The Method Behind Google, Inc.'s Motorola Madness

All those who lamented Google's (NASDAQ: GOOGL  ) decision in 2012 to drop $12.4 billion on Motorola Mobility, easily its largest acquisition to date, as misguided and much too expensive are probably gloating today. After announcing it sold Motorola, not counting the 20,000 mobile patents, to Lenovo (NASDAQOTH: LNVGY  ) for $2.9 billion, Google and CEO Larry Page were likely expecting a tidal wave of negativity. And, at first glance, the various headlines referring to the Lenovo deal as "Google's Misstep" seem warranted.

But before you judge the deal too quickly -- in other words, take the original $12.4 billion price tag Google spent for Motorola in 2012, subtract the $2.9 billion it just sold the unit for, and determine Google is eating $9.5 billion -- there's a bit more to the story. Does the sale of Motorola equate to an admission of defeat for Google? To some extent, yes, certainly as a hardware manufacturer, but nothing close to a $9.5 billion setback.

The rest of the story
Determining how big a hit Google is taking by selling Motorola to Lenovo requires reviewing its original deal to secure the business in 2012. Of the $12.4 billion Google spent to acquire the device manufacturer, $2.9 billion was cash and equivalents sitting on Motorola's balance sheet. That drops the cost of Motorola's actual assets at the time to $9.5 billion.

Since taking over Motorola, Google has also unloaded non-core assets, including last year's deal to sell the cable box unit to Arris Group for $2.05 billion in cash along with $300 million in stock. So, if we take another $2.3 billion from the $9.5 billion Google sunk into Motorola's assets, the search giant's on the hook for about $7.2 billion.

When Google made the original Motorola deal, it estimated the value of Motorola's patent portfolio at a whopping $5.5 billion. Even then, it was clear the patents were far and away the most valuable asset Motorola owned. Some investors may question Google's patent valuation, but let's assume its patent estimates are close; that leaves Google with Motorola assets of $1.7 billion ($7.2 billion less $5.5 billion), based on its original acquisition price. Does that mean Google actually made money on the Lenovo deal? Not quite.

There's one last factor to consider in calculating just how much Google lost, or gained, from the sale of Motorola. The $2.9 billion deal with Lenovo for the hardware business includes $1.4 billion in cash, about half the amount Google received in its original Motorola transaction, meaning Lenovo is actually spending $1.5 billion for Motorola's hardware assets.

After taking into account the cash included in both the 2012 and 2014 Motorola deals, asset sales in the interim, and Google's patent portfolio, the sale of Motorola leaves Google with approximately $200 million of egg on its face ($1.7 billion less $1.5 billion). Nothing to brag about, but hardly as bad as the headlines would have some believe. 

From here
Though China-based Lenovo's $2.3 billion deal to acquire the low-end server business of IBM last week was well received, the same can't be said for the Motorola acquisition. Lenovo was down more than 4% at the open after getting pounded by investors in after-hours trading.

As for Google, the decision to exit the hardware business and concentrate on its Android OS dominance, self-driving cars, and bizarre Internet balloons, among other innovative technologies, seems to have struck a chord with investors, and Google's share price jumped about 2% out of the gate this morning.

Final Foolish thoughts
The Motorola announcement is an ideal example of why investors need to go beyond the headlines before making decisions. If your research stopped at the news that Google spent $12.4 billion for Motorola and then sold it less than two years later for $2.9 billion, you'd wonder if Page and his team had lost their collective minds. Turns out, what seemed to have been a colossal failure at first glance really wasn't that bad a deal for Google.

A hidden mobile gem
Want to get in on the smartphone phenomenon? There's one company sitting at the crossroads of smartphone technology as we know it, and t's not your typical household name, either. But it stands to reap massive profits NO MATTER WHO ultimately wins the smartphone war. To find out what it is, click here to access the "One Stock You Must Buy Before the iPhone-Android War Escalates Any Further..."


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (3)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 30, 2014, at 11:05 PM, alexcai wrote:

    Another great move for Lenovo. Through this deal, Lenovo gained

    (1) instant access to US and European market

    (2) Motorola technical know-how and a vast patent pool via a licensing deal with Google

    (3) a well-known brand name, marketing knowledge and sales channels in western countries .

    (4) elimination of one competitor.

    For Google, it is also a great deal:

    (1) got rid of the low-margin, "low-tech" business it didn't want in the Motorola Mobile acquisition and lowered the actual cost of Motorola's vast mobile patent portfolio.

    (2) regained/maintained Google's neutral stance in the Android Ecosystem.

    (3) fostered another strong contender in the mobile Android world against Samsung. Lenovo is protected by the Motorola patent pool in the future wars against Apple and Samsung. Samsung's dominance worries Google day and night.

    (4) weakened Samsung's negotiation power with Google.

    Truly a win-win deal! The biggest losers are Apple and Samsung, imo.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2816984, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/31/2014 3:09:03 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement