De Blasio's Frack Attack Fuels Gas Argument

New York City's new mayor, Bill De Blasio, is against fracking as evidenced by his recent remarks at the U.S. Conference of Mayors, which included statements like, "The one thing I am firm about is that I don't see any place for fracking" and "my view is that there should be a moratorium on fracking in New York State until the day comes that we can actually prove it's safe, and I don't think that day is coming any time soon." De Blasio questions the reliability of science and technology and is also concerned there is just too much danger to the state's water supply to allow tracking to move forward. So the question looms, if New York does not move fast enough to produce enough renewable energy in its own backyard and needs additional funding for post-Sandy resilience, does that force Governor Cuomo's hand to open up fracking to the Southern region of New York State when the fracking moratorium expires in May 2015? If that question does lead to a lifting of the moratorium, whether you are for or against fracking, the investment window of opportunity could open for companies that are focused on making fracking cleaner, if that's really possible. 

Overall, the energy industry is actively moving to reduce, reuse, and recycle water. This has me interested in Nuverra Environmental Solutions (NYSE: NES  ) , a company working on a pilot program with Halliburton (NYSE: HAL  ) in the Bakken region to recycle wastewater right on site. However, if we had to advance fracking (and I did say "if"), wouldn't it make sense to do so "without" using water at all?

One company that is actively using a waterless liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) gel fracturing technology is GASFRAC Energy Services. Considering injecting water into oil and gas wells to stimulate fossil fuel recovery has caused major concerns from environmentalists, (ex.contaminated flowback water and increased seismic activity in regions where fracking is active), the idea of waterless fracking technology is appealing since it may not disturb the geological formation. If that really is true that should bode well for GASFRAC as it looks to expand its presence in North America. This idea would become even more popular if propane, the primary petroleum used in GASFRAC's gel, can be transported more cheaply and shown to be very effective at deeper depths of formation "without" any environmental concerns.

GASFRAC's LPG gel, which was named one of Time Magazine's 25 Best Inventions for 2013, can be customized for different formations and even offered in a Hybrid LPG system. Ultimately my enthusiasm for LPG gel really comes down to the fact it increases initial production rates, and it helps establish production much sooner than traditional fracturing methods. Therefore those patents can be very valuable since GASFRAC holds a dominant position in LPG fracturing and could even license its technology to third parties. Throw in the fact that the company's LPG gel reduces time on location, reduces net cost since customized fluids allow frac fluid recovery, and E&P companies who are looking for savings wherever possible may be more willing than ever to partner with GASFRAC. Additionally, LPG may be better for the environment since water is not wasted (80% of water used in conventional fracking stays in the well). 

GASFRAC's LPG can also be reused, so it reduces truck traffic and a project's overall carbon footprint. This may be why other companies such as Shell, Apache (NYSE: APA  ) , Chevron (NYSE: CVX  ) and others have become early adopter clients. This may also present a good opportunity for GASFRAC management to possibly explore a strong pitch to New York's Cuomo and De Blasio to determine if waterless technology can at all influence the fracking conversation in the state ahead of what is certainly a major decision with national implications, especially since Cuomo may be a candidate for the Oval Office in the next Presidential Election.

Like it or not, fracking is revolutionizing American energy
Record oil and natural gas production is revolutionizing the United States' energy position. Finding the right plays while historic amounts of capital expenditures are flooding the industry will pad your investment nest egg. For this reason, the Motley Fool is offering a comprehensive look at three energy companies set to soar during this transformation in the energy industry. To find out which three companies are spreading their wings, check out the special free report, "3 Stocks for the American Energy Bonanza." Don't miss out on this timely opportunity; click here to access your report -- it's absolutely free. 


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 02, 2014, at 12:52 AM, mike1988 wrote:

    Interesting how De Blasio questions the reliability of science and technology relative to fracking yet accepts without question the reliability of science and technology when it comes to human caused global warming. Like most liberals, they pick and chose their stands.

  • Report this Comment On February 02, 2014, at 10:35 AM, snowhawke wrote:

    No wonder NYC desires to smother natural gas exploration......the NYC water supply desires to buy approximately 150 square miles of the catskills and anything that would enhance the real estate market and encourage overtaxed landowners to hold on is to be discouraged. See the attached reference report from epa.

    http://www.epa.gov/esd/land-sci/ny.htm#purpose

    NYC/downstate has nothing in common with upstate.

  • Report this Comment On February 07, 2014, at 3:14 PM, curiouswe wrote:

    Some things to consider:

    If one can believe the government, fracking does not cause earthquakes. The disposing of water down waste wells causes some minor quakes.

    I do not know if it matters, but fracking pressures would be temporary and disposal well pressures could be long term (I am a Geologist but not oil savvy).

    Water fracking is less expensive than gelled gas fracking. Customized fluids allowing frac fluid recovery DOES lower costs, but it is still more expensive than using water.

    LPG gel fracking not only speeds up initial production (I have not read this to be true but it could be semantics), but it can also lengthen the production life of a well (this depends on the well's Geology) (water fracking's retained fluid in a well blocks some of the fractures created and lessens the total output of a well). Waterless fracking helps establish production much sooner if you are considering the water that needs to be pumped out.

    Fracking, whether watered or waterless, IS ALL ABOUT disturbing the geological formation.

    How does LPG gel reduce time on location?

    Unless one is talking about a multi-well pad I do not see that LPG gel reduces truck traffic (a multi-well pad could also reduce water fracking truck traffic).

    Waterless fracking looks like the way to go for the future. Even if we had an unlimited supply of water, the use of chemicals should be enough to give pause to politicians.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2819242, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/28/2014 11:28:36 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement