Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



The Forgotten $150 Billion Banking Bailout

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

On this day in economic and business history...

The savings and loan crisis of the 1980s had many causes, and like most financial meltdowns, it also had many attempted solutions. One of the earliest attempted solutions for this bubbling catastrophe was the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA), signed into law by President George H. W. Bush on Aug. 9, 1989. The act established the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC), and also put in place several changes to the financial-industry regulatory regime of the United States that would play a part in the subprime mortgage crisis two decades later.

The RTC wound up serving as janitor to the garbage-filled savings-and-loan industry. From its establishment to the final gasps of the crisis in 1995, the RTC wound up 747 thrift banks with assets totaling $394 billion. This was the lion's share of the total cost and impact of the crisis, which began in 1986 and which saw a total of 1,043 thrifts with $519 billion in assets fail by 1995. The RTC was initially funded with $50 billion, but this proved inadequate to handle the huge wave of thrift failures it was forced to deal with in 1989 and 1990. By 1995, the RTC's funding had been more than doubled to $105 billion, but this was only a part of the estimated $153 billion total cost of the crisis to American interests, both public and private. Taxpayers wound up footing $124 billion in bailout cleanup costs that were never recouped.

The remainder of FIRREA focused on tightening up the regulatory structure surrounding the affected sectors. Thrifts had been allowed to play somewhat fast and loose with their accounting thanks to a series of ill-devised regulatory gimmicks, ultimately pushed aside by FIRREA's adoption of stricter compliance requirements. The savings-and-loan industry was also taken under the protection of the FDIC, safeguarding depositor funds while imposing another set of regulatory requirements.

FIRREA also established the Federal Housing Finance Board (FHFB) to regulate the lending infrastructure behind Fannie Mae (NASDAQOTH: FNMA  ) and Freddie Mac (NASDAQOTH: FMCC  ) . This may have been its greatest legislative failing -- the FHFB was eliminated as a government agency and replaced by the Federal Housing Finance Agency when it became apparent that it had not adequately regulated the spread of subprime mortgages.

Other reforms implemented by this legislation also aimed to regulate the real estate industry, and since part of these reforms included real estate appraisals (which soared beyond all common sense in the prelude to the subprime meltdown), we can only conclude that FIRREA was an abject failure in its efforts to keep that sector of the economy on sound footing over the long term. However, it did keep the economy from falling apart due to savings-and-loan collapses in the 1990s -- the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES: ^DJI  ) , despite suffering a brief decline due to the Iraq War, was 12% higher two years after FIRREA became law, and a decade later it had grown an incredible 300% as the longest bull market in history reached its peak.

Despite its housing-related deficiencies, FIRREA has again become useful in the aftermath of the subprime meltdown. The Justice Department has made repeated use of FIRREA's Section 951 to seek extra penalties against those who commit certain crimes "affecting a federally insured financial institution." Many of these post-crash legal efforts have involved bank-initiated mortgages backed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

The industrial side of internal combustion
Rudolf Diesel received a patent for the internal combustion engine that still bears his name on Aug. 9, 1898. This award legitimized Diesel's work to improve the fuel efficiencies of early internal combustion technology, which by this point was dominated by gasoline-driven engines pioneered by Karl Benz and other 19th-century automotive inventors. EDN's historical-moments blog notes the advances Diesel's engine made over its competition:

Diesel focused on his knowledge that as much as 90% of the energy available in fuel is wasted in a steam engine. After experimenting with a Carnot Cycle engine, Diesel worked on his design for a compression-ignition engine where fuel was injected at the end of compression and the fuel was ignited by the high temperature resulting from compression. ...

The diesel engine required a heavier, more robust construction than a gasoline engine at the time. Diesel engines ran more fuel efficiently than gasoline engines because of much higher compression ratios and longer duration of combustion.

Diesel soon established the Consolidated Diesel Manufacturing Company to capitalize on his invention, but he did not live to see diesel engines enter widespread industrial and commercial use. It was not until the formation of Cummins (NYSE: CMI  ) in 1919 -- six years after Diesel's death -- and the establishment of Caterpillar (NYSE: CAT  ) in 1925 (and its switch to diesel engines in 1931) that diesel manufacturers began to gain a lasting foothold. The annual worldwide market for diesel engines is now fast approaching $200 billion, but these efficient engines are no longer confined to industrial use. Nearly 10 million "clean diesel" vehicles were sold worldwide in 2012.

One home run investing opportunity has been slipping under Wall Street's radar for months. But it won't stay hidden much longer. Forward-thinking energy players like GE and Ford have already plowed sizable amounts of research capital into this little-known stock... because they know it holds the key to the explosive profit power of the coming "no-choice fuel revolution." Luckily, there's still time for you to get on board if you act quickly. All the details are inside an exclusive report from The Motley Fool. Click here for the full story!

Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 09, 2013, at 12:13 PM, doanngo wrote:

    Stop re-inventing the wheel. What works leave it alone. Just enforce rules, regulation, and loop-holes scammed by the banks and the big guys would save lot of money and prevent market from being turbulenced . Politicians must step aside and should not protect banking bad behaviors. That is the American way. Don't waste our tax money to create redundant system to take care of our complex housing system which will takes years to work effectively. Politicians do not know anything about housing. Just look at the interviews with Corker. When asked about punishment for bad behavior banker, he dogded the question that because they backed by bankers. When he being asked for why replacing Fannie Mae and Mac by the same replica, he just turn his back to the question. That just proved it . Wake up and smell the coffee. Corker-Warner bill Politicians give music to our ears. They just want to say what taxpayers want to hear but they do not have any clue of how to run the system and yet they spoke like eating piece of cake. Like Michael Kao said, stop re-invent and just enforce rules and regulation would save lot of money. Use that saved money (billions) to help the unfortunates, and support the young generations instead. Kao had done it before with Ford

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2588063, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/26/2016 6:27:00 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 2 days ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,261.45 -131.01 -0.71%
S&P 500 2,164.69 -12.49 -0.57%
NASD 5,305.75 -33.78 -0.63%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

9/23/2016 4:55 PM
^DJI $18261.45 Down -131.01 -0.71%
CAT $82.44 Down -1.06 -1.27%
Caterpillar CAPS Rating: ***
CMI $120.63 Down -1.29 -1.06%
Cummins CAPS Rating: *****
FMCC $1.64 Up +0.01 +0.61%
Freddie Mac CAPS Rating: ***
FNMA $1.76 Up +0.02 +1.15%
Fannie Mae CAPS Rating: ***