By the Time Apple Finally Releases Its Smart TV, It Could Be too Late

Apple's (NASDAQ: AAPL  ) management has promised new devices in 2014, and many investors may have presumed that a television set would be among them. Yet perhaps not: Apple's long-anticipated TV has reportedly been delayed yet again.

At this point, investors should be wondering if Apple's effort come too late. Microsoft's (NASDAQ: MSFT  ) new Xbox seems to have all the features an Apple smart TV would offer, while cable providers themselves, notably Comcast (NASDAQ: CMCSA  ) , are slowly moving into the space themselves.

Apple's TV: delayed again?
Investors have been waiting for Apple to release a smart TV for at least four years. Since 2011, Piper Jaffray's Gene Munster has predicted an Apple TV set every single year, and every single year, he's been wrong. Still, he remains undeterred: Munster is now anticipating an Apple smart TV in 2014. Munster's credibility would be shot by now, except he predicted both the iPhone and the iPad before their debuts.

But Munster could be wrong at least one more time. KGI Securities' Ming-Chi Kuo thinks Apple is unlikely to release a TV before 2015, while NPD Display Search believes that, although Apple has the manufacturing lined up to produce the TV, it continues to struggle with securing the necessary content deals.

Microsoft's new video game console is really a smart TV
But 2015 is a long time from now, and if Apple waits until then, its window of opportunity may have closed. Microsoft, in particular, is about to deliver a product that seems to offer all the features a would-be Apple smart TV buyer could ever want.

Somewhat confusingly, Microsoft's Xbox One is actually the third console in the Xbox line, but its name is intended to embody its purpose -- serving as the central hub of a living room entertainment setup. In addition to playing video games, the Xbox One is chock-full of high-tech, entertainment features.

Using the second-generation Kinect, owners of Microsoft's device will be able to control their cable box with voice commands and hand gestures: saying, "watch HBO" will instantly change the channel. Beyond cable, Microsoft's console offers all the standard streaming apps, in addition to video chat Skype calls and integration with fantasy sports.

With a hefty $500 price tag, non-gamers may be unwilling to pay for the device. But as expensive as Microsoft's Xbox One is, Apple's all-in-one smart TV is likely to cost several times as much.

Comcast's cable box is getting much better
But for Comcast subscribers, having a smart TV or a smart TV add-on like the Xbox could soon be superfluous. Comcast has begun to aggressively move into the technology itself: Its new X2 platform offers many of the same features as Microsoft's Xbox, including access to apps, voice commands, and personalized recommendations. Netflix even wants to get in on Comcast's new platform.

Moreover, Comcast's platform is cloud-based, meaning that future technological improvements can be rolled out to its entire subscriber base with ease. In the past, Comcast's subscribers with old cable boxes may have had to suffer with a substandard interface; going forward, that shouldn't be a problem.

Of course, Comcast is just one provider, but it is the largest, with about one-fifth of the paid-TV subscribers in the U.S. Moreover, what it does is likely to become a trend -- with Comcast moving so heavily into tech, its competitors will be forced to follow. Indeed, DirecTV has already begun to push voice-based technology.

Does the TV really matter?
Without seeing Apple's TV set, it's impossible to say for certain whether or not it will be a revolutionary device. The alternatives offered by Microsoft and Comcast seem promising, but Apple could -- at least in theory -- still have something to blow the competition away.

Yet the more crucial question is: Does it even matter? TVs are a low-margin business, one that's burned high-end companies like Sony, Panasonic, and Sharp in recent years. Consumers generally wait five years or more to replace their TV, and when they do, they may only buy one or two per household.

Morgan Stanley's Katy Huberty estimated last year that an Apple TV could add $4.50 to Apple's earnings, but I think investors should remain far more skeptical. Assuming the device does get released, and beats back the growing list of competitors, it's not going to come close to the iPhone in terms of earnings power.

More growth stories from The Motley Fool
Tired of watching your stocks creep up year after year at a glacial pace? Motley Fool co-founder David Gardner, founder of the No. 1 growth stock newsletter in the world, has developed a unique strategy for uncovering truly wealth-changing stock picks. And he wants to share it, along with a few of his favorite growth stock superstars, WITH YOU! It's a special 100% FREE report called "6 Picks for Ultimate Growth." So stop settling for index-hugging gains... and click HERE for instant access to a whole new game plan of stock picks to help power your portfolio.


Read/Post Comments (6) | Recommend This Article (0)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 16, 2013, at 11:51 AM, larryw101 wrote:

    With as many negative articles as this guy writes, he has be shorting Apple. No one could possibly be this biased and say they have no position in the stock.

    Shame on Motley for this continuous stream of garbage journalism.

  • Report this Comment On November 16, 2013, at 11:58 AM, Mathman6577 wrote:

    Apple does not need the iTV. They make 80% of their profits from iPhone and iPad.

  • Report this Comment On November 16, 2013, at 2:39 PM, Dube88 wrote:

    The author probably would have said the same thing about an Apple MP3 player prior to the iPod announcement.

  • Report this Comment On November 16, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Mega wrote:

    "TVs are a low-margin business, one that's burned high-end companies like Sony, Panasonic, and Sharp in recent years."

    Yeah, low-end phones, tablets and computers also have low margins.

    Hint: Apple doesn't sell low-end electronics with low margins.

  • Report this Comment On November 16, 2013, at 4:41 PM, Hefslaugh wrote:

    Apple has always been about quality and margins. When (if) the Apple TV is released it will sell huge numbers and set a new standard for in-home entertainment. They will not release the product if that is not the case. It should be apparent by now that they are the innovators, the rest of these companies only imitate.

  • Report this Comment On November 16, 2013, at 4:49 PM, DanManners wrote:

    If I am ever on my deathbead, please Mr. Mattera, don't come visit me. I will have enough problems.

    I was reading my Sylvia Plath novel but it was not depressing enough so I decided to read a Mattera post. I rate this 5 kleenexs. Great work as usual.

    I can't wait to read Mr. Mattera's next article on what happens when Iran gets the bomb. Should be uplifting.

    Look, I am an old man and I was out with this even older woman the other night. She had an iPhone. Does that mean iPhones are only for older people or they have lost their cool? No. Anyway we traded bucket lists and had a wonderful night.

    No on to the TV. Everything Apple does is a little late. I remember MSFT having a tablet long before Apple. What Apple does is learn from the early developers mistakes and improves on them. Also think of which companies started a new category but are now the leading company in that category? Are you still buying planes made from Wilber and Orvilles plane manufacturing company? And if so are they the leading company? And if so are there any other companies that make planes and are profitable?

    It's like Apple can't go up in price unless they are the leader in everything. Meanwhile, Apple can buy back 30% of their company. That will make the stock go up. If these nice new products make more cash, Apple can buy even more stock back. That is it. Make cash buy back shares. Not too complicated. It already went up alot due to the first buybacks.

    IF there is some nice margins built into the TV and it is truly nice with some neat unique gimmicks and ties well into the network, it will sell. The customer base is so large they will make money. So if they add $ 3 to earnings? Fine. Three or four things adding $ 1 to $3 to earnings each and you have more buybacks.

    Stop already. I bet your kids all see a shrink. Apple is the dog that everyone likes to kick. Rodney Dangerfield said his wife, kids, and even the dog, treated him like a dog. He said his analyst told him to get off the couch.

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 2728300, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/18/2014 11:09:42 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement