Marvel Movie Rights and Why We Can't Have Nice Things

Don't let it get away!

Keep track of the stocks that matter to you.

Help yourself with the Fool's FREE and easy new watchlist service today.

Motley Fool contributor Leo Sun's recent Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. article produced some very interesting replies in the comments section. Many readers questioned why the show has yet to acknowledge the existence of mutants, wondered how Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. missed such an obvious opportunity to introduce the Sub-Mariner, and talked about the future inclusion of a Spider-Woman story line. Unfortunately for Marvel fans, the tangled web that is Marvel's movie rights makes these and other crossover possibilities unlikely.

The Wolverine. Source:

20th Century Fox
20th Century Fox -- now owned by 21st Century Fox (NASDAQ: FOX  ) (NASDAQ: FOXA  ) -- has been one of the most prominent names in superhero movies since 2000's X-Men essentially birthed the modern comic-book movie renaissance.

Today, Fox's X-Men film series comprises six movies that have collectively grossed more than $2.3 billion at the global box office. That is $2.3 billion and counting, as May 2014's X-Men: Days of Future Past and 2016's X-Men: Apocalypse are on the horizon, as well as a sequel to The Wolverine and an untitled X-Force movie, both in the early development stages.

Fox's other Marvel movie franchises have not been able to replicate that same level of success, however. 2003's Daredevil was met with mostly negative reactions from critics and fans; more so for the terrible 2005 Elektra spinoff movie. Today, the Daredevil and all related character rights have reverted back to Marvel Studios.

Fox found slightly more box-office success with Fantastic Four in 2005 and Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer in 2007, although both films received decidedly negative reviews from critics and fans alike. The Fantastic Four movie rights still remain with Fox, which plans to reboot the franchise sometime in 2015.

The Amazing Spider-Man Source:

Columbia Pictures
A division of the Japanese conglomerate Sony  (NYSE: SNE  ) , Columbia Pictures counts its Spider-Man trilogy as one of the most successful movie franchises of all time. The three films have together grossed $2.5 billion at the box office -- $200 million more than the combined six X-Men films. Spider-Man, Spider-Man 2, and Spider-Man 3 are today the 38th, 45th, and 29th highest-grossing films of all time, respectively.

With the completion of director Sam Raimi's trilogy in 2007, Sony and Columbia rebooted the franchise just five short years later as The Amazing Spider-Man. The financial and critical success of this movie resulted in the green-lighting of at least three planned sequels, the first of which will be released in May 2014. The Spider-Man movie rights also include other characters core to the Spider-Man universe, such as The Sinister Six and Venom -- the focus of two untitled spinoff movies currently in development.

Marvel Studios
The bulk of the remaining Marvel movie rights resides with Walt Disney (NYSE: DIS  ) , which acquired the entirety of Marvel Comics in 2009. These rights include Iron Man, Captain America, Thor, Hulk, other Avengers characters such as Ant-Man -- his Marvel Cinematic Universe debut will be in 2015 -- and the ABC Studios television series Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.

Over the years, Disney and Marvel Studios have been slowly reacquiring the movie rights to other Marvel Comics intellectual properties. The previously mentioned Daredevil is an example. Marvel has also reacquired the rights for several other characters: Hulk from Comcast's Universal Studios, The Punisher from a Lions Gate subsidiary, Ghost Rider from Sony, and Blade from Time Warner. It is unlikely that Disney will ever be able to get the rights back to cash cows like X-Men and Spider-Man, however. As long as Fox and Sony release a movie based on those characters every few years, these rights will never revert back to Disney.

Why we can't have nice things
For those comic fans clamoring for an Avengers and X-Men crossover movie or a Defenders film -- a superhero team featuring Hulk, the Silver Surfer, and the Sub-Mariner -- the rights issue will likely make these potential movies a practical impossibility. Negotiating an Avengers and X-Men crossover movie between Disney and Fox would be difficult enough, much less the negotiations needed to produce a film starring Disney's Hulk, Fox's Silver Surfer, and the Sub-Mariner -- the Sub-Mariner movie rights are currently held by Comcast's Universal Studios.

This is unfortunately true of live-action TV as well. While 20th Century Fox's X-Men rights are limited to live-action movies, Marvel cannot produce a live-action TV series based on the X-Men without Fox's consent. This contract provision was the subject of multiple lawsuits involving the 2001-2004 TV series Mutant X; a Marvel TV series about non-X-Men mutants with powers. The lawsuit was settled confidentially in 2003, so we the general public doesn't know the exact settlement terms. Considering that there has yet to be another live-action X-Men or Marvel mutant-related TV show since Mutant X, it is fairly safe to assume that Fox's consent is still required.

Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver. Source:

Foolish bottom line
It can be frustrating for Marvel fans to know that their favorite characters in the comics are walled off in their own separate movie universes. While a recent announcement proclaimed that Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch -- X-Men characters -- will appear in Disney's 2015 Avengers: Age of Ultron sequel, this is likely a uniquely special case given the two characters' close association with The Avengers dating back to the 1960s. I would not expect friendly cooperation between these competing movie studios anytime in the near future. 

Television, as we know it, is on the verge of a transformation. The companies that prevail in this epic disruption could go on to earn their shareholders untold sums of money. And the companies that lose could very well end up in bankruptcy court within a matter of years. With this in mind, our top technology analysts created a groundbreaking free report that sorts out the likely winners from the losers. In doing so, they reveal the handful of companies that are best positioned to make their shareholders exceptionally rich over the next few decades. To download this invaluable free report before the rest of the market catches on, simply click here now.

Read/Post Comments (8) | Recommend This Article (13)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 26, 2013, at 12:48 AM, Minstrel wrote:

    I thoroughly enjoyed "Elektra". I don't know why it's considered a failure. Another overlooked gem was the admirable short-lived TV series "Witchblade", another Marvel property.

  • Report this Comment On December 26, 2013, at 8:53 AM, KingLinus3000 wrote:

    @Minstrel Witchblade is property of Top Cow an imprint of Image Comics.

  • Report this Comment On December 26, 2013, at 9:05 AM, fundinstrongarm wrote:

    I'd like more information on how/why all the various Marvel characters/teams got sold to separate studios to begin with. That's what I thought the article would at least touch on.

  • Report this Comment On December 26, 2013, at 9:40 AM, sniperboy wrote:

    Did Marvel also lease away the term "Mutant"? It sure seems like they avoid saying that work on the Agents of Shield show. What Marvel need to do is go back to their comic line and create a new group of mutants which have no relation to the X-Men. They could basically recreate the X-Men under a different name and with different characters.

  • Report this Comment On December 26, 2013, at 11:06 AM, mrcarlg200 wrote:

    This still doesn't explain why they can't use Spider Woman in The Agents Of Shield TV series. She is her own character and not really part of the Spider-Man universe. Also there are many characters they could use on the show but choose not to. They could introduce T'Challa/Black Panther by having the team escort him on a diplomatic mission, the team could come across some mystical problem and require Dr. Strange's help, they could come up against Moon Knight then team up realizing they have a common enemy, or they could have them work with Frank Castle as a cop before he becomes The Punisher. Disney just needs to losen the reigns a little as far as putting comic book characters in the TV show so they could introduce members of the Marvel universe and see which ones the fans react too. Kind of like what they did in the 90's with The Incredible Hulk TV movies.

  • Report this Comment On December 26, 2013, at 12:08 PM, matthewluke wrote:


    The specifics of the mutant matter are still unknown. The Fox/Marvel Mutant X lawsuit was settled confidentially in 2003, so we do not know exactly what terms the two companies agreed on.


    Unfortunately the existence of Ultimate Spider-Woman (Jessica Drew as Peter Parker's female clone) makes that issue somewhat messy.

    And I do not want to spoil anything comments section (for anybody who cares about that sort of thing), but episode 12 of Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. will have the introduction of someone from the comics. If you are curious, a very quick Google search will tell you that character's name.

  • Report this Comment On December 26, 2013, at 3:42 PM, DDDD987 wrote:

    Couldn't Marvel technically use the best and wolverine as they are both avengers in the comics?

    Additionally, if they made all the x-men, avengers in the comics, couldn't they then be technically used?

    They may not be able to use the term 'mutant' or 'x-men' but my understanding is that they have the full rights to avengers. And if all the x-men just happen to also be avengers? well, it is what it is.


  • Report this Comment On December 26, 2013, at 6:57 PM, PretenderNX01 wrote:

    DDDD987, no I don't think they can just use a character for now being on the Avengers roster.

    My understanding what that Wanda and Pietro were a special case since so much of their career was in the Avengers comics before the movie deals were made so both studios can have a version of Pietro/Quicksilver (Evan Peters will play him in X-Men and Arron Taylor Johnson will play him in Avengers).

    Anything that happens with the X-Men after 20th Fox got the rights doesn't matter as they are established as X-Men when 20th Fox bought the rights.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2770580, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/25/2016 12:16:13 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,261.45 -131.01 -0.71%
S&P 500 2,164.69 -12.49 -0.57%
NASD 5,305.75 -33.78 -0.63%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

9/23/2016 4:03 PM
DIS $93.27 Down -0.14 -0.15%
Walt Disney CAPS Rating: *****
FOX $24.49 Down -0.25 -1.01%
Twenty-First Centu… CAPS Rating: ***
FOXA $23.93 Down -0.37 -1.52%
Twenty-First Centu… CAPS Rating: ***
SNE $33.60 Down -0.31 -0.91%
Sony CAPS Rating: ***