The Courts Rule Against Tobacco Again, How Much Will It Hurt This Time?

At the end of last week, the United States' largest domestic tobacco companies, Altria (NYSE: MO  ) , Reynolds American (NYSE: RAI  ) , and Lorillard (NYSE: LO  ) , reached an agreement with the Department of Justice over allegations that the companies had lied about the dangers of smoking to their customers and the American public.

The final agreement is still to be approved by the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. and concludes several years of talks that followed the ruling by U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler back in 2006, which inferred that the nation's largest cigarette makers concealed the dangers of smoking for decades.

What's the punishment?
So, there are basically two factors that are likely to impact Altria, Reynolds, and Lorillard as a result of this ruling. Firstly, their marketing costs will rise.

Under the ruling, Altria, Reynolds, and Lorillard must publish ads in the Sunday editions of 35 newspapers and on newspaper websites, as well as buy prime-time advertising space on CBS, ABC, or NBC five times per week for a year -- not a cheap undertaking. In addition, all three companies concerned must publish 'corrective' statements on their websites and affix them to a certain number of cigarette packs, three times per year, for two years. Again, none of this is likely to be cheap.

Can we estimate how much it will cost? Not really, although according to data from 2011 the average cost of a prime time TV spot is around $110,000. An ad for one prime time sport, five times a week for a year then will cost around just shy of $29 million per annum. In comparison, Lorillard spent $30 million to advertise its Blu e-cig product last year. So, financially, this judgement is not likely to damage the income of big tobacco significantly.

Humiliation
Nonetheless, the advertisements, or corrective statements as they have been referred to, are damning and they have been described as:

"...shameful and humiliating..."

The statements are designed to make up for years of misleading information that these companies have given. Under the agreement, every statement should be prefaced by a statement that conveys to readers the fact that:

"...a federal court has concluded that the defendant deliberately deceived the American public..."

This statement must then be followed by one of a list of corrective statements approved by the court, including but not limited to:

"Philip Morris USA, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco, Lorillard, and Altria intentionally designed cigarettes to make them more addictive."

"There is no safe level of exposure to secondhand smoke."

"When you smoke, the nicotine actually changes the brain — that's why quitting is so hard."

Impact on sales
These negative statements lead me to conclude that the ruling will have an effect on sales. Effectively, these tobacco companies are paying to tell consumers to stop using their products. Fortunately, it is possible to estimate what effect this will have on sales.

Specifically, a study entitled Can anti-smoking television advertising affect smoking behaviour? Controlled trial of the Health Education Authority for England's anti-smoking TV campaign, designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Health Education Authority for England's anti-smoking television advertising campaign, concluded that an 18-month anti-smoking campaign would reduce smoking prevalence by around 1.2%.

In summary
So, it remains to be seen just how much this ruling will impact tobacco companies. Marketing costs incurred by this ruling are not really likely to impact the profits of Altria significantly, although Reynolds and Lorillard might be more effected.

Indeed, an additional $100 million a year in advertising spending (this is a complete guess but based on the $30 million per year in TV advertising covered above, it seems appropriate) will impact Altria's net profit by 2%, based on 2012 numbers. The impacts on Reynolds and Lorillard are likely to be slightly more damaging, but not catastrophic.

Nevertheless, the most pressing issue here is the impact that these advertisements will have on sales. Although the study from Britain suggests that the impact could be minimal, it's hard to tell how things will work out.

Other long-term opportunities
As every savvy investor knows, Warren Buffett didn't make billions by betting on half-baked stocks. He isolated his best few ideas, bet big, and rode them to riches, hardly ever selling. You deserve the same. That's why our CEO, legendary investor Tom Gardner, has permitted us to reveal The Motley Fool's 3 Stocks to Own Forever. These picks are free today! Just click here now to uncover the three companies we love. 


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (0)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 20, 2014, at 11:34 AM, EquityBull wrote:

    Here is an opposite take to think about. Remember the saying "all press is good press"? Well what if all this opportunity to put tobacco and cigarettes front and center on tv actually proves that true. Good press and bad press is good press. What if we actually see sales go up as a result of the "marketing/press" blitz? Crazier things have happened. Ultimately it will have people looking at cigarettes more.

    In the end the issue is that the companies didn't say the products would hurt you or get you addicted. Well people have known for many years now that cigarettes are addictive and not good for you. They also know that overeating (50% of US population is obese), alcohol in excess, drug use, texting and driving are all unhealthy or deadly. Yet despite our knowledge we still indulge in these things.

    Will these ads really matter or will they be a trojan horse and boost tobacco sales? We'll see....

  • Report this Comment On January 23, 2014, at 8:17 AM, petpirhana wrote:

    I think the recent article by Miryanville should be the big for tobacco companies. E-cigarettes are out there. "Grass" hass been approved and licenced in states with government approval. It doesn't takes a giant leap to figure out what MAY happen. Read the article.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2792865, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/30/2014 8:35:00 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Apple's next smart device (warning, it may shock you

Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early-in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!


Advertisement