Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



How the Fed Is Choosing Bank of America's Profits Over Your Savings

The Federal Reserve's near-zero interest rate policy was designed to spur the economy out of the doldrums of the Great Recession. One unintended consequence though is that it's protecting profit margins at the nation's largest retail banks -- notably at Bank of America (NYSE: BAC  ) , Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC  ) , and JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM  )  -- while crushing returns for savers.

The mechanics of what's happening
Retail banks make money by collecting deposits and then using that cash to make loans. The bank charges a greater interest rate on the loans than it pays on the deposits, and the result is the rough equivalent of gross margins (banks, being complicated, call it "net interest margins").

In the third quarter, Wells Fargo reported its net interest margin at 3.38%. That represents $10.7 billion dollars. Bank of America didn't fare as well, reporting $10.5 billion of net interest income on a margin of 2.44%. JPMorgan reported $10.7 billion.

Combined, these banks made $31.9 billion from collecting deposits and making loans. They were able to do this in the lowest interest rate environment in memory. And yet, despite the low rates, the net interest margins at banks are actually increasing. 

And increasingly steadily:

What's driving the increase? Simply put, money that historically would have been paid to bank depositors, i.e., savers, is now simply staying put on these corporate balance sheets.

Since total interest income peaked in the fourth quarter of 2007, this revenue stream has declined by 37.5% industry-wide. This makes perfect sense as interest rates declined as a result of Fed policies. 

Total interest expense, though -- that is, money paid to depositors -- declined over 86% during the same time period!

Assuming for a moment what could have been, if total interest expense would have declined the same 37.5% as total interest income, an additional $47 billion would be distributed to depositors every quarter. 

That's $47 billion every quarter to consumers and businesses across the country. But that's not the current reality. The reality is that this money stays with the banks -- the same banks who brought on the financial crisis in the first place.

The takeaway
The Federal Reserve is administered by economists, academics, and policy makers much smarter than me. My argument here is not necessarily for or against a near-zero interest rate policy, quantitative easing, or any of the other responses to the financial crisis. But as an observer, this is the reality.  

If you have cash in a savings account, you're losing money. Inflation is currently quite low, but interest paid on CDs and savings is even lower. Every day that your cash sits in those accounts is another day for inflation to eat away at the real value of your money.

Rates, being essentially zero, really have nowhere to go but up. When that happens, we should fully expect the blue and red lines in the chart above to move upwards. The question for bank shareholders and depositors is which line will move up faster.

If the Federal Reserves policies and actions have shown us anything over the past five years, it's that policymakers favor strengthening the banks more than the savers. In my view, I'd anticipate the banks further gaining the upper hand as rates rise.

Don't be surprised if bank net interest margins continue the march on the chart from the lower left to the upper right. That's great news for Bank of America, but unfortunate for your savings account.

How to ride the next generation of banks when rates rise
The golden age of banking is dead. But if you want to learn how to take advantage of the impending bank renaissance, click below to discover the one company leading the way. You see, this fast-growing company is poised to disrupt big banking's centuries-old practices. And it stands to make early investors like YOU a fortune... if you act now. Our brand-new investor alert, "Big Banking's Little $20.8 Trillion Secret," lays bare every banker's darkest secret for the world to see. Simply click HERE for instant access!

Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 07, 2013, at 10:45 AM, jeffg wrote:

    Banks' interest expense is overwhelmingly related to borrowed money, not depositors.

    Corporate checking accounts pay zero interest; no change from historical practice.

    Personal checking accounts pay none or negligible interest; no change.

    Personal savings accounts pay a puny rate of interest and always have.

    CD's do have about 1% for a 1 year CD.

    The Fed has indeed helped the banks, but by lowering the cost of the banks' borrowing. The saver/investor has suffered.

    I'm not a banker and own none of the stocks mentioned.

  • Report this Comment On December 07, 2013, at 12:15 PM, Hookookadoo wrote: is uneducated hype media articles like these that drive me bonkers.

    FACT: Its easer for banks to make money when interest rates are high not low. Has been that way for the last 150 years. This is not a secret. It is Banking 101. Thus, the Fed keeping rates low HURTS the banks all else being equal.

    Take a look at the slope of the green net interest income line in Q4 of 2009. It starts trending DOWN for the first time since 1984! Repeat...since 2009(4 years ago) net interest income has been on a gradual decline.

    Uh, now, what was the author's point?

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2752389, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/27/2016 1:43:39 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 4 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,094.83 -166.62 -0.91%
S&P 500 2,146.10 -18.59 -0.86%
NASD 5,257.49 -48.26 -0.91%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

9/26/2016 4:01 PM
BAC $15.09 Down -0.43 -2.77%
Bank of America CAPS Rating: ****
JPM $65.78 Down -1.47 -2.19%
JPMorgan Chase CAPS Rating: ****
WFC $44.88 Down -0.86 -1.88%
Wells Fargo CAPS Rating: ****