Fracking Poses New Threat to Homeowners

You probably figure that, when you buy a house, you also own the land on which it sits. Because of a growing but little-known practice, you might be wrong about that. Homebuilders are increasingly retaining the mineral rights beneath residential properties they sell, and then leasing them to oil and gas companies for fracking. DR Horton (NYSE: DHI  ) makes use of this mechanism quite liberally, but it's not the only one: Beazer Homes (NYSE: BZH  )  and other builders are using the tactic, as well.

In some cases, unsuspecting home buyers suffer the consequences before they even complete their home purchase. Some financial institutions have begun denying mortgages for properties where mineral rights have been severed, sometimes even declaring the buyer in default if the encumbrance comes to light after the home financing process is already under way. One insurance company has just announced that it will no longer cover fracking-related damages.

As homeowners gain awareness of this phenomenon, they get angry. In some cases, entire communities are up in arms. Their ire turns not only toward the homebuilders, but also toward the fracking companies that lease the land, including ConocoPhilips (NYSE: COP  ) and Anadarko Petroleum (NYSE: APC  ) . Communities feel misled, leading them to mistrust claims about fracking's safety.

In some states, this erosion in public confidence is coming home to roost in the form of anti-fracking ballot measures. Several cities in Colorado -- including Broomfield, Lafayette, Boulder, and Fort Collins -- have anti-fracking measures on their November ballots. Perhaps the voters in those cities heard about the Denver community where builder Oakwood homes leased out all the underlying land to Anadarko.

Should these ballot measures pass, they will impose a 5-year fracking moratorium on oil and gas companies in some areas. Surely that can't be good for business. As if to underscore that point, the Colorado Oil and Gas Association is spending more than $600,000 to combat these ballot measures.

Considering how controversial fracking already is, mineral rights retention could undermine it further in the public eye, while also taking down the reputations of the companies involved. Watch the video below to learn more about this under-the-radar issue that could have serious consequences.

More natural resources
With all the scrambling for natural gas rights, you might be inclined to think that it's the most precious resource in the history of the world. But it's not. Nor is gold. Or even oil. The most precious natural resource is more valuable than both of those. Combined. And here's the crazy part: One emerging company already has the market cornered... and stands to make in-the-know investors boatloads of cash. We reveal all in our special 100% FREE report, The 21st Century's Most Precious Natural Resource. Just click here for instant access!


Read/Post Comments (5) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On October 23, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Free1776 wrote:

    People all across the country have purchased land without buying the mineral rights. In the south, coal companies have owned the mineral rights for large swaths of land for 100 years. This is not new.

  • Report this Comment On October 23, 2013, at 2:31 PM, lagrandpro wrote:

    The headline is sensationalist and misleading. It's not fracking and all the mythical problems pushed by enviros that are the risk, but simply the stripping out of mineral rights from homeowners' titles which is at issue.

  • Report this Comment On October 23, 2013, at 2:45 PM, ladygeo1492 wrote:

    I agree that the headline is sensationalist. Very misleading. As someone who has been in the oil business for many years I can tell you that fracture treating wells has been going on in Oklahoma for over a century and no one's home has ever been damaged. Stimulation happens generally close to a mile or more beneath the surface. People and companies who penalize others because minerals are severed need to educate themselves on what well stimulation is and how it works before making such judgments.

  • Report this Comment On October 24, 2013, at 11:50 AM, lacerz wrote:

    Environmentalist wackos pose a threat to the economy, which impacts people's abilities to own homes.

  • Report this Comment On October 24, 2013, at 2:31 PM, monkota wrote:

    The headline is very misleading. In the Bakken, the fracking process is taking place almost 2 miles below the surface. I have not seen any evidence of any homes or buildings being damaged in anyway, by the fracking process.

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 2686133, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 7/30/2014 5:43:27 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement