This Is Why Bank of America Lags Its Peers

If you own shares of Bank of America (NYSE: BAC  ) , then it's likely you've wondered why it always seems to be so far behind its nearest competitors -- JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM  ) and Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC  ) foremost among them.

The short answer is that Bank of America alone made the monumental mistake of acquiring Countrywide Financial, a veritable Trojan horse, on the eve of the financial crisis. That acquisition has cost the bank upwards of $50 billion in various legal fees and settlements and eviscerated its earnings over the last five years.

The longer, and more complete, answer involves digging into the respective banks' financial statements. But to save you the time of doing so, I've constructed an infographic that illustrates the most revealing metrics. You can scroll through it by clicking on the small circles above the pie chart.

The Massive Leak in Bank of Americas Ship | Infographics.

The purpose of these charts is to show what happened to the total revenue at each of the nation's five largest banks in 2012 -- the impact from taxes is excluded.

In Bank of America's case, for example, of its roughly $83 billion in total revenue, it spent $67.9 billion on operating expenses, reserved $8.2 billion for anticipated future loan losses, and wrote off $4.2 billion for "unusual items" such as legal fees and settlements. That left a total of $3.1 billion in earnings before income taxes for the year 2012.

You can see the breakdown for each of the different banks by scrolling through the charts.

The two things to focus on here are the red and green portions -- the colors are not coincidental. Because red represents operating expenses, the objective is to minimize it. And because green represents earnings before taxes, the objective is to maximize it.

With this in mind, it's probably now obvious why Bank of America is so far behind its peers when it comes to profitability.

The difference between it and Citigroup (NYSE: C  ) is relatively small, as both have overly bloated cost structures. In the 12 months ended December 31, for instance, Bank of America's efficiency ratio (the portion of revenue that's subsumed by operating expenses) swelled to 85.6%. Meanwhile, Citigroup's came in at 72%. Both figures were well above the average among large lenders last year of 63%.

As you proceed further through the progression of graphs, however, the difference becomes greater and greater until you get to U.S. Bancorp (NYSE: USB  ) , the nation's largest regional bank. As you can see, it spends only half of its post-provision revenue on expenses and reserves a staggering 40% of the remainder for earnings.

The bad news for shareholders of Bank of America is that it takes time to realign the cost structure of an institution of comparable size. But the good news is that the bank's executives are focused like a laser on this objective.

Whether or not they succeed to the same extent as, say, U.S. Bancorp has is doubtful. But any movement in the right direction would nevertheless be a welcome relief to stakeholders in the nation's second largest bank by assets.

The golden age of banking is dead. But if you want to learn how to take advantage of the impending bank renaissance, click below to discover the one company leading the way. You see, this fast-growing company is poised to disrupt big banking's centuries-old practices. And it stands to make early investors like YOU a fortune... if you act now. Our brand new investor alert, "Big Banking's Little $20.8 Trillion Secret," lays bare every banker's darkest secret for the world to see. Simply click HERE for instant access!


Read/Post Comments (6) | Recommend This Article (5)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 07, 2013, at 11:34 AM, JimFL22 wrote:

    BAC is doing its part to cut expenses. My wife had been an employee for over 20 years and they forced her to go part-time. I wonder if the CEO's are cutting their pay? I doubt it!

  • Report this Comment On September 07, 2013, at 4:02 PM, birder1500 wrote:

    BAC does not have any peers. It is at the bottom of the dung heap.

  • Report this Comment On September 08, 2013, at 7:46 AM, Rusty56 wrote:

    Birder - if you feel this way, why don't you put your money where your big mouth is and short the stock.. Come on big talking moron.

  • Report this Comment On September 08, 2013, at 7:49 AM, Rusty56 wrote:

    JIm, don't blame them for cutting your wifes hours, many companies are being forced to do so to avoid providing health insurance to those they previously did not due to Obamacare. Not sure if thats your circumstance but I would bet it is! Thank your idiotic President.

  • Report this Comment On September 09, 2013, at 7:35 PM, lowmaple wrote:

    Rifleman: just because he does not thing BAC is a buy does not mean it is a short candidate. The stock price for instance could flatline and be the same price 5 years from now(not that I believe that) but double his money could be tied up for years instead of a better bank. Obama did not force them to buy countywide.

  • Report this Comment On September 09, 2013, at 11:32 PM, tcgcompliance wrote:

    Conversely one could argue that therefore it has more room for improvement and, if this happens, potentially more upside.

    And Jim, sorry for your wife loosing her position, I too was laid off by them after 10 years, I am so much happier now not having to listen to all that rubbish.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2626104, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/21/2014 8:11:15 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement