Here's Why AT&T's Latest Attempt to Protect Data Caps Won't Fly

AT&T (NYSE: T  ) is hell-bent on keeping its wireless data customers under bandwidth caps. But that attitude destroys some of the most attractive features of your AT&T-connected smartphone or tablet. Why pay extra for a high-speed data plan if you're just running into the data cap after a couple of hours of HD video?

Ma Bell's latest scheme to protect its data cap idea without losing customers to less restrictive networks sounds great with the right spin: "Similar to 1-800 phone numbers or free shipping for Internet commerce, AT&T's new 'Sponsored Data' service opens up new data use options for AT&T wireless customers and customer-friendly mobile broadband channels to businesses that choose to participate as sponsors."

Under the "Sponsored Data" program, the high-bandwidth services you love can foot the bill for your huge downloads or media streams. Like toll calls or free shipping, the costs of making the system work are shifted to the service provider.

But I don't expect data sponsors to flood into this program. Here's why:

  • Press releases of this ilk tend to come with supporting quotes from launch-day partners. This release only talks about AT&T itself, devoid of supporting partner statements. It's fair to say that media streamers aren't exactly chomping at the bit to join this program.

  • AT&T expects customers to sign up for access to this program, rather than just including it by default. In the chicken-and-egg world of building a new service or product, AT&T is unlikely to get enough early adopters to make it worthwhile for data-hogging services to even consider joining up. Remember, gift cards are profitable because so many of them go unused. Microsoft dominated the web browser market for years simply by making Internet Explorer the default browser on new PC systems. Convenience is king, and making your customers do something is often a bad idea.

  • On that note, AT&T won't even list its bandwidth sponsors for you. Instead, each partner must notify AT&T's customers separately when they join the program.

    If Google decides to foot the bandwidth bill for YouTube videos on AT&T's mobile network, you need to look out for an email from YouTube. Then you'll need another confirmation from digital video giant Netflix. That's assuming both of them can afford to cover AT&T's inflated bandwidth rates in the first place, which is hardly guaranteed.

    And if neither of these digital media giants sign up for AT&T's new scheme, you can expect plenty of wireless users to just assume that the largest media services are included -- and then act shocked when their un-subsidized data bills arrive.

Data caps are designed to protect an outdated business model, and it seems unfair to make service providers and/or customers responsible for protecting AT&T's profit margins. Sprint made "unlimited" a selling point many years ago, and the company is still in business.

How many failed reactionary plans will it take before AT&T drops the data cap focus, too? Whatever the answer, AT&T just added another near-certain failure to the list.

None of these tech revolutions will be bloodless...
Interested in the next tech revolution? Then you'll need to learn about the radical technology shift some say forced the mighty Bill Gates into a premature retirement. Meanwhile, early in-the-know investors are already getting filthy rich off of it... by quietly investing in the three companies that control its fortune-making future. You've likely heard of one of them, but you've probably never heard of the other two... to find out what they are, click here to watch this shocking video presentation!


Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 06, 2014, at 4:17 PM, leohaas wrote:

    Indeed, this plan will go nowhere. But to expect that AT&T Wireless will go truly "unlimited" does not make sense. Unlimited only works if there is a natural limit to the amount of resources a single client will use. For instance: all-you-can-eat buffets make a profit because there is only so much a person can eat in one sitting.

    In the connected world, there seems to be no such limit. Your "couple of hours of HD video" example is an excellent one. Just imagine some clients spending most of their waking hours watching HD video without using WiFi. They'll hog all bandwidth on AT&T's network. As a client, I don't want those hogs competing with me for bandwidth! And that is exactly why I'll stay with Verizon...

  • Report this Comment On January 06, 2014, at 6:15 PM, angelwithwings wrote:

    Data caps aren't unreasonable by themselves because there are many abusers of any system. As long as the plan as a whole is "reasonable" for the expected use; then it will survive.

    The Sprint model may fail if it finds acceptance. By allowing "unlimited" data, just a few rogue abusers can spoil the entire experience for a multitude of common users. Networks do have limits.

  • Report this Comment On January 06, 2014, at 10:52 PM, stevenatorr wrote:

    AT&Trash is garbage. I use sprint with no data caps or problems what so ever

  • Report this Comment On January 31, 2014, at 2:01 AM, NewTechnology777 wrote:

    timir@interia.pl Please if possible could you response to my e-mail ?

    message to Anders Bylund

    I have vision of this posts.

    Lot's of news but will never remember author, i think that supposed to be change.

    Respect to all authors writing on this posts with knowledge and sens belive that we supposed to remember authorst on first place.

    Marcin

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2784691, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/21/2014 12:09:38 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement