Why I'm Preparing for Volatility in the Mortgage Sector

For bank investors, the changes in today's interest rate environment simply cannot be ignored. I expect interest rates to become increasingly volatile over the next 6 to 12 months, and this volatility will present buying opportunities in high-quality mortgage companies caught up in short-term market movements.

The tides of interest rate change began in May as rates began to move skyward, and the climb continued through the summer. The Federal Reserve is currently the main driver of interest rates, and the markets are on edge waiting for the outcome of next month's meeting of the Fed's Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) to decide the short-term future of U.S. monetary policy.

Why I do expect volatility in interest rates
First, many of today's monetary policies have never been tried before, at least not on the scale we have today. As such, the markets have no precedent to study and no prior experience to guide expectations. What will happen next is anyone's best guess.

Beyond that, many economic indicators provide conflicting or unclear direction for the economy. GDP is growing, though at just less than 2% in the second quarter, it remains sluggish. Unemployment is steadily improving, but problems remain in the youth demographic and for long-term unemployed individuals.

The real estate market is showing signs of improvement, with home sales and values rising impressively over the past two years. But at the same time, Wells Fargo Economics reports that as of the first quarter, 19.8% of all mortgage loans in the U.S. are underwater with loan balances higher than the value of the house.

Today's reality is that the Fed is in uncharted territory, deciding when and how to unwind novel policies on an uncertain and confusing economic landscape. When the markets are left guessing, volatility ensues. 

Third, members of the FOMC have been, well, confusing in their recent public statements.

Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve, has been back-peddling all summer after appearing too aggressive in tapering the Fed's policies in remarks following the May meeting. He's been joined by other like-minded FOMC members, notably Janet Yellen (more on Ms. Yellen in a moment). 

On the flip side, Richard Fisher, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas -- and currently not a voting member of the FOMC -- was quoted just last week in the German newspaper Handelsblatt as saying that the Fed "should begin reducing bond purchases in September, as long as we don't see a clear worsening of the economic data." Charles Evans, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, made similar statements the week before, albeit with a bit more nuance than Fisher.

Adding to the uncertainty, Mr. Bernanke's tenure as chairman of the Federal Reserve will be ending in early 2014. Most of the "in the know" commentators anticipate either Larry Summers or Janet Yellen to be the next chairperson, though no one outside President Obama's inner circle knows which of the two has the inside track.

With so much uncertainty, it's worth repeating: When the markets are left guessing, volatility ensues.

For the mortgage industry, the stakes are high
Low interest rates had been fueling a boom in mortgage refinancing -- a boom that contributed billions in origination fees to the likes of Wells Fargo  (NYSE: WFC  ) . But that boom has cooled seemingly overnight at just a hint of rising rates.

With 26% of second-quarter non-interest revenue coming from its mortgage business, a slowdown of this scale could seriously dampen earnings at Wells while the rate environment attempts to find some stability.

This would only be a short-term issue, though, as higher rates will benefit the bank in the long term by providing higher yields. Remember, bank income is based on the interest rates for loans. Higher interest rates mean higher income in times of stable rates.

Beyond banks, the mortgage REIT sector has been hit particularly hard this summer thanks to the rate environment. Companies like Annaly Capital Management  (NYSE: NLY  ) and Invesco Mortgage Capital  (NYSE: IVR  )  have been sent to lows nearing 40% from each company's 52-week high, driven by tightening interest rate spreads and declining book values. 

Annaly has been hard at work over the summer, increasing its interest rate hedges to now cover 92% of its investments, selling $32 billion in assets to reduce risk on the balance sheet, and otherwise restructuring the portfolio to better perform in a volatile interest rate environment. 

Invesco, like Annaly, has the advantage of being a hybrid REIT, meaning it can invest in securities not issued by either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. On the companies' second-quarter earnings call, CEO Richard King highlighted increased interest rate hedging, diversifying into commercial securities with attractive yields, and improving the companies funding strategies in anticipation of further volatility. 

A common theme
The vast majority of investors and market observers recognize that interest rates will rise from today's historically low levels. The uncertainty is when and how rates will move from low to high. 

Unfortunately for my bank account, I don't have a crystal ball to see the future in the markets. But I do recognize the uncertainty today, and to me, that indicates volatility. When faced with these challenging conditions, I want my investing dollars in companies that are fundamentally sound and capable of weathering the storm.

Bargains of a lifetime are still available in bank stocks, but it's critical to understand what makes the best banks tick. The Motley Fool's new report "Finding the Next Bank Stock Home Run" demystifies the perils of investing in banks and reveals how savvy investors can win. It's completely free -- click here to get started.


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (3)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 19, 2013, at 11:36 PM, Dadw5boys wrote:

    There are Billions at stake and without tight controls here we go again down the tubes. They should keep Fannie, thighten the rules and let the U.S. Treasury enjoy the Billions.

    And never again force Faniie to take any loans written by other lenders like ther FDIC did with the over 900 failed Banks they closed !

  • Report this Comment On August 20, 2013, at 12:01 PM, Johny205 wrote:

    The FDIC didn't force Fanny and Freddie to take loans. When the FDIC places a bank into receivership, the banks assets are sold to another bank, the one with the highest bid. Any loss that occurs it paid through the FDIC fund --which is paid 100% by banks, not taxpayers. The banks that acquired other banks would have to hold their mortgages "in house" if they did not qualify for the secondary market.

  • Report this Comment On August 20, 2013, at 4:18 PM, todetli wrote:

    Talk about Master of the Obvious - come on Jay. You have to do better than this. Give some indication of when and by how much. Stick your neck out man!

    And for Dadw5boys, sir - please check your facts. Tighten the rules for lending...are you kidding me? Try being self-employed and qualifying for a mortgage. And yes, FDIC did not force Fannie or Freddie to purchase loans. Fannie and Freddie bundled the mixed bag of sub-prime, commercial and A-paper all by their greedy little government run selves...enter the meltdown.

    Bottom line - get privatization into securitization and let common sense begin to enter the market.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2601179, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/20/2014 5:34:54 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement