The Global Warming Debate Rages, but Both Sides Can Agree on This

The debate over global warming continues to rage, and with numerous large clean-energy options gathering momentum, 2014 could be a year hot with policy changes.

Regardless of your position on the global-warming issue, carbon extraction will cost you. ExxonMobil added CO2 emission costs to its recently released The Outlook for Energy: A View to 2040. Stranded carbon assets are also a real risk faced by oil, natural gas, and coal companies if additional costs are added to the extraction of the hydrocarbons. 

And no matter your stance on global warming, clean-energy sources would be welcomed if their prices were comparable to those derived from hydrocarbons. The year 2014 could be the start of competitive solar energy, with solar costs being halved since 2010. Additionally, the spread of residential solar leasing from companies like SolarCity (NASDAQ: SCTY  ) and SunPower (NASDAQ: SPWR  ) have allowed customers to access solar-powered electricity cheaper than they could secure from local utilities.

Surely, 2014 could be the start of the green revolution, and both sides of the global-warming debate can agree the trend is beneficial for everyone. 

Make money in 2014... invest here
The market stormed out to huge gains across 2013, leaving investors on the sidelines burned. However, opportunistic investors can still find huge winners. The Motley Fool's chief investment officer has just hand-picked one such opportunity in our new report: "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2014." To find out which stock it is and read our in-depth report, simply click here. It's free!

This segment is from Tuesday's edition of "Digging for Value," in which sector analysts Joel South and Taylor Muckerman discuss energy and materials news with host Alison Southwick. The twice-weekly show can be viewed on Tuesdays and Thursdays. It can also be found on Twitter, along with our extended coverage of the energy and materials sectors @TMFEnergy.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 19, 2013, at 12:32 AM, predfern wrote:

    Alternative energies will never be economically viable because of the low capacity factor. The temperature has been flat for almost 17 years and we are about to go into the next little ice age due to sharply decreasing solar irradiance and the cooling part of the 60 year ENSO cycle. The climate models were wrong. Russian scientists recommend buying a fur coat.

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 2769593, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/20/2014 2:27:00 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement