Eat Twinkies, Lose Weight?

The much-heralded return of the iconic Twinkie to store shelves this past week was met with a bit of a surprise: The golden cake had slimmed down.

According to the Associated Press, rather than the 42.5-gram/150-calorie tube of sugary goodness you remember, the new Twinkie being sold is a trim 38.5 grams and 135 calories. Now you don't have to feel so guilty about eating a pack or two in one sitting. You can tell everyone it's "diet food"!

In reality, the change occurred before cake maker Hostess went bankrupt. Apparently in the months leading up to seeking court protection because of its high legacy costs, the Twinkies maker sought to save money by stretching the ingredients thin. Now that they're in the hands of private equity firms Apollo Global Management and Metropoulos, keeping the trimmed-down cake size makes good financial sense.

It's not the first time manufacturers have thought to water down their product for added profit. Spirits maker Beam (NYSE: BEAM  ) literally tried to water down its Maker's Mark bourbon in a bid to stretch supply to meet demand. The outcry was such that it had Beam backpedaling quickly and offering up a social-media mea culpa.

Nearly a decade ago, Brown-Forman (NYSE: BF-B  )  also lowered the proof on its Jack Daniel's whiskey, while Kellogg and other cereal makers have reduced the size of their boxes though they charge the same money as for the bigger box. And a few years ago, Hershey (NYSE: HSY  ) shrank some of its chocolate bars from 8 ounces to 6.8 ounces and kept the price the same -- until a few months later, that is, when the company raised the cost of the smaller bar because of "rising commodity costs."

Sure, sugar costs more these days, too -- it's a profitable addiction for sugar companies -- but consumers aren't about to complain about the smaller Twinkie size, so happy are they that the goodies are back on the shelves at all. Although unreasonable union demands forced Hostess into bankruptcy, the value of its brands even beyond the Twinkie -- there are also Ding Dongs, Ho Hos, Sno Balls, and Dolly Madison Zingers -- hardly left a doubt they'd be back on the shelves sooner or later.

Who knows --maybe we'll see Twinkie "bites" coming out in those 100-calorie snack packs that are supposed to be healthier for you. So long as you don't eat them all in one sitting, perhaps your favorite cake-and-cream snack can make for a thinner you, too.

As King Edward's mistress Wallis Simpson once noted, you can never be too thin or too rich. When it comes to investing, the best investment strategy is to pick great companies and stick with them for the long term. The Motley Fool's free report "3 Stocks That Will Help You Retire Rich" not only shares stocks that could help you build long-term wealth, but also winning strategies that every investor should know. Click here to grab your free copy today.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (3)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 07, 2014, at 3:16 PM, jessievera wrote:

    I would stay away from processed and artificial foods if you are wanting to lose weight or get healthy. These snacks are very addictive with so much sugar that people can't stop eating them. I agree that they are an iconic name to America and have been around for so long that people are attached to these sugary brands.

    Jessie | http://www.drswtloss.com/about-us/

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2547504, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/22/2014 9:46:17 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement