Intel’s SoFIA May Be Better Than Expected

One of the biggest disappointments in Intel's (NASDAQ: INTC  ) mobile road map has been the lack of an integrated connectivity/cellular with an applications processor for lower-end smartphones. At Intel's 2012 investor meeting, the company promised an integrated part built on its 22-nanometer FinFET process. The part never materialized. Now, at the 2013 investor meeting, the company announced plans for an integrated low-end part. While it's not quite clear what some may have expected or hoped for, it could end up being much more compelling than initially expected.

SoFIA: initially underwhelming...
At its investor meeting, Intel announced what appears to be a panicked reaction to a need to participate in the low-end/value segments of the smartphone market, and area that Intel believes will comprise roughly 50% of the smartphone market. After all, there's no way that the company can begin to participate in those markets without a highly integrated solution. Remember, these are smartphones that will be selling for roughly $50-$200, so the more that's integrated onto the primary system-on-chip, the better.

The chip family that Intel announced to target this space and that will be used to go head-to-head with Qualcomm, Broadcom, and MediaTek. What seemed initially off-putting about this particular chip was that it is slated to be built at TSMC (NYSE: TSM  ) on its 28-nanometer process. The reason is that Intel's modem/connectivity IP hasn't yet been ported to Intel's own internal processes -- an artifact of the fact that Infineon Wireless, Intel's modem team, had been working on these designs to be built at TSMC before it was acquired. So, without Intel's vaunted process advantage, what advantage could the company possibly have in this space?

It could come down to single-threaded performance
It seems that SoFIA -- both the 3G and the LTE versions -- will sport a port of the company's Silvermont processor core initially designed and optimized for the Intel's 22-nanometer FinFET process. Moving to 28-nanometer planar will lead to a performance reduction, probably manifested in the form of lower clock speeds within the same power envelope barring any major micro-architectural changes. But this isn't all bad. Why?

Well, in the low end of the smartphone market, other players such as Qualcomm, Broadcom, and MediaTek will likely stick to Taiwan Semiconductor's 28-nanometer process simply for reasons of cost -- 20-nanometer and 16 FinFET will be more expensive per transistor, so more suitable for higher-end, higher-ASP products. This means that as far as manufacturing at the low end goes, Intel will be on a par with its peers.

 While Intel's competitors will be pursuing four wimpy cores -- think ARM's Cortex A53 -- Intel will probably fight with two fast Silvermont processor cores. Intel will be at a marketing disadvantage, but in terms of the single-threaded performance that makes up the vast majority of mobile applications -- and potentially multi-threaded performance -- Intel's two higher-performance cores should have a real advantage on a technical front.

The 14-nanometer SoFIA would be a game changer
While Intel stated that its initial SoFIA would be built at TSMC, it plans to move SoFIA to its 14-nanometer process in 2015. This leads to a gross margin improvement; cost per transistor will decline, and it will not have to pay TSMC's foundry margin. It will also lead to dramatic performance and power improvement by virtue of significantly higher-performing transistors.

In short, Intel gains a pretty significant leg up on its competitors. Further, in the lower end of the market, where SoFIA is targeted, Intel's competitors may not be able to afford to move to FinFETs in the late 2015/early 2016 time frame. Intel's 14-nanometer node should have significant performance and density advantages over TSMC's 16-nanometer.

Foolish bottom line
With Intel on the same 28-nanometer playing field at the low end of the smartphone/tablet space as its competitors through most of 2015, it may have an architectural advantage, at least on the CPU side of things. However, by the end of 2015/early 2016, Intel will bring to bear its full manufacturing prowess, even in the low-end, high-volume parts of the smartphone market. While Intel needs to execute, the plan looks incredibly compelling to this long-term investor.

Want another way to get in on the smartphone phenomenon?
Truth be told, one company sits at the crossroads of smartphone technology as we know it. It's not your typical household name, either. In fact, you've probably never even heard of it! But it stands to reap massive profits NO MATTER WHO ultimately wins the smartphone war. To find out what it is, click here to access the "One Stock You Must Buy Before the iPhone-Android War Escalates Any Further..."


Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (0)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 30, 2013, at 2:25 PM, masterwallstreet wrote:

    In my opinion only, and I am entitled to my opinion we might see a reversal. I think 2014 will be a very bad year for Intel. With all of the competition out there and the cutthroat prices Intel will start seeing a reversal. In my opinion only, the stock is overpriced and overvalued. Their products are overpriced and overvalued too. They are not the leading cutting edge anymore. As soon as investors realize this, they will short Intel and long AMD. At least there is a lot of excitement in AMD now. Intel is very boring boring boring.

  • Report this Comment On December 30, 2013, at 2:57 PM, fearandgreed2005 wrote:

    In my opinion, 2014 will be a great year for Intel. The 14nm FinFET will give them both a performance and cost advantage. The stock has a lot of upside and virtually no risk and has a great dividend. Instead of investing in AMD I may just put some money on red at the roulette wheel and try for a quick double. I am very long on Intel.

  • Report this Comment On December 30, 2013, at 6:37 PM, techy46 wrote:

    @mws Intel's products are overpriced and not cutting edge? Well, it's really funny that Intel commands 85% of the cloud and enterprise server markets where prices and value really matter. ARMH, AAPL and QCOM have done a pretty good job with consumer low tech gadgets by the Asus T100 and what they'll announce at CES 2014 are the cutting edge not droid and sheepie toys.

  • Report this Comment On January 02, 2014, at 4:12 AM, mikeor wrote:

    @masterwallstreet Unfortunately you are uneducated on the technical details in Intel's offerings vs. competitors. In short, Intel powers the most powerful and number of supercomputers in the world and nearly every server with Xeon processors, Core is the processor of choice for all premium desktops and laptops (Macbooks/Ultrabooks), Celeron for low-end desktop/laptops, manufactures arguably the fastest/most reliable SSDs, and is now in position to gain significant market share in the mobile market with competitive Atom offerings.

    If you take the time to understand why it leads these markets you will quickly see the value. Also, look up Moore's law and Intel's manufacturing process to see why Intel is, in fact, the most cutting edge. With just last year releases like Quark, Baytrail, Iris graphics, etc. what is "boring"?

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2778201, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/27/2014 5:03:59 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement