Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



10 Curious Facts About Davos 2014

Davos, Switzerland. Source: Wikimedia Commons.

The annual meeting of the World Economic Forum will be convening in Davos, Switzerland in a few days. JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon, Bono, Maria Bartiromo, and other members of the global elite will be there for several days of high-level forums and highfalutin partying.

The notion of global political leaders and Fortune 500 CEOs descending by helicopter on a Swiss village for fondue and off-the-record conversations might seem a bit sketchy to the average American on Main Street. And a closer look at the some of the details raises a few questions about what these folks will be up to in the coming days. Here are 10 somewhat "curious" facts about Davos 2014.

1. The average cost of attending Davos is $40,000
According to CNN, the average cost of attending Davos is approximately $40,000. For businesses, the cost of an attendee's ticket is around $20,000. But then you have to include travel, food, and lodging. A helicopter from Zurich to Davos goes for about $10,000.

2. One of the big themes of Davos 2014 is "income inequality"
Let me get this straight. Attendees are paying around $40,000, so they can talk about "income inequality"? Will there be a breakout session on irony?

3. Just 15% of Davos members this year will be female
This statistic might mean that women continue to be under-represented in leadership positions in business and government. Or it could mean that women are too sensible to waste precious time and money on several days of bloviating in the snow.

4. The most highly represented stakeholder group is government, followed by banking
Among the 2,500 participants, 288 participants are from government. And 230 are from the "banking and capital markets." Could this sort of chumminess be a reason why no senior Wall Street bankers have been prosecuted for their actions in connection with the financial crisis? Nah, that would be a conspiracy theory.

5. The United States Congress is sending 13 delegates
Looking at the delegate list, I count eight representatives from the House and five senators who will be attending Davos this year. Here's the list:

Representatives from the House
Eric Cantor (R-VA)
Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL)
Kay Granger (R-TX)
Darrell Issa (R-CA)
Patrick McHenry (R-NC)
Carolyn Maloney (D-NY)
Christopher Van Hollen (D-MD)
Jeb Hensarling (R-TX)

Bob Corker (R-TN)
Claire McCaskill (D-MO)
John McCain (R-AZ)
Patrick Leahy (D-VT)
Rob Portman (R-OH)

Do we really need this many members of Congress at the event? I suppose there is the possibility that the bipartisan delegation will bond over glasses of cognac and return to D.C. committed to solving our problems, particularly those relating to income inequality.

6. The theme this year is "The Reshaping of the World: Consequences for Society, Politics and Business"
Professor Klaus Schwab, who is the executive chairman of the Forum, writes:

The theme of the meeting The Reshaping of the World: The Consequences for Society, Politics and Business speaks to the need for leaders to fundamentally reassess how the tectonic plates of the world are shifting against each other, so they can predict and respond more effectively to the earthquakes that we know are coming.

Sounds like a forum written by and for Thomas Friedman. And, yes, he'll be there -- as if there were any doubt.

7. "Strategic Partners" pay more than $500,000 for setting the "intellectual agenda of Forum meetings"
According to the World Economic Forum website, its Strategic Partners are a select group of 100 leading global companies that "benefit from and contribute to the global knowledge base through working closely with the Forum to set the intellectual agenda of Forum meetings, driving the insight agenda of its publications and steering the impact of its initiatives."

Unsurprisingly, Wall Street is well-represented among the Strategic Partner firms that pay more than $500,000 for the privilege. Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, Citigroup, and Morgan Stanley are all part of this special group.

8. Maria Bartiromo is attending Davos 2014 as a private citizen
Financial television fans (and who among us isn't a fan?) will be happy to learn that Maria Bartiromo will be in Davos, even though a noncompete clause will keep her off the air until Jan. 31. She's attending this year as a "private citizen" and will host a few seminars. Rumor has it that one of the seminars is about JPMorgan and the Bernie Madoff case. I haven't been able to confirm that, however.

9. The most exclusive event badge entitles you to the "Informal Gathering of World Economic Leaders"
White badges are for ordinary delegates, who are most likely wealthy by ordinary standards but are considered proletarians in the Forum pecking order. The most exclusive badge, according to CNN, has a holographic image on it. That will get you into the "Informal Gathering of World Economic Leaders." According to Felix Salmon, NAFTA emerged from one of these exclusive sessions -- for better or worse.

10. If you are a "Global Shaper" under the age of 30, you will require an invitation to the annual meeting
What does a "Global Shaper" do? Are "Global Shapers" above the age of 30 allowed to just pop in uninvited to the proceedings? Your guess is as good as mine.

The failure of global elites
Just last week, the Financial Times' Martin Wolf wrote about the failures of our global elites in recent years. He notes that these failures, particularly in the financial realm, are "big enough to cause doubts about our elites." Our global leaders need to do better, according to Wolf, or else "rage may overwhelm us all." That might be something for them to consider in Davos later this week.


Read/Post Comments (6) | Recommend This Article (11)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 21, 2014, at 7:04 PM, mikecart1 wrote:

    #2 is the funniest by far.

  • Report this Comment On January 22, 2014, at 12:17 AM, madmaven wrote:

    I was going to attend but somehow couldnt justify the costs of the trip. Oh well, I will just have to be happy living here in paradise and going fishing.

  • Report this Comment On January 22, 2014, at 1:28 AM, dorkmeyer wrote:

    Very puckishly put, Mr. Reeves; the ever-so-slightly-satiric tone of your piece is pitch perfect.

    To me, just as curious as the inordinate number of U.S. Congress members who'll be attending the Forum is their party affiliation: ~70% of those 13 people who each will incur $40,000 of taxpayer-funded expenses are from the deficit-slashing/"sequestration" party (most notably---or "curiously"---Tea Party apologist Eric Cantor).

    I certainly appreciate the irony that you noted; however, the ultimate irony for me would be if, after Herr Doktor Professor Schwab, Tom Friedman, and all the other Davos folks had fully resolved all potential problems related to the shifting of their metaphorical tectonic plates, a hiccup by the Yellowstone Caldera or by an Icelandic stratovolcano wreaked infinitely more---and infinitely less tractable---global havoc (and thereby also ultimately addressed that income inequality that the Davos group had also presumably discussed).

  • Report this Comment On January 24, 2014, at 4:47 PM, SamLan wrote:

    Since they don't understand their roles as part of the problem, it is more than highly unlikely that they will come forward as part of the solution. At the same time, it is worth remembering that as populations feel increasingly marginalized their anger will grow.

    If history is any guide here, crowd sourced anger is NOT a good basis for policy. )-;

  • Report this Comment On January 25, 2014, at 3:32 PM, richak28 wrote:

    Let me see now, the price to get the ticker sym' for this stock is about 4 digits ? How much will it cost for the next one ???

  • Report this Comment On January 25, 2014, at 11:41 PM, whyaduck1128 wrote:

    The globe has a shape. It's a GLOBE. It does not need shaping, as far as I can tell.

    As for the forum itself, I won't be convinced that it's all aboveboard until the "Strategic Partners" who "set the intellectual agenda" come to the conclusion that THEY are the biggest part of the problem. I'm not holding my breath waiting for it.

    Finally, it's a good thing that this forum takes place in a beautiful, neutral country with a good security system like Switzerland. Otherwise, someone would conclude that it would be worthwhile to try to set off just one little nuke, if there's a 10% chance of getting rid of Dimon and similar big bank filth, not to mention Bartiromo, Leahy, Issa, Thomas Friedman, Professor Schwab, and a lot of other economic parasites.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2799711, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/28/2015 3:45:05 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

John Reeves

Editor, Writer, Investor, and Fool.

Today's Market

updated 6 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 16,654.77 369.26 2.27%
S&P 500 1,987.66 47.15 2.43%
NASD 4,812.71 115.17 2.45%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes