Sears Holdings' Incredible Hidden Value

Anybody following Sears Holdings (NASDAQ: SHLD  ) over the last few years knows that several major investors have proclaimed that the value of the real estate holdings vastly exceed the current stock valuation. The rub with Sears remains that the retail operations are difficult for the average investor to separate from the valuation of the assets that go far beyond the real estate holdings. Investor after investor proclaims the company worthless due to a lack of profits from the retail operation, but the company has a vast array of assets worth billions upon billions that are hidden.

In the last week, the stock has soared due to a massive 139-page research report by Baker Street Capital, which owns 1.5 million shares or over $80 million at recent prices. The investment theme hearkens back to the real estate holdings that most investors know haven't led to stock market gains, but some of the research unearthed by Baker Street suggests now could be different.

Though the opinion that Sears is valued favorably to Simon Property (NYSE: SPG  ) or General Growth Properties (NYSE: GGP  ) is nothing new, the research by Baker Street actually unearthed a plethora of discoveries regarding real estate developments that aren't being marketed by the company to investors.

Simon Property and General Growth Properties
One of the biggest outcomes from the advent of online shopping (and, in part, the financial crisis) was the supposed destruction of the mall shopping experience. As the theory goes, consumers were no longer interested in driving to malls to shop when it was so convenient to shop online. Ironically, the mall owners are now telling a different story. Not only are rental rates up at the major malls (ones where Sears owns stores), but also new malls aren't being built. In essence, demand is at a five-year high while supply is at a 35-year low.

Simon Property owns or has an interest in 324 retail properties comprising 241 million square feet. The stock is valued at an incredible $46 billion, further providing reason why Bruce Berkowitz and the Fairholme Fund invested so heavily in Sears. Note that Sears has roughly 250 million square feet of real estate. In addition, Simon Property has over $22 billion in debt while Sears has the real estate assets virtually unencumbered. That places the enterprise value of Simon Property at over $67 billion while Sears has a market cap of only $6 billion with cash and inventory to cover any debt.

Another premium and regional mall owner, General Growth Properties owns 123 malls that encompass 128 million gross square footage. With a market cap of $18.3 billion and net debt of nearly $15 billion, General Growth again trades at a significant premium to Sears. The company is valued at roughly $143 per square foot and closer to $250 when considering the large debt position.

Lackluster retail operations
A common mistake made by retail investors is to invest in a stock based solely on the price-to-sales or price-to-earnings multiple without even analyzing the assets of the stock. The common theme with Sears is to focus on the inability of Eddie Lampert to turn around the retail operations of Sears and Kmart. The typical analyst rehashes the concept that Lampert has constantly under invested in sprucing up stores to attracting consumers. That theme, though, is mostly misplaced as Lampert never had a sole focus to turn around the stores; instead he hoped to develop an online presence, which now ranks only behind Amazon.com and Wal-Mart, while limiting the capital improvements on stores since the plan was to sublease and redevelop the assets anyway.

As an example of the weak retail operations, the company reported a large $194 million net loss, or $1.83 per share. While the adjusted EBITDA loss was only $55 million, it compares negatively to the $116 million gain in the prior year quarter. In general, analysts expect large losses to continue for the next few years.

Have you heard of Seritage?
Even as a long-term investor, it was surprising reading the research from Baker Street regarding the subsidiary Seritage Realty Trust. Not that it hasn't been discussed on numerous occasions that Sears was in the works to sublease space or sell properties, but the vast details regarding the sub-division of anchor pads or the redevelopment of Sears Auto Center outparcels is widely unknown and not marketed by the company.

As a subsidiary of Sears, the company lists the goal as redeveloping over 200 properties in 33 states and covering 18 million square feet. A key investing point for understanding Sears is that the value of the vast real estate holdings is not based on what Sears is currently doing with it, but rather what another retailer could produce out of the same prime space in some of the best malls around the country.

Bottom line
The real estate value proposition appears mostly ignored by the market regardless of compelling investors such as Berkowitz or the intriguing report from Baker Street. On top of that, the valuation propositions compared to General Growth Properties and Simon Property Group should be difficult to ignore. Of course, the key to the value proposition is turning these valuable assets into income earning properties. The details provided by Seritage suggest that the company is farther along in the process than the market realizes and hence value could be unlocked quicker than expected.

The retail space is in the midst of the biggest paradigm shift since mail order took off at the turn of last century. Only those most forward-looking and capable companies will survive, and they'll handsomely reward those investors who understand the landscape. You can read about the 3 Companies Ready to Rule Retail in The Motley Fool's special report. Uncovering these top picks is free today; just click here to read more.


Read/Post Comments (5) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 12, 2013, at 2:25 PM, 45ACPbullseye wrote:

    Hi Mark! Glad to see somebody else who took the time to look at the Baker Street presentation. I wrote about Seritage, Ubiquity, and SHC Realty initiatives back in mid-July. I hope it is still available on beta.fool.com/45ACPbullseye.

    Fyi, TMF published a piece last night that I wrote on this subject: Why Hedge Funds Love This Former Dow Stock.

    I have enjoyed many of your SA pieces as well. Best, Bill Stoller

  • Report this Comment On October 08, 2013, at 10:35 AM, CatchTwentyTwo wrote:

    Mark, the picture you have painted in the several articles I have read by you concerning Sears is really quite impressive. You are a talented writer, but perhaps even more so a financial detective.

  • Report this Comment On May 28, 2014, at 12:41 AM, Vanmusicblues wrote:

    The RE was written up during the merger in 2005. Since then mall RE has declined 17% in value. SHLD has sold off the fine stuff.

    do not test the commentary of the mall owners as to SHLDS property value .they have a conflict of interest

  • Report this Comment On May 28, 2014, at 1:16 AM, Mega wrote:

    "One of the biggest outcomes from the advent of online shopping (and, in part, the financial crisis) was the supposed destruction of the mall shopping experience. As the theory goes, consumers were no longer interested in driving to malls to shop when it was so convenient to shop online. Ironically, the mall owners are now telling a different story."

    The irony is actually that the supposed destruction of the mall shopping experience is actually highly localized to Sears and JCPenney. Which suggests that it isn't a macro problem, it's a retail competence problem.

  • Report this Comment On May 28, 2014, at 1:40 AM, Jonod wrote:

    Have you ever gone to a mall and said to yourself .. "That Sears space is great and would be a great investment!" ... NO.. or even.. if there wasn't a SEARS here there would be a !!! ... no. This is a dead retailer who blew it. They are outdated and dead.

    Real estate is all about what??? location... and an old SEARS location is a death kiss. They barely exist in second rate malls where buyers have no other choice and they are closing stores in them... Their only chance is selling themselves to someone that can totally rebrand and I don't even think that is possible. We should call them "The Ostrich". I hate to be so negative but shorting them into the grave is the only money here in my humble opinion. Real estate value is pennies on the dollar.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2635062, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/18/2014 6:35:37 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Apple's next smart device (warning, it may shock you

Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early-in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!


Advertisement