Is Apple Building Its Own Wireless Chips?

The evidence is too difficult to ignore; Apple's staffing up to build its own wireless chips - potentially cutting out Qualcomm and Broadcom longer term.

Jan 14, 2014 at 9:00PM

Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) is the world's largest, most successful consumer electronics company. The company single-handedly revolutionized the cell-phone industry, refined and redefined the "tablet" category, builds (arguably) the world's best PCs, and has one heck of a silicon development team responsible for its "A-series" of chips. The company develops world-class SoCs with leadership IP, much of it custom (and increasingly so).

However, there's one piece of IP that Apple doesn't appear to have today: a cellular modem/baseband. This is a curious omission for a company for whom 52% of sales comes from the sale of cell phones, and an even more curious omission given the strength of the rest of its silicon teams.

How about modems?
What's interesting is that Apple doesn't design its own modems -- in fact, it buys off-the-shelf discrete modems while the rest of the merchant chip industry (as well as the players that build their own chips, such as Samsung) continues to integrate cellular basebands into their mobile system-on-chip products. In short, Apple seems to be the only company that designs apps processors that does not also have modem capability.

Now, given that Apple has demonstrated that it can build world class SoCs and absolutely monstrous CPU cores, it only seems logical that Apple also has internal efforts dedicated to the development of its own modem IP. Why? It's simple: As long as Apple continues to use discrete modems, it will be at a material disadvantage against competitors like Samsung, HTC, and others from both a BoM and a power/board space perspective. It needs to integrate its own modems at some point down the line or risk simply needing to exit the chip-development business for its phones entirely.

Why Apple won't stop designing its own chips
Apple likely has two options: Get some in-house modem action or simply exit the chip business. It is unlikely at Apple intends to exit the chip business considering how aggressively it hires chip designers:



As you can see, Apple has 60 job openings pertaining to CPU design alone -- let alone the rest of the SoC! So, clearly Apple is very committed and focused on developing its own applications processor for a while longer. This suggests to me, then, that Apple has no choice but to do its own modem.

Why is Apple hiring so many RF IC architects?
A look at the job board over at Apple shows that Apple is hiring plenty of RF IC engineers, too:



Apple is apparently hiring folks to build both an RF front end and a RF transceiver. It wouldn't make sense for Apple to do RF front end/transceiver and to not go all of the way to build its own cellular baseband for integration onto the A-series SoCs.

It looks like Qualcomm's (NASDAQ:QCOM) days could be numbered inside of the iPhone and this makes it increasingly unlikely that Intel's wireless division (or Broadcom's, or anybody else's) has any chance of gaining any content share within the iPhone (if Apple does indeed develop and integrate a cellular baseband). Now, before you go ahead and say that Apple "can't" do it, understand the following:

  • Apple has one of the best silicon design teams in the world
  • Apple has a lot of money
  • Every other mobile SoC vendor, even ones far weaker than Apple, have their own cellular baseband and RF effort
  • Apple ships an absolutely enormous number of smartphones, more than justifying the need to stop handing over margins to Qualcomm and others

Apple ships about 150 million iPhones per year with Qualcomm's baseband content estimated at somewhere between $15-$20 per phone-implying a roughly $2.25-$3 billion business that Apple could cease giving to Qualcomm (and could be realized as a significant gross margin savings).

More compelling ideas from The Motley Fool
Opportunities to get wealthy from a single investment don't come around often, but they do exist, and our chief technology officer believes he's found one. In this free report, Jeremy Phillips shares the single company that he believes could transform not only your portfolio, but your entire life. To learn the identity of this stock for free and see why Jeremy is putting more than $100,000 of his own money into it, all you have to do is click here now.

Ashraf Eassa has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Apple. The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple and Qualcomm. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information