Can Russia Afford to Host the Winter OIympics?

The "Olympic Effect" and the Russian economy.

Jan 28, 2014 at 1:04PM


Recent financial reports have brought to light the lackluster financial state of the Russian economy this past year. With a 2013 growth rate at an anemic 1.3% and fixed investments falling almost a full percentage point over this past year, the prospects for the Russian economy seem somewhat bleak.

Then again, there is research expecting the upcoming Sochi 2014 Winter Olympics to revitalize the ailing economy and double 2013's growth rate. This "Olympic Effect" has been shown in several studies to indicate a measure of market liberalization as well as a marked increase in foreign trade and investment in the host country. The increase and permanence in trade and wealth generation are not guaranteed, a fact that has been shown to be the case in Athens after the 2004 Olympics. While the buildup to the Olympics did bring an Athens that was "cleaner, brighter, easier to get around, vibrant, and modern," 95% of stadiums and venues constructed for the Games are closed or in various states of disrepair. At the start of the Beijing Games four years later, Greece was spending three quarters of a billion to maintain these degrading facilities. 

The London Games would seem to be another example of the "Olympic Effect" in action. Generating an estimated 9.9 billion pounds after hosting the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games, it would seem the British have successfully modeled the idea. Ignoring the fact that the Games cost an estimated 8.9 billion pounds to host, nearly every government project enacted in the wake of the event has fallen short of stated goals. Sometimes this failure to meet expectations has been due to budget shortfalls, other times this has come due to a lack of long-term achievable benchmarks. 

Sochi 2014

With similar long-term responses coming in the wake of the Beijing and Sydney Games, the astronomical amount of funds invested by Putin's Russia may be money the country does not have. Considering the dual stresses of lackluster growth as well as ever-growing economic strains on the Russian economy, are the benefits worth the costs? 

From an absolute numbers standpoint, this Olympic Games is expected to cost in excess of $50 billion, representing a 500% increase over initial budgets. With half this amount of money coming from the central government, there have already been allegations of graft and kickbacks to members of Putin's inner circle. One childhood friend was awarded a $7 billion contract worth more than the entire budget of the 2010 Vancouver Games. Another confidante has won the most expensive deal in developing all transportation infrastructure between the resort town and the mountains. 

One could initially claim success as a massive wave of income into the country means a revivified Russia. Unfortunately, with $30 billion of the bottom line being footed by state-run enterprises and agencies, the money expended is really just coming out of Russian coffers. Like Athens and other Games before it, many Sochi facilities are expected to prove commercially useless both before and after the Games.

This expense may not be quite so bad if Russia had recently come into fresh revenue streams, but this is not the case. The immediate incentives given to the Ukraine from the EU as well as long-term costs of the deal hamper Russia further. The recent security concerns due to various militant attacks represent an additional vector of expenditure that concerns the state. Already over 40,000 security officers are expected to be on-site during the games. This number is three times the number of officers employed for the London Games and fails to include the tens of thousands of army personnel deploying to the area in response to the aforementioned attacks. This security expense cannot go underrepresented in the total cost of the Games. 

With a Games costing more than three times Russia's education budget and twice the health budget, Russia seems primed to follow recent Olympics in creating the next great money pit. Considering the state of the Russian economy at the present as well as the state's ongoing security concerns, are the Games really where Russia's focus needs to be? Of course not, but as many point out, too much has happened to stop now. All that Putin may be left with is the hope that the Olympics can be a sign of market liberalization and recoup his state's investment in the long term.

The next step

Want to figure out how to profit on business analysis like this? The key is to learn how to turn business insights into portfolio gold by taking your first steps as an investor. Those who wait on the sidelines are missing out on huge gains and putting their financial futures in jeopardy. In our brand-new special report, "Your Essential Guide to Start Investing Today," The Motley Fool's personal-finance experts show you what you need to get started, and even gives you access to some stocks to buy first. Click here to get your copy today -- it's absolutely free.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information

Compare Brokers