This Hedge Fund Manager Hates the Fed but Doesn't Love Gold

Criticizing the Federal Reserve and loving gold seem to go hand in hand. Former U.S. Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), a noted opponent of the Fed, dedicates a large portion of his portfolio to gold, mostly by owning shares of gold miners such as Goldcorp (NYSE: GG  ) . Hedge fund manager David Einhorn has attacked what he calls the Fed's "Jelly Donut Policy," and has put a big chunk of his fund in the Market Vectors Gold Miner ETF (NYSEMKT: GDX  ) , while John Paulson has long held a big position in the SPDR Gold Trust (NYSEMKT: GLD  ) .

But Mark Spitznagel, CIO of Universa Investments -- a hedge fund with about $6 billion in assets -- isn't a big fan of gold. In his book The Dao of Capital, Spitznagel strongly opposes the Fed, blaming it for our current economic malaise, and a likely crash to follow; still, he doesn't share his fellow critics' enthusiasm for owning the precious metal.

Gold as the anti-Fed play
Traditionally, gold is regarded as a way to bet against the Fed -- more specifically, to bet against its current policy decisions. The Fed's critics allege that, through several rounds of quantitative easing, the Fed has debased -- even destroyed -- the U.S. dollar. Gold, which backed the dollar at least partially until 1971, stands as a sort of alternative currency.

An ounce of gold today will still be an ounce of gold 10 years from now, but a U.S. dollar will probably not have the same purchasing power in 2023. This stationary property of gold fuels some investors' enthusiasm for it, but at the same time, it serves to draw in its critics.

Warren Buffett, in his 2011 letter to investors, observed that all the world's gold was worth about $9.6 trillion. If an investor had such a large sum of money, he or she could, in theory, purchase all the gold in the world -- or all the farmland in the U.S., along with 16 ExxonMobils. In 100 years' time, the investor who bought the farmland and ExxonMobils would've generated many trillions of dollars worth of profits, whereas the one who bought the gold would still just be holding gold. When you get down to it, gold just isn't a productive asset.

How gold could threaten civilization
Spitznagel shares Paul and Einhorn's disdain for the Fed, but he largely agrees with Buffett. In fact, though he acknowledges that gold is the "perfect medium of exchange" and a great long-term store of value, he warns that gold obsession is unhealthy, even dangerous, for society. Instead, he would rather see investors put their money into productive assets, though he admits that it's a difficult thing to do right now.

This is what Spitznagel told me:

I can't begrudge anyone for their gold holdings. As dollars are clearly a decaying asset, there's sound economic logic behind gold's long-term appreciation. But if everyone just invested in gold, civilization would slowly come to an end.

He continued:

I would hate for everyone to be a gold bug; that would be a disaster. People need to invest in productive, real assets, such as farmland. We can thank the Fed that this is such a scary thing to do these days -- it is the real paradox of Keynesianism.

Moreover, while Spitznagel believes gold will maintain its value over the long run, he's concerned that investors holding gold today will get burned:

There's lots of noise in its valuation, due to momentum investors. How many people acquire gold only after it goes up, and dump it when it doesn't? I'd recommend the opposite strategy. By definition, gold, with zero intrinsic value, is a pure greater-fool investment, requiring a greater fool than you who is willing to take it off your hands. It has value only because we all agree that it does.

Should you have some gold in your portfolio?
As an inflation hedge, holding a token amount of gold makes sense for any portfolio. In the event of severe inflation, gold's price appreciation could help to offset the damaging effects to any cash or bond holdings.

But as Buffett notes, buying gold isn't investing, and investors shouldn't overload their portfolio with the yellow metal. Certainly, among Fed critics, there seems to be an unhealthy obsession with owning it. Hopefully, some of these investors will consider Spitznagel's advice.

Learning from Buffett
Warren Buffett has made billions through his investing and he wants you to be able to invest like him. Through the years, Buffett has offered up investing tips to shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway. Now you can tap into the best of Warren Buffett's wisdom in a new special report from The Motley Fool. Click here now for a free copy of this invaluable report.


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (0)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 11, 2013, at 12:18 AM, mathisje wrote:

    Exactly why does this article have special merit? Hedge fund managers always bash the Fed and haven't had a great deal of success since 2008. Is 'dollars are a decayin asset' another way of saying investments need to account for inflation? Earthshaking! Gold may be protection, but serving has a long term appreciating asset is not universally accepted. Hard core gold bugs deserve what they get, I'll stick with equities.

  • Report this Comment On November 13, 2013, at 6:51 PM, neocolonialist wrote:

    I think there are much greater concerns than inflation, although I think that concern has been drastically under appreciated as well. Inflation will hit like a hammer at some point in the next 5 years, that is a mathematical certainty. There are nearly 4 trillion reasons that make that quite clear. We stand to look back on the late 70's/early 80's in awe of their reasonable inflation rates. But, the bigger concern is the standing of the dollar as a viable currency. China and Russia are more than happy to dismiss the dollar today, and I think that is largely political posturing/wishful thinking. But, long term, they aren't wrong. The US seems to be hell bent on devaluing the dollar to zero. And, it looks like they are succeeding. As soon as the Fed (currently the largest buyer of US treasuries and mortgage backed securities) becomes the only buyer of US treasuries, then the ponzi scheme of QE will be exposed. Given that our government would rather die than cut real spending, it is an absolute certainty that the dollar will fail, and likely within the next decade. When that happens, anyone holding dollar based assets (US company equities included) is going to get hurt quite badly. Knowing exactly when the hammer will drop on inflation or the dollar is hard to gauge, but interest rates rising will be a sure sign the end is nigh.

    I am willing to admit gold may not be the best hedge, but then, what is?

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 2720729, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 7/29/2014 5:19:14 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement