8 Fascinating Reads

Happy Friday! There are more good news articles, commentaries, and analyst reports on the Web every week than anyone could read in a month. Here are eight fascinating pieces I read this week.

Strategy
The blog Farnam Street points out two types of failure described in the book Mastery:

Think of it this way: There are two kinds of failure. The first comes from never trying out your ideas because you are afraid, or because you are waiting for the perfect time. This kind of failure you can never learn from, and such timidity will destroy you. The second kind comes from a bold and venturesome spirit. If you fail in this way, the hit that you take to your reputation is greatly outweighed by what you learn. Repeated failure will toughen your spirit and show you with absolute clarity how things must be done. In fact, it is a curse to have everything go right on your first attempt. You will fail to question the element of luck, making you think that you have the golden touch. When you do inevitably fail, it will confuse and demoralize you past the point of learning. In any case, to apprentice as an entrepreneur you must act on your ideas as early as possible, exposing them to the public, a part of you even hoping that you'll fail. You have everything to gain.

Dividend boom 
Eddy Elfenbein writes about the surge in dividend payments:

Before we're done, the [S&P 500] dividends paid out in 2013 will probably be more than 50% higher than what was paid out in 2010. That's remarkable.

The dividend payout ratio for the last four quarters is now just over 33%. Except for the depths of the financial crisis, that's the highest ratio in more than 10 years. (During the financial crisis, the ratio climbed not due to higher dividends but to plunging earnings.)

Outlooks
Felix Salmon writes a great profile on financial guru Dave Ramsey, including a debate Ramsey had with Motley Fool writer Brian Stoffel:

Ramsey recently debated that subject on his radio show with Brian Stoffel, a columnist for The Motley Fool, who wrote about that 12% number in the wake of the Twitter fight. Stoffel said 12% was unrealistic; Ramsey said that it wasn't, and that if his listeners had taken his advice and followed it for the past 20 years, "they would have had a pretty strong rate of return." He challenged Stoffel "to analyze that and figure that out," which Stoffel obviously couldn't do on a live radio show.

But here are the numbers, using data from Morningstar. If someone invested equally in four mutual funds corresponding to Ramsey's plan, using the kind of load-charging funds he recommends, over the past 20 years the annualized return would have been 7.6%.

New normal
The Financial Times asks if home ownership in America is losings its allure:

The US home-ownership rate has dropped to an 18-year-low at about 65 per cent -- down from a peak of 70 per cent before the crash -- and economists say it is set to fall as low as 60 per cent. Some industry watchers are now asking if the US, after a multi-decade push toward home ownership, is shifting toward being a nation of renters.

"With the housing bubble bursting, the home-ownership rate was always going to drop. In some respects this has been healthy as the country has been reversing some of the excess. Not everybody should have been homeowners," says Michael Gapen, senior economist at Barclays. "But there is now an open question about where it will settle."

Say my name
The Economist takes a business lesson from the hit show Breaking Bad:

The first lesson from "Breaking Bad" is that high-growth businesses come from unexpected places. Mr White uses his skills as a chemist to revolutionise the slapdash meth industry (he was a researcher before becoming a teacher). He is not alone. William Thorndike of Harvard Business School (HBS) studied eight bosses whose firms outperformed the S&P 500 index more than 20-fold over their business careers. He found that they were all outsiders who brought fresh perspectives on their industries. Clayton Christensen, also at HBS, argues that great entrepreneurs look at the world through a "marginal lens". It so happens that Bill Gates, a university drop-out working in a then marginal bit of the computer industry, started Microsoft in Mr White's home-town, Albuquerque, before moving to Seattle.

What's in a name?
Some polls show a majority of Americans aren't happy with Obamacare. But strip out the name and ask people if they like the Affordable Care Act's individual components, and the answer is a resounding "yes," writes the Los Angeles Times:

Tax credits for small businesses to buy insurance: 88% in favor.

Closing the Medicare drug benefit doughnut hole: 81% in favor.

Extension of dependent coverage to offspring up to age 26: 76% in favor.

Expanding Medicaid: 71% in favor.

Ban on exclusions for preexisting conditions: 66% in favor.

Recovery
Initial unemployment claims are now low by any measure, as the blog Calculated Risk shows

Golden years
Retirement is becoming a dream for many, writes BlackRock:

In this new world of investing, where people are living longer and there is increased economic uncertainty, imagining a relaxing retirement can seem difficult. So difficult that 7% of workers don't plan to retire at all, according to the Employee Benefit Research Institute's 2013 Retirement Confidence Survey. And for those that are thinking about retirement, many are putting it off. 36% of workers report that they expect to retire after age 65. Compare this to 1991, when just 11% of workers expected to retire after age 65.

Enjoy your weekend. 

 

More on the economy 
The Motley Fool's new free report, "Everything You Need to Know About the National Debt," walks you through with step-by-step explanations about how the government spends your money, where it gets tax revenue from, the future of spending, and what a $16 trillion debt means for our future. Click here to read the full report!


Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (24)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On October 04, 2013, at 9:43 AM, bamasaba wrote:

    Well, the polls showing that the majority of Americans aren't happy with Obamacare are skewed in two ways.

    First, there is obviously the group who just hates anything related to Obama; these are the folks who change their answer when you ask them if they instead like the Affordable Care Act or if you ask them about individual provisions.

    The second group that skews the number is liberals who wish that the law created a single payer system. Most of these folks prefer Obamacare to the status-quo, and would answer thusly if the question were slightly rephrased.

    This is a good example of how polling data can be used to show anything.

  • Report this Comment On October 04, 2013, at 6:52 PM, MartyTheCanuck wrote:

    Everybody like the parts of Obamacare that "look" free. Who like the idea of people being left out because of pre-existing conditions ? But how many people are willing to pay hundreds or thousands more in their own premiums, or in taxes to make sure these folks are covered ?

    And why do people with pre-existing conditions are without insurance to begin with ? Because they made wrong choices in the past ? Because they lost their job, without any fault of their own ? Is there a better way to make sure nobody else get into that pool of people with pre-existing conditions, like dissociating the insurance market from the workplace ?

  • Report this Comment On October 06, 2013, at 8:26 AM, cmalek wrote:

    What's in a name?

    A cow pie or a horse muffin will still be crap no matter how much you extol their beneficial values as organic fertilizers.

  • Report this Comment On October 07, 2013, at 7:19 PM, wtatm wrote:

    The problem with the polling data on Obamacare is "at what price?" In some regards, it's like the stock market. A great company does not necessarily equal a great investment. The price you pay for that company and it's subsequent performance will determine whether you've made a great investment or not.

    Although I would be in favor of all of the above items except expending Medicaid... my "favor" is tempered by what such benefits will cost. I have recently been informed that my health coverage (catastrophic + use of an HSA account) is not "Obamacare compliant", even though it provided fine health care coverage for my family. I'm waiting to see what my premiums are going to be before declaring Obamacare a "success". I'm not hopeful...

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2668525, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/20/2014 2:43:34 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Apple's next smart device (warning, it may shock you

Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early-in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!


Advertisement