Why the Risk/Reward Ratio Looks Great for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.

The pharmaceutical sector inevitably serves up companies at different stages in their development.

For instance, take GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE: GSK  ) . It is a well-established pharmaceutical player that has developed a diverse range of drugs and treatments over the years. Although a large proportion of its revenue depends on the success of a relatively small number of drugs, it does enjoy a degree of diversity.

Then there's stable mate Allergan (NYSE: AGN  ) , which focuses on a smaller number of products but attempts to gain approval for those products to be used in a wider range of conditions. For instance, botox is used for facial aesthetics but also for upper limb spasticity, as well as a conditions such as severe underarm sweating. Allergan is seeking approval for further uses, too.

Meanwhile, Regeneron  (NASDAQ: REGN  ) has yet another different set of circumstances, with its first product coming to market in 2008. This makes it a relatively young business, and since then, it has had two further drugs approved by the FDA, one being a partnership with Sanofi.

This means Regeneron could be viewed as risky, since it has a smaller and less diversified stable of products than many of its peers. However, while this could mean greater risk on the one hand, it could also lead to greater reward.

Indeed, Regeneron made a net profit last year for the first time ever, with the company's being able to deliver a bottom line of $750 million in 2012.

Furthermore, 2013 is set to be another profitable year, although earnings are set to dip slightly, by 1%. However, 2014 and 2015 look set to be strong years, with earnings per share forecast to grow by 23% in 2014 and 15% in 2015. This equates to an annualized growth rate of just under 19% in 2014 and 2015: very impressive numbers indeed.

However, the really fascinating thing about Regeneron is not necessarily its products or even its growth in profitability. Rather, it is the potential for how it could perform if the wider market continues to reach higher highs.

This is because Regeneron is a high-beta stock, meaning its shares should outperform the index during a bull run and underperform during a bear phase. For instance, since Regeneron's beta is 1.97, it should (in theory) go up by 1.97% for every 1% gain in the wider market, while the same will (in theory) be true if the wider market falls by 1% -- Regeneron should fall by 1.97%.

Compare this with other pharmaceutical stocks such as GlaxoSmithKline and Allergan, which have betas of 0.54 and 1.15, respectively, and it's clear that Regeneron is a different beast in terms of its risk/reward profile.

This, of course, increases the risk to investors in Regeneron but also means that there are greater potential rewards on offer. Coupled with a growing pipeline of potential drugs, the scope for further FDA approvals, and impressive EPS growth prospects, and, suddenly, the risk/reward ratio for Regeneron looks very appealing.

A new approach to cancer treatement
The best way to play the biotech space is to find companies that shun the status quo and instead discover revolutionary, ground-breaking technologies. In The Motley Fool's brand-new free report "2 Game-Changing Biotechs Revolutionizing the Way We Treat Cancer," find out about a new technology that Big Pharma is endorsing through partnerships, and the two companies that are set to profit from this emerging drug class. Click here to get your copy today.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (0)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 09, 2014, at 3:16 PM, SalsaG wrote:

    The beta is 0.71, according to Motley Fool and Yahoo. Where is the 1.97 number derived from?

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 2788461, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/1/2014 8:40:58 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement