Is Jos. A Bank's Rejection of the Buyout Offer from Men's Wearhouse a Godsend?

A look at how Men's Wearhouse might be saved in the long-run because of Jos. A Bank rejecting its buyout offer.

Jan 21, 2014 at 3:10PM

Last Friday, Jos. A Bank Clothiers (NASDAQ:JOSB) announced that it was formally rejecting a buyout offer from Men's Wearhouse (NYSE:MW). For months, Jos. A Bank and Men's Wearhouse have engaged in back-and-forth discussions in attempts to acquire each other. However, with this recent rejection by Jos. A Bank, some investors might ask if the bidding war will continue or finally die out. Perhaps more important is whether or not Jos. A Bank is really worth taking over to begin with.

"I want it!" he said. "No! I do!!!" she replied
Last October, Jos. A Bank announced its willingness to acquire Men's Wearhouse for $48 per share. At that price, Jos. A. Bank valued Men's Wearhouse at $2.3 billion, 36.7% more than the company's valuation a day earlier. In response, Men's Wearhouse claimed that its competitor was trying to buy it out on the cheap.

A month later, Men's Wearhouse bid $55 per share (or $1.5 billion) for Jos. A Bank, a price that the smaller rival considered inadequate. This was followed up in early January with a higher offer of $57.50 per share which valued Jos. A Bank at $1.61 billion.

Just prior to the most recent announcement by Men's Wearhouse, Jos. A Bank amended its 2007 shareholder rights plan (aka poison pill) to make it more difficult for an outside party to acquire a significant stake in the company. In the event that any party acquires a 10% or greater stake in the company, all Jos. A Bank shareholders (with the exception of the entity who surpassed the 10% limit) will be issued more shares. This would effectively dilute the stake of the acquiring party and the acquirer would need more cash to buy enough shares to gain seats on the company's board of directors.

Why all the trouble?
By this point, some investors are probably asking why Jos. A Bank and Men's Wearhouse want one another so bad. This is especially true when you consider that Jos. A Bank's stock has risen 35.6% and Men's Wearhouse has jumped 43.7% since the news broke about the first potential deal in October.

Is it possible that both companies are no longer operating with a sense of what's best for their shareholders but, instead, denying any deal on the basis of pride? You see, there must be a price at which a deal no longer makes sense because of valuation. However, what is that price? To answer this, investors need only look at the value created by both companies in recent years.

Over the past five fiscal years, Men's Wearhouse has grown its revenue at a decent clip of 26.2% from $1.97 billion to $2.49 billion. While this may appear enviable, it falls far short of the 50.8% growth experienced by Jos. A Bank, which saw its sales go from $695.9 million to $1.05 billion. From this data alone, it looks like Jos. A Bank is a highly desirable investment, but there's a catch: in order to grow twice as fast as Men's Wearhouse, the company had to take a hit to its bottom line.

Over this time-frame, Jos. A Bank saw its net income rise only 36.5% from $58.4 million to $79.7 million. Meanwhile, Men's Wearhouse enjoyed a hefty 124% growth rate as net income rose from $58.8 million to $131.7 million. What this disparity between revenue growth and net income growth for each party means is that the companies have focused on different strategies.

Men's Wearhouse, for instance, believes in growing its business at a reasonable rate while placing emphasis on maintaining attractive margins. Jos. A Bank, on the other hand, is partial to the idea of playing catch-up with its larger peer by forgoing profits now in exchange for more market share and potentially higher profits in the future.

Foolish takeaway
Moving forward, it will be interesting to see what avenue these two companies take. For now, Men's Wearhouse seems to think that Jos. A Bank has a lot of value behind its name, but I'm not so sure. In the recent past, Jos. A Bank's growth has been explosive, but the company's poor profitability overshadows its ability to grow. In the event that Men's Wearhouse pays too much for an acquisition, the last laugh may belong to Jos. A Bank's management who sold a less-than-stellar operation that Men's Wearhouse could easily mimic by cutting prices. 

Buy and forget these three stocks
Right now, Men's Wearhouse and Jos. A Bank are still at odds over a potential buyout.  While this could earn you a nice return now, every investor should position him/herself for the future.  What better way than with the same strategy used by Warren Buffett?  As every savvy investor knows, Warren Buffett didn't make billions by betting on half-baked stocks. He isolated his best few ideas, bet big, and rode them to riches, hardly ever selling. You deserve the same. That's why our CEO, legendary investor Tom Gardner, has permitted us to reveal The Motley Fool's 3 Stocks to Own Forever. These picks are free today! Just click here now to uncover the three companies we love. 

Daniel Jones has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information

Compare Brokers