The Good, Bad, and Ugly of VIVUS' Earnings

VIVUS (NASDAQ: VVUS  ) reported earnings last night. As we could have guessed from Eisai's sales report for Arena Pharmaceuticals' (NASDAQ: ARNA  ) competing obesity drug, Belviq, the downside trumped the good news for VIVUS.

Good
Prescriptions of Qsymia were up 35% quarter over quarter. Annualize that out and you're looking at growth of 232% year over year. There aren't too many companies that would turn down that kind of growth.

Bad
Net sales of Qsymia were only up 15% quarter over quarter. The sales growth doesn't match the prescription growth because VIVUS is giving an increasingly larger number of free trials and reduced-price drugs. Of the prescriptions shipped in the third quarter, 26% were free while 56% offered at some kind of discount. The cheaper medication is an investment in the long-term sales growth, but it's hampering revenue right now.

Ugly
Even looking at gross sales without the discounts, VIVUS only sold $11.1 million worth of Qsymia in the quarter. That's not going to pay the bills. In fact, VIVUS is cutting 17% of its workforce to reduce costs.

Jumpstarting sales
I don't know what the level above hyper-growth is, but that's what VIVUS needs to hit. It's not hard to see how Qsymia, Arena Pharmaceuticals' Belviq, or Orexigen's (NASDAQ: OREX  ) Contrave could be a blockbuster given the size of the obesity market. I could see them all reaching blockbuster status.

But there are issues that VIVUS and Eisai -- and later Takeda Pharmaceutical, which will sell Contrave for Orexigen -- have to work through before the obesity drugs can reach their full potential: getting doctors to prescribe the drugs and getting patients to pay for it.

VIVUS has coverage for 38% of people in the U.S. covered by commercial insurance and says it's still on track to get to 50% coverage by the end of the year. Equally important is moving coverage from Tier 3, where co-pays are often $50-$100, to Tier 2, where co-pays are often in the $20-$30 range. Patients that don't see substantial results after a few months are more likely to stick with the drug if the co-pays are substantially lower.

Getting doctors to prescribe the drug is somewhat a function of time; the longer the drugs are on the market without safety concerns, the more likely doctors will prescribe the drug. But having more boots on the ground hocking the drug to doctors certainly couldn't hurt.

Arena and Orexigen have a distinct advantage here because they have backing from a big pharma partner. VIVUS' management said it's in talks with various companies to establish a partnership but wasn't willing to layout a timeframe for when they might be complete.

I think VIVUS can turn things around, but how long that takes and at what cost to current shareholders remains to be seen.

This is what real hyper-growth looks like
The Motley Fool's chief technology officer has spotted a tech stock growing twice as fast as Google and Facebook, and more than three times as fast as Amazon.com and Apple. Watch our jaw-dropping investor alert video today to find out why he's putting $117,238 of his own money on the table, and why he's so confident this will be a huge winner in 2013 and beyond. Just click here to watch!


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (0)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 06, 2013, at 5:31 PM, RSRdriver wrote:

    At least Vivus has a drug that works!

    They will get out of trouble because of that.

    Arena on the other hand is headed for sub$3 and bankruptcy with the useless drug they have.

  • Report this Comment On November 06, 2013, at 7:17 PM, gazoo99 wrote:

    RSRdribble strikes again with useless comments.

    Must have gotten an As*Wo*p*ing on VVUS today!

    What's the matter..... your cornflakes all messed up?

  • Report this Comment On November 07, 2013, at 7:17 AM, hengstrom wrote:

    I don't think that Qsymia needs hyper growth. Instead, I think the Vivus needs to try to get margins on sales expanded. The challenge here, IMO, is the Qsymia is a combination of 2 generic drugs and if this is the reason why their margins are under so much pressure then that is a big problem. With 150,000 scripts last quarter, Vivus should have had $30m in revenue - but instead have 1/3 of that revenue.

    Arena/Eisai's Belviq's margins are much higher. Is this because Belviq is an NCE with no generic equivalent?

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2715646, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/19/2014 11:41:13 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement