent for buybacks, with the company having spent a total of $135 million in 2010 and 2011 on shares. I'd love to see more of this, and at a more aggressive level. In any case, this type of cash should not be sitting on the balance sheet.

In short, this stock should be worth a lot more.

Foolish bottom line
Despite the run-up in shares, Bridgepoint still looks like a great special situation. So I'll be adding $1,000 of the stock to my Special Situations portfolio.

Interested in Bridgepoint Education or have another stock to share? Join me on my discussion board and follow me on Twitter (@TMFRoyal).


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (8)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 16, 2013, at 12:22 PM, pondee619 wrote:

    "Bridgepoint also announced that it has targeted $85 million in cost cuts. The company suggests that these cuts "will not sacrifice the commitments and investments we made to improve student learning, success and outcomes."

    What are they spending that money on now?

    Why are they spending that money now?

    If, as they claim, $85 Million in costs can be cut with no "sacrifice (to)the commitments and investments we made to improve student learning, success and outcomes", WHY were these costs incurred in the first place?

  • Report this Comment On July 16, 2013, at 12:39 PM, shamapant wrote:

    Most of it is labor. The For-Profits were engaged for huge future volume growth, but suddenly it's looking like volume growth will be relatively stagnant so they can let go of a lot of labor they had hired as essentially infrastructure. If this was a capital intensive business it would be like they're selling "non-core assets"...these are just "non-core expenses".

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2535252, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/27/2014 5:00:24 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement