5 Reasons Cameco Will Rebound

In the last few weeks, nuclear experts have noted that the Fukushima leak is much worse than people were led to believe. This has caused concern among investors about uranium companies like Cameco (NYSE: CCJ  ) . Moreover, the price of uranium has continued to fall since the Fukushima disaster took place in 2011. In spite of the dismal outlook, Cameco was recently upgraded to a neutral rating from underperform by Zacks.

What is the current outlook at Fukushima?
Around 300 metric tons of radioactive water used to cool the reactors has leaked out, increasing the risk of contamination with each passing day. In order to stop this water from leaking, Japan's nuclear watchdog plans to build an underground wall made from frozen soil that runs across a length of 1.4 km. The construction cost is expected to be between $300 million and $410 million. Interestingly, Cameco has already used this technology at its Cigar Lake facility in Canada to protect the environment from possible contamination.

5 reasons Cameco will rebound in the coming years

1. Nuclear energy is clean
Nuclear energy may seem dangerous and controversial, but it is still the cleanest source of energy we know, as long as safety precautions are met. 11% of the globe's electricity is generated with the help of nuclear technology, with almost zero greenhouse gas emissions. 

There have only been three major nuclear accidents in history: Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and the Fukushima disaster. In order to ensure that the reactors are safe, western countries use an approach called 'defense-in-depth.' The approach involves using multiple safety systems including exceptional design and construction. 

2. Asian countries will drive the demand for nuclear fuel
Demand for clean alternative sources of energy in high-demand countries like China, India,and South Korea will increase in the coming years. These fuel-hungry nations' nuclear power generating capacity is increasing significantly. Environmental safety measures enforced in India, China and South Korea will push those countries toward opting nuclear fuel. By 2020, the nuclear share in these three countries will be considerable, according to the World Nuclear Association. 

3. Bad economy in emerging countries will increase consumption of nuclear fuel
Conventional fuel is expensive, and it is becoming increasingly difficult for countries like India to import fuel because of a weakening economy. India imports approximately 80% of its fuel needs, and having to pay all that in USD is hurting its declining economy further. The rupee has been in the news lately for tumbling against the dollar.

Consequently, the Indian government is exploring measures that will reduce its fuel consumption. In the long term, this can only mean that there will be an increased demand for nuclear fuel. 

4. Increased global electricity consumption 
The world's clean energy supply will greatly increase in the next 20 years. By 2035, electricity demand is expected to increase by 73%. Because of the limitations of coal, natural gas and oil, energy derived from nuclear fuel will be used not just in emerging Asia, but across the world, including OECD nations. This amounts to a number of countries that will want to do business with a nuclear heavyweight like Cameco. 

5. Uranium use is not limited to energy
Uranium is not used only to generate energy and electricity. Its use in the fields of military, medicine, and scientific research is undisputed. Considering volatile political conditions across the world, there is bound to be an increase in the number of nuclear warheads among countries that currently have the technology. Nuclear medicine, which often uses uranium in various forms, is expected to become more prevalent. Nuclear medicine uses radioactive substances like uranium to diagnose and treat diseases. 

Smaller uranium players
Cameco doesn't face huge competition with respect to uranium. I previously discussed how Cameco compares favorably with bigger mining and energy companies like Rio Tinto and BHP Billiton, which have diversified. BHP Billiton divested its uranium properties and Rio Tinto's Rossing Mine in Namibia is running under losses.

Denison Mines (NYSEMKT: DNN  ) has a successful uranium operation in Saskatchewan, Canada. The company bought several projects from Fission Energy. International Enexco and Denison Mines have begun to drill at the Bachman lake, which is only four kilometers away from Cameco's Millenium Deposit. The 1,900 meter diamond drill program may help Denison Mines to add more uranium projects to its small portfolio.

The company has a market cap of $530 million and an enterprise value of $522 million. With a profit margin of -212% and an operating margin of -233%, it is not one of the most profitable companies in the space. 

Exelon (NYSE: EXC  ) is another big name in nuclear. With 17 nuclear reactors under its belt, the company is a gigantic power generator. Through Exelon Nuclear Partners, Exelon has sustained a profitable uranium business that revolves around power generation. The company has operations in the U.S. and Canada.

With a market cap of $26 billion and an enterprise value of $46 billion, Exelon is a large company. However, with a PEG ratio of -2.50, the company may have its own share of troubles. 

Foolish bottom line
The leaks at Fukushima will not decrease the demand for nuclear fuel in the future. Thanks to an increasing demand for clean fuel in countries like China, India and South Korea, Cameco will find more buyers for its products, increasing its revenue in the long term and making it an attractive buy.  

One home run investing opportunity has been slipping under Wall Street's radar for months. But it won't stay hidden much longer. Forward-thinking energy players like GE and Ford have already plowed sizable amounts of research capital into this little-known stock... because they know it holds the key to the explosive profit power of the coming "no choice fuel revolution." Luckily, there's still time for you to get on board if you act quickly. All the details are inside an exclusive report from The Motley Fool. Click here for the full story!

 

Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 12, 2013, at 2:39 PM, Igingras wrote:

    Some of what you say makes sense.

    Point 5, however, is partially ridiculous or at best over reaching.

    With respect to other uses, you may have a point in that there are other uses derived from nuclear fuel bundles pulled out of nuclear power plants and recycled into other things. But it inevitably comes from experimental reactors.

    But what irks me is your mention of political volatility and the use of nuclear weapons. It is disturbing because you disregard the admission that the US military has made insisting that nuclear weapons are not as practical, useful, or surgically applicable as they require it to be in modern warfare. Nuclear weapons are continuously being phased out in the megatons to megawatts programs. Furthermore, the bulk of uranium is produced in countries that have signed the non-proliferation treaty and so their production is banned from direct or indirect military applications.

    And thank goodness too. Thank goodness that sense and reason has overcome those who own such ghastly weapons and that this type of strike is competently and exhaustively being replaced by more rational surgical attacks with much greater efficiency and much less innocents impacted, with no requirements in any sense of nuclear weapons.

    No other metal on planet earth has a comprehensive and explicit ban from it being used for military applications.

    Your correctness in your overall assessment masks how you mistakenly obtain said conclusion.

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 2608458, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/16/2014 3:39:55 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement