Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



3-D Printers Pick Up the Pace on Acquisitions

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Interest in 3-D printing, the process of manufacturing by printing successive layers of material on top of each other to create a finished product, has surged recently, with technology blogs, business journalists, news radio, and even Taco Bell commercials touting the industry as a transformative step forward. Accordingly, the stock price of the two largest 3-D print companies, 3D Systems (NYSE: DDD  ) and Stratasys (NASDAQ: SSYS  ) , have soared, pushing valuations up to dizzying heights. What have the companies been doing with their high-flying stocks? So far, they've mostly been deploying them to rapidly consolidate their fragmented industry. News from the two big players this week shows they have no plans of slowing down.

Stratasys just completed its merger with the popular leader in desktop and personal 3-D printing, MakerBot, in August. On Tuesday, Stratasys announced that it will sell an additional 4 million shares with an option to sell 600,000 more to its underwriters, increasing the number of shares outstanding by more than 10%. The expected $400 million in new capital will be used to continue to pursue new acquisitions as well as to meet financial milestones associated with the MakerBot acquisition.

Let them decorate cake
Whatever acquisition target Stratasys had in mind, it won't be The Sugar Lab. 3D Systems, the oldest and largest developer and manufacturer of 3-D printers and print technology, announced Tuesday that it will acquire The Sugar Lab for an undisclosed amount. The husband-and-wife team behind The Sugar Lab took 3D Systems' Color Jet Printing technology and adapted it to work with a sugar and water solution, creating complex edible confections that can be used to top baked goods or simply admired as art.

While The Sugar Lab's products are beautiful, the company isn't likely to add much to 3D Systems. Unlike recent high-profile acquisitions such as the 3D Systems buyout of metals printer Phenix Systems, which owned around 50 patents related to printing with metals, The Sugar Lab has no intellectual property of its own, and indeed its platform was based on 3D Systems' intellectual property. I'd hazard that the undisclosed motivation for the acquisition may indeed have been as part of a settlement of a patent violation.

If The Sugar Lab adds appreciable value to 3D Systems, it would be largely through promotion and market-building, as the small company has received plenty of favorable press coverage and has worked with celebrity chefs such as Ace of Cakes star Duff Goldman. While printing with sugar is not a technically novel concept, creating 3-D printed foodstuffs will certainly spark the public imagination and drive continued interest in the technology.

At any rate, the acquisition won't put much of a dent in the $250 million in capital that 3D Systems raised through a new public offering back in May. 3D Systems stated at the time that the money raised would be used to fund acquisitions, and even after paying out around $20 million to acquire Phenix Systems, most of this cash is still ready to be deployed.

So who (and what) is next?
If Stratasys and 3D Systems have taught us anything, it's that no company is too big or too small to be bought up in their ongoing quest to consolidate the industry. The past year has seen everything from 3D Systems buying up what's almost literally a mom-and-pop shop to Stratasys completing a merger with Objet, an Israeli company that was at the time the third-largest 3D print company in the world. The only sure thing is that more acquisitions will follow, and soon.

So what does that mean for investors? Some analysts balk at the torrid pace of mergers and acquisitions, fretting that the parent companies will be unable to consolidate their operations successfully, that frequent public offerings dilute existing shareholder value, and that growth rates are kept artificially high by simply buying revenue through acquisition.

Certainly, this acquisition pace can't be kept up forever, but for now, I'm not worried: 3-D printing is still a relatively fragmented industry, and within that industry only 3D Systems and Stratasys are pure-play 3-D printers that have access to public capital markets. I think it's a smart move to take advantage of this access to capital to consolidate control over what is clearly a fast-growing industry. So far, the dramatic growth in free cash flow per share at these companies has easily outpaced the dilutive effects of new share offerings, and I believe today's frenzied pace of acquisitions is actually setting both companies up for longer-term success as they build up competitive moats by expanding their installed base of machines and acquiring more and more intellectual property.

This will help both companies control the industry that The Economist compares to the steam engine and the printing press. Business Insider says it's "the next trillion dollar industry." And everyone from BMW to Nike to the U.S. Air Force is already using it every day. Watch The Motley Fool's shocking video presentation today to learn more about the 3-D print industry, and learn the investing strategy we've used to double our money on these three stocks. Click here to watch now!

Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 11, 2013, at 12:19 PM, analyze224 wrote:

    So, we can we expect the next generation of the Cube to print confections? If its price tag were $50 it could compete with those little bake ovens you buy for children. Given the appearance of the Cube's lackluster marketplace reception, (Amazon, Office Depot, Staples reviews), printing confections might just be its highest and best use!

  • Report this Comment On September 11, 2013, at 1:34 PM, galileo767 wrote:

    Eventually most Bakers and Caterers will all need to own 3D printers to stay competitive.

  • Report this Comment On September 11, 2013, at 2:09 PM, analyze224 wrote:

    Maybe there won't be a need for supermarkets anymore either...(eventually), because there will be small specialty stores perhaps devoting a bit of space to foods that cannot be printed and the remainder of these stores will house 3D printers which will manufacture most food items for sale.

    Or, maybe the stores will be really tiny and sell only sugar and a few other inputs for 3D printers and we will produce all of our food in our homes.

    Sarcasm set aside - there is some legitimacy to 3D printing - but that legitimacy is skewing perceptions.

    The question isn't can you print out a piece of candy if you put sugar, etc, in a printer...Just like the many, many questions that ought to be asked regarding production of anything by a 3D printer - efficiency re cost, time, convenience, quality, etc, etc...What is so skewed about perception now - is that the focus is can it be done? rather than is there good reason to think it will be done better, for less, in less time, across every application.

    Yes, things change and the pace of technology can make your head spin, but hopeful signs in certain specific areas of application of 3D printers is far, far afield from an overarching demonstration that 3D printing technology will eventually transform the production world as we know it.

    Finally, if the world does really change as a result of 3D technologies...the real intellectual property - the developments that will exceed in the demonstration of value are so unlikely to come out of any company whose founders and principals have elected to sell their company for a few million dollars.

    If 3D technologies, the ones that may or may not truly revolutionize the world, exist - or come to exist - you won't see their developers selling out for what would amount to chump change.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2631675, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/24/2016 10:26:30 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,261.45 -131.01 -0.71%
S&P 500 2,164.69 -12.49 -0.57%
NASD 5,305.75 -33.78 -0.63%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

9/23/2016 4:02 PM
DDD $16.40 Down -0.24 -1.44%
3D Systems CAPS Rating: ****
SSYS $22.03 Down -0.42 -1.87%
Stratasys CAPS Rating: ****