Las Vegas Sands Is Still Gaming King

The headline numbers for the second quarter look pretty outstanding for Las Vegas Sands (NYSE: LVS  ) . Net revenue increased 25.6%, to $3.24 billion, hold-adjusted property EBITDA was up 29%, to $1.17 billion, and net income was up 42.1%, to $597.6 million. But a deeper dive into the numbers show at least a little disappointment in the quarter. 

The good and bad in Macau
Macau was a different story depending on where you looked. Sands Cotai Central is finally starting to generate the gaming volume Sheldon Adelson envisioned, but ran into bad luck; The Venetian Macau saw mass market play jump, and had good luck with high rollers, and Sands Macau continues to slowly fall victim to Cotai.

The best way to analyze the numbers is to look at rolling chip volume (high roller play), non-rolling chip volume (mass market table games), and slot handle at the company's casinos. For some perspective on the growth each component displayed, remember that Sands Cotai Central wasn't fully open, so a better gauge than growth there is comparing figures to The Venetian Macau, and Macau's overall revenue was up 15.8% in the quarter.

 

Rolling Chip Volume

Non-Rolling Chip Volume

Slot Handle

Venetian Macau

$11.84 billion

+6.1%

$1.59 billion

+56.1%

$1.15 billion

+0.1%

Sands Cotai Central

$14.34 billion

+110.2%

$1.23 billion

215.4%

$1.25 billion

+87.8%

Four Seasons Macau

$9.94 billion

8%

$186.1 million

+104.5%

$182.0 million

-8.6%

Sands Macau

$5.82 billion

-5.6%

$822.9 million

+14.8%

$637.2 million

+4.2%

Total

$41.94 billion

+25.7%

$3.83 billion

+72.7%

$3.22 billion

+22.6%

Source: Las Vegas Sands Q2 2013 earnings release.

We can see that the center column is the strongest, which means that mass-market play is growing, especially on Cotai. What's a little less clear is how much growth we can expect in the high roller business on Cotai. The Venetian Macau and Four Seasons both experienced relatively slow growth rates in high-end play and negative growth in slots.

With that said, overall volume growth was strong for Las Vegas Sands, and the company clearly took share from Wynn Resorts, Melco Crown, and MGM Resorts  over the past year.

When looking at other operators that will report earnings over the next few weeks, we can see trends toward Cotai continue. That will hurt Wynn and MGM until their Cotai resorts are complete, and likely help Melco Crown's results again this quarter. 

Singapore disappoints
The real disappointment right now is Singapore, where Marina Bay Sands isn't generating the profit Sheldon Adelson expected when he built the resort. There was hope the resort would generate $2 billion in EBITDA and, after generating $1.72 billion in EBITDA from Q2 2011 to Q1 2012, that looked possible. But revenue growth has slowed, and the resort has only generated $1.32 billion in EBITDA over the past year. 

That's still a big figure, but when your company is valued at 12 times EBITDA, a $700-million shortfall from expectations priced into the stock can be a drag.

A new cash king
What's new for gaming companies lately is returning money to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases. Extra cash was used for growth until recent years, but with the sheer cash Macau casinos are spitting off, Las Vegas Sands and Wynn are able to pay back shareholders.

In Las Vegas Sands' case, that means a $0.35 per-share quarterly dividend and a new $2.0 billion share buyback program. The company is also steadily lowering its debt, which now stands at $9.49 billion. This greatly reduces the company's risk and provides some stability for shareholders in the future.

To buy or not to buy?
Despite the drop in shares today, I think this was a pretty good quarter for Las Vegas Sands. The company is growing steadily in Macau, and disappointing results in Singapore and Las Vegas were both affected by lower-than-expected winning percentages. That will adjust over time, and even though Singapore may not be as big as Adelson once expected, it's still an amazingly profitable casino.

My only reservation with the stock is its price. Las Vegas Sands's enterprise value is 12.3 times EBITDA, which is well higher than a 9.5 ratio for Wynn, and 9.8 for MGM Resorts. Melco Crown is higher at 13.8 times EBITDA, but it's a smaller company, and will double the number of casinos it owns in the next three years, so it's harder to compare against. 

Las Vegas Sands does have The Parisian under construction and should be completed near the end of 2015. It's also working on Eurovegas in Spain, which could initially be a $7.9 billion investment. These will drive growth but, in my opinion, they won't create enough growth to command a 20% premium over competitors, which also have new resorts in the works. If the stock falls 10% or so, I think it would be a great buy; but at the moment, it's fairly priced with growth baked in. 

Las Vegas Sands has been a growth company for years, and Motley Fool co-founder David Gardner, founder of the No. 1 growth stock newsletter in the world, has developed a unique strategy for uncovering even more truly wealth-changing stock picks. And he wants to share it, along with a few of his favorite growth stock superstars, WITH YOU! It's a special 100% FREE report called "6 Picks for Ultimate Growth." So stop settling for index-hugging gains... and click HERE for instant access to a whole new game plan of stock picks to help power your portfolio.


Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (0)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 25, 2013, at 6:34 PM, spokanimal wrote:

    Singapore's hold continues it's unlucky streak... this is the 5th quarter in a row now, I believe.

    But it's a tale of 2 stories there. Gaming volumes surged 64% year-over-year in Q4. Many analysts... and writers like you, Travis... reminded us of Marina Bay's thin, but high-betting VIPs and how they can create huge surges and wanes in betting volumes from quarter to quarter.

    But then, volumes surged another 42% YOY in Q1 and 25% in Q2. Wow... "sustained" elevated volumes... and Singapore's economy hasn't exactly been booming to account for such elevated VIP play either.

    So, is LVS's Singapore resort "disappointing", as you state? Sure, when you ignore betting volumes and hold percentages and focus only on gross gaming revenues, it looks disappointing...

    ... but real securities analysts don't do that.

    Spokanimal

  • Report this Comment On July 25, 2013, at 7:40 PM, blackjackkid wrote:

    Without an internet strategy (because of Sheldon Adelson moral belief's re internet gambling) LVS will be left by the wayside by other competitors who are aggressively developing internet games for real money play beginning this year in NV and NJ and more states in the coming years.

  • Report this Comment On July 26, 2013, at 10:29 AM, mbablitz wrote:

    Travis, just using your metrics, when you compare EBITDA numbers for WYNN, MGM, Melco and LVS, I would say they are exactly as they should be. Why? LVS & Melco fortunes are rising faster than the others. The Parisian will open close to its scheduled time. WYNN and MGM will be lucky to have their new properties in Macau up and running by the end of 2016. WYNN has already announced delays... welcome to Macau's labor shortage problems.

    The projects for WYNN and MGM also mean those companies will be putting a lot of their cash into buildings while LVS can put its extra cash into the pockets of shareholders via dividends and stock buybacks. I would also bet LVS will raise its dividend perhaps as soon as next quarter...

  • Report this Comment On July 26, 2013, at 10:00 PM, BenKeel wrote:

    LVS is waaaay undervalued when you consider enterprise value vs. competitors.

    $65 by July 31st.

    Gauranteed.!!!!!!!!

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 2559988, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/23/2014 9:17:36 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement