What Everybody Ought to Know About Gilead and Johnson & Johnson's New Hepatitis C Drugs

A new class of oral drugs for curing hepatits C is hitting the markets this winter, displacing injectible predecessors and ushering in treatments that are shorter and in some cases avoid side-affect riddled interferon.

With Johnson & Johnson's (NYSE: JNJ  ) Olysio already winning FDA approval in November, Gilead Sciences's (NASDAQ: GILD  ) sofosbuvir set to get the nod next week, and a range of competing drugs from AbbVie (NYSE: ABBV  ) , Bristol-Myers Squibb (NYSE: BMY  ) and Merck (NYSE: MRK  ) coming along quickly, here's what you need to know about them.

1. They work better, but not for everyone
This new class of drugs is more effective than the prior-generation injectibles, which include Incivek, now fully controlled by Johnson following Vertex's exit, and Victrelis, made by Merck. Both Gilead and J&J's new drugs are approved for 12-week treatment courses, far shorter than the 24- to 48-week courses for those predecessors. But both Gilead's and J&J's drugs don't cure everyone.

In studies, Gilead's sofosbuvir, which will likely be approved as a combination therapy alongside ribavirin, cured roughly 89% of patients with genotype 1, the most common genotype in America. Based on Phase 3 results, J&J's Olysio cures 84% of cases, but stumbles in patients with the Q80K polymorphism, curing just 58%.

"Given the high frequency of the Q80K polymorphism in the U.S. population and its significant impact on rates of SVR12, DAVP is recommending that all GT1a patients be screened for the Q80K polymorphism. Alternative treatment options should be considered for patients found to be infected with this polymorphic variant," according to the FDA's advisory panel committee recommendation.

That should significantly reduce Olysio's appeal, given that nearly 50% of those with hepatitis C, genotype 1 have Q80K.

2. They come with fewer side effects, but still rely on interferon and ribavirin
The target for all of these drugmakers remains a therapy that is free of side-effect laden interferon and ribavirin. If approved on Dec. 8, Gilead's drug will do away with interferon in treating patients with hepatitis genotypes 2 and 3, but interferon will still be dosed alongside ribavirin for the majority of Americans. Meanwhile, J&J's Olysio still relies on both interferon and ribavirin.

One of the closest to a truly interferon- and ribavirin-free therapy appears to be Bristol. Bristol's drug daclatasvir is being considered for approval in Japan for use in combination with Bristol's asunaprevir for the tough-to-treat genotype 1b population. That population accounts for 70% of Japanese hepatitis cases. and Bristol's interferon- and ribavirin-free, two-drug combination cleared the disease nearly 85% of the time.

3. Fewer pills, easier regimen
It's not just interferon and ribavirin that make it tough for patients to stick to their drug regimen -- it's the dosing, too. The dosing of multiple drugs and injections with varying treatment schedules makes it hard for patients to adhere to protocols. That can cause them to drop out of treatment, fail to clear the disease, or worse, choose to avoid treatment altogether. As a result, drugmakers are focusing on one-pill solutions.

Unfortunately, current treatments from Gilead and J&J are multi-pill, which is better, but not ideal. However, one pill treatments should be coming soon. In November, Gilead reported data from a Phase 2 trial showing that 95% of patients were cured by a single, once-daily pill combining sofosbuvir and another Gilead drug, ledipasvir.

4.  Increasingly expensive treatment
Some doctors will embrace off-label combinations of sofosbuvir with either daclatasvir or Olysio. Those combinations have shown impressive results in phase 2 -- so impressive that European regulators have given the nod for compassionate use of daclatasvir, despite Bristol not yet filing for EU approval.

Interim data from a phase 2 trial combining Olysio with sofosbuvir in patients with liver disease who had failed prior treatment are also remarkable. In that study, the combination delivered a 100% cure rate four weeks following a 12-week course of treatment.

While those combinations offer hope for the most critical cases, they pose a big question for patients and insurers. Analysts peg pricing of Olysio at $67,000 for 12 weeks, and estimates for sofosbuvir are running as high as $100,000 for 12 weeks. For comparison, the cost to treat patients with an interferon and ribavirin combination runs roughly $15,000 to $20,000.

5.  Hypercompetitive marketplace
Gilead, J&J, and Bristol are looking over their shoulders at AbbVie and Merck. Both companies have promising late-stage trials ongoing for treating hepatitis C, with AbbVie guiding for a Q2, 2014 filing with the FDA. In a Phase 3 trial, AbbVie's 3 drug, non-interferon, combination cured 95% of patients with genotype 1. And Merck's MK-5172, combined with MK-8742, produced a cure rate between 96% and 100% in a small Phase 2 trial, prompting the FDA to grant the therapy breakthrough status.

That means investors, patients, and doctors have a lot to consider over the coming year as all these contenders vie for a share of a market Express Scripts thinks will quadruple by the end of 2015.

A growth stock to watch closely
This incredible tech stock is growing twice as fast as Google and Facebook, and more than three times as fast as Amazon.com and Apple. Watch our jaw-dropping investor alert video today to find out why The Motley Fool's chief technology officer is putting $117,238 of his own money on the table, and why he's so confident this will be a huge winner in 2013 and beyond. Just click here to watch!


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 06, 2013, at 10:26 AM, drstocks1 wrote:

    J and Js drug is a protease inhibitor. Its class was already tested by vertex and merck and gave dismal results. Gileads drug is a polymerase inhibitor a far more powerful drug. Twelve weeks of treatment actually produced 91% cure, intent to treat, data just updated and works for all genotype one patients, where as J and Js drug has limited use. In additon genotype two and three patients 30% of population have over 90% cure with just oral therapy sobosovir and ribavirin. Gilead is the WINNER big time.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2753677, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/22/2014 2:32:55 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement