Can Anyone Kill the Air Force's A-10 Warthog?

One of the heroes of Tom Clancy's Red Storm Rising, the A-10 "Warthog" may soon fly off into the sunset.

Sunset for the A-10 Thunderbolt II? Source: Wikimedia Commons.

First flown by manufacturer Fairchild-Republic in 1972, and bearing the official name "Thunderbolt II," the A-10 was designed as a "tank buster" to blunt the edge of an armored Soviet invasion of Western Europe. But the world has changed a lot since then.

For one thing, with orders in decline, Fairchild had to begin shuttering factories in the 1980s, and was sold to German insurance giant Allianz in 1999. Subsequently sold and resold, it wound up in the hands of Israeli defense contractor Elbit Systems (NASDAQ: ESLT  ) , where it remains today.

The A-10's own future faced similar uncertainty. In 2009, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen backed development of the Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT  ) F-35 Lightning II fighter jet as a one-size-fits-all warplane that would make other aircraft redundant. Puissant in aerial combat and ground support roles alike, the F-35 was designed in part to make single-mission combat aircraft like the A-10 obsolete.

A-10's BFG asks: Who you callin' obsolete? Source: Wikimedia Commons.

Today, hardly a day goes by without some rumor surfacing about the A-10 being marked for retirement. In fact, as recently as October, the Air Force mused publicly that if it were allowed to remove its 326 A-10s from service, it could save $3.5 billion in maintenance costs over the course of five years. That would be enough cash to buy roughly three dozen of hypermodern F-35 stealth fighters from Lockheed ...

But is the A-10 really headed for retirement?

Friends in high places
Not if the U.S. Congress has anything to say about it. No sooner had the Air Force begun making noises about eliminating the A-10, than 33 lawmakers got together and signed a letter to Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel demanding that the Warthog be saved.

Not if the Army has anything to say about it: In November, Army Chief of Staff Gen. Raymond Odierno weighed in  with a spirited defense of his brother service's warplane, arguing "The A-10 is the best close-air support platform we have today."

And not if taxpayers have anything to say about it, either. On Facebook, a group of some 4,900 citizens have "liked" a community page titled "Save the A-10," which not only offers PETA-like pleas to save the Warthog, but decries its nemesis, the F-35, as "inadequate for the job."

Who will win the day?
The A-10's defenders may get their wish, too. Last week, a small defense contractor by the name of CPI Aerostructures (NYSEMKT: CVU  ) confirmed that it has just received $15 million worth of parts orders from Boeing (NYSE: BA  ) . Their object: to build structural assemblies on subcontract, helping Boeing to upgrade the wings on the Air Force's A-10 fleet.

So as of today, it looks like the money is still flowing. And so long as the money's flowing, the A-10 will keep flying.

Will the A-10 keep flying? So far, so good. Source Wikimedia Commons.


Pick the investments with staying power
Fairchild-Republic's A-10 Warthog has ruled the battlefield for 41 years and counting -- and may stick around for decades to come. And wouldn't you love it if every company you owned had similar staying power? As every savvy investor knows, Warren Buffett didn't make billions by betting on fly by-night companies. He isolated his best few ideas, bet big, and rode them to riches, hardly ever selling. You deserve the same. That's why our CEO, legendary investor Tom Gardner, has permitted us to reveal The Motley Fool's 3 Stocks to Own Forever. These picks are free today! Just click here now to uncover the three companies we love. 

Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 08, 2013, at 6:42 PM, duuude1 wrote:


    What an amazing piece of basic, robust, functional engineering. Focus on the fundamentals and don't worry about superficial crap like keeping shareholders happy - oops, we're talking about planes here right?


  • Report this Comment On December 09, 2013, at 4:44 PM, TMFDitty wrote:

    This is the best of both worlds then -- I suspect Elbit shareholders are plenty happy this year. Their stock is up twice the S&P's gain, and pays a tidy 2.3% dividend to boot.


Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2756863, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/27/2016 1:52:21 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,228.13 133.30 0.74%
S&P 500 2,159.95 13.85 0.65%
NASD 5,301.76 44.27 0.84%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

9/27/2016 1:36 PM
BA $131.39 Up +0.82 +0.63%
Boeing CAPS Rating: ****
CVU $6.56 Up +0.07 +1.01%
CPI Aerostructures CAPS Rating: *****
ESLT $95.62 Down -0.37 -0.39%
Elbit Systems CAPS Rating: ****
LMT $246.65 Up +1.12 +0.46%
Lockheed Martin CAPS Rating: ****