PepsiCo Shows Why Frito-Lay and Pepsi Are Better Together

Shareholder Nelson Peltz wants PepsiCo to buy Mondelez International and spin off its beverages unit, but Coca-Cola's envy shows why PepsiCo should stay the way it is.

Jan 15, 2014 at 5:30PM

Pressure is mounting on PepsiCo (NYSE:PEP) and Coca-Cola (NYSE:KO) to find ways to grow amid declining carbonated soft drink sales in the United States. Noted investor Nelson Peltz is pushing PepsiCo to spin off its beverage business and buy Mondelez International (NASDAQ:MDLZ).

The combination of Frito-Lay -- which derives most of its revenue from the United States -- and Mondelez -- which operates internationally -- would create a global snacks powerhouse. However, what is good for Peltz, whose Trian Fund owns stakes in PepsiCo and Mondelez, may not be good for the rest of PepsiCo's shareholders. In fact, even Coca-Cola might prefer to be in PepsiCo's position.

Breaking down the numbers                                                                                                                                                             PepsiCo owns the No. 1 position in salty snacks, hot cereals, and sports drinks and the No. 2 position in juice and carbonated soft drinks. Its overall revenue is split 50/50 between food and beverages.

Operating profit, however, is not so evenly split. Frito-Lay's Americas operations are split into two segments: Frito-Lay North America, or FLNA, and Latin America Foods, or LAF. FLNA and LAF reported a combined $4.8 billion in operating profit during 2012 for a 22% profit margin. PepsiCo Americas Beverages, or PAB, reported $2.9 billion in profit for a 14% operating margin. FLNA, LAF, and PAB represent a combined 74% of overall operating profit, making them the three most important segments in the business.

Pep Profitability

Source: PepsiCo 10-K.

In addition to being more profitable than the other segment, FLNA has been growing faster than PAB; organic FLNA growth was 3.5% in 2012, which compares to 1.5% for PAB. More significantly, FLNA profit increased by 1% in 2012 while PAB profit declined 10%.

If you got lost in all the numbers, the basic idea is this: PepsiCo derives a substantial majority of its profit from North America and the snacks business is in better shape than the beverages business. This is why Peltz believes Mondelez would be a good fit for Frito-Lay and that PepsiCo should spin off its beverages unit.

Mondelez derives only 20% of its sales from North America, with most of the rest coming from faster-growing emerging markets. Its blockbuster brands include Cadbury, Chips Ahoy, Ritz, Oreo, Nabisco, Wheat Thins, and others. Mondelez holds leading market shares in every category and every country in which it competes, which includes the top global market share in biscuits, chocolate, and candy and the No. 2 share in gum and coffee.

Mondelez would provide exposure to higher-growth markets and the spin-off of the beverage unit would unburden PepsiCo from a major drag on profitability. However, that may not make the transformation a good idea.

Coca-Cola would like to own Frito-Lay                                                                                                                                           If it had its druthers, Coca-Cola would probably like to own PepsiCo's Frito-Lay division. Coca-Cola's Americas operations are only slightly less profitable than Frito-Lay's Americas business. The real attraction is not just that Frito-Lay represents a source of growth amid stagnant beverages sales, but that snacks and beverages go so well together . PepsiCo CEO Indra Nooyi defended the beverages unit in an interview on CNBC by noting that when you eat a salty snack, like Fritos, you also reach for a beverage. She said, "These two categories are better together, not just in the United States, but around the world." PepsiCo markets and distributes snacks and beverages together, leveraging its scale and the complimentary aspects of the two.

Coca-Cola, on the other hand, must make due with its beverages business. Although the world's largest soft drink company is expanding its beverages portfolio to include healthier brands like Odwalla, Zico, and Evian, it still relies on sugary beverages for the vast majority of its profits; its top four brands are Coca-Cola, Diet Coke, Fanta, and Sprite. Moreover, it derives 45% of total revenue from North America, where sugary drinks are under attack over health concerns. Although many observers believe that soft drink profits will rebound in 2014 following a return to rational pricing, Coca-Cola would still rather have a close complimentary product to distribute with its soft drinks to leverage its existing infrastructure. So it is understandable why PepsiCo would want to hold onto such a valuable combination.

Bottom line                                                                                                                                                                                             Indra Nooyi is emphatic that she will not spin off PepsiCo's beverage unit and combine Frito-Lay with Mondelez. The latter combination would turn the company into an unmatchable snacks powerhouse, but the beverage-snacks combination is an interesting pairing of complimentary products. Either combination would put the company in a position to build shareholder value for decades, but shareholders should be pleased that Nooyi is sticking with the tried-and-true beverage and snacks business. Why change what's already working?

Is PepsiCo a stock to own forever?
As every savvy investor knows, Warren Buffett didn't make billions by betting on half-baked stocks. He isolated his best few ideas, bet big, and rode them to riches, hardly ever selling. You deserve the same. That's why our CEO, legendary investor Tom Gardner, has permitted us to reveal The Motley Fool's 3 Stocks to Own Forever. These picks are free today! Just click here now to uncover the three companies we love. 

Ted Cooper has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Coca-Cola and PepsiCo. The Motley Fool owns shares of Coca-Cola and PepsiCo. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information