Will America’s New “Green” Navy be Worth the Cost?

How will America's future Navy be fueled? Photo credit: Flickr/Official U.S. Navy Imagery

Earlier this year, the U.S. Navy sailed around Hawaii in a fleet powered with algae and used cooking grease. The "great green fleet" as it has been called is a triumph for the bioenergy industry. The only problem is that it cost the Navy a lot of green in order to go green, with the green fuels costing it a staggering $26 per gallon.

Counting the cost
We already spend billions to fuel the American war machine each year. In fact, the current price tag is upwards of $20 billion per year on fuel. That's with fuel prices that are currently less than $4 per gallon, and heading even lower in 2014 thanks to the current energy boom.

The thing is, this move isn't about saving money today. It's about fueling America's military of the future. A future that likely won't be fueled by cheap shale oil as the production from those wells decline very steeply in each year. What the Navy doesn't want, according to Dennis McGinn who is the Navy's Assistant Secretary for Energy, Installations and the Environment, is to "find ourselves with our backs against the wall in some future crisis where the availability and price of petroleum-based fuels limits all our options." By investing in its future now, the Navy can avoid high costs later. 

For generations our military has thrived on its ability to adapt and remain flexible. That's why it has always been a first mover in not only trying new technologies, but funding the development of next generation tech. Without a doubt, one of our core competitive advantages as a nation has been the fact that we are the first to develop next generation military technologies. That's why it should come as no surprise to see the Navy now cooking up its next generation fuel supply.

Bringing down the price
The problem many point to is that investing in emerging green fuel technologies has been a fool's errand thus far. ExxonMobil Corporation (NYSE: XOM  ) , for example, planned to invest $600 million in a plan to produce economical fuels from algae. That plan, which began in 2009 now has the energy giant starting over after the first $100 million it spent came up empty. ExxonMobil is now turning its attention to helping Synthetic Genomics, which has narrowed its focus from 20,000 strains of algae to just 10 that it believes have the best potential to produce commercially viable oil. That said, ExxonMobil warned that it might be decades before these investments pay off, if ever.

Still, this isn't stopping biofuel producers like Solazyme Inc (NASDAQ: TVIA  ) from tying to meet the Navy's ambitious targets. The company worked with the Navy on the current project that delivered the $26 per gallon fuel. However, Solazyme's goal is to lower its production costs down to $1,000 per metric ton of oil, which is the same bulk price as jet fuel. That said, that project is just one example of what Solazyme currently has cooking.

Beyond that there are a number of other private companies working with the Navy to get its fuel costs down. In fact, the Navy is already going full speed ahead with future biofuel purchases. It has already committed to start purchasing 170 million gallons of biofuel a year as part of its goal to get half its energy from renewable sources by 2020. Not only that but, the current administration is investing more than a half billion dollars to help fund the start-up of several advanced biofuel plants. If these investments are a success, it could go a long way to cutting both the cost of fuel and emissions in the future.

Investor takeaway
These are big and risky bets that the Navy is taking. We've already seen ExxonMobil lose a hundred million dollars as part of its biofuels bet. That's why investors might want to watch this space from the sidelines as there are plenty of other ways to make money in the year ahead. That said, if this project is a success America's military forces will hold a distinct competitive advantage as we'll have our own fuel supply at a time when the fight over the world's dwindling supply of oil could heat up again. 

Get our top stock for 2014
There's a huge difference between a good stock, and a stock that can make you rich. The Motley Fool's chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for 2014, and it's one of those stocks that could make you rich. You can find out which stock it is in the special free report: "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2014." Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 29, 2013, at 9:00 PM, SeacoastPatriot wrote:

    This article is based on old news. The costs per gallon have already come down. The reason that there is so much resistance is because these fuels don't require additional refining, which affects someones bottom line.

    To say that the fuel cost $26 a gallon to make is like saying it cost $100 bucks a can to get a six pack cold because the refrigeration cost $600. Once the plant is actually running, the start up costs can be spread out over time.

    The economies of scale are already working. A concern of mine is that the major oil companies now working with labs are just collecting patents. There have already been patent issues over butanol production, which is a direct replacement for gasoline and jet fuel. Making fuel using a simple process is too frightening for many. When the freezer was invented, all the guys selling ice where probably upset as well.

  • Report this Comment On December 30, 2013, at 11:22 AM, MayaPinion wrote:

    That first sentence... I cannot get the image out of my head that as long as the Golden Arches soar, Ameirca's defense is assured. In future wars, we will not be encouraged to buy war bonds, but to grab a Big Mac.

  • Report this Comment On December 30, 2013, at 2:12 PM, EmFetch267 wrote:

    Another article grabbing loaded numbers not actually representative of the true picture $26 FUEL? So what. It wasn't the price of a commercial quantity nor made to reflect the economies of scale already achievable today. It also neglects the fact that the military already buys fuel more expensive than this.

    Apart from being old news, the fool writing this needs to learn how to do some real research rather than taking numbers off of msnbc articles from 2012. SZYM isnt even a play on biofuels at this point in time. Think oils, not fuel. Learn the difference.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2778424, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/27/2016 6:55:27 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,228.30 133.47 0.74%
S&P 500 2,159.93 13.83 0.64%
NASD 5,305.71 48.22 0.92%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

9/27/2016 4:00 PM
TVIA $2.79 Up +0.05 +1.82%
TerraVia CAPS Rating: ***
XOM $83.24 Up +0.18 +0.22%
ExxonMobil CAPS Rating: ****