Dow Panic? Why a Down January Means Nothing to Stocks

Although we don't believe in timing the market or panicking over daily movements, we do like to keep an eye on market changes -- just in case they're material to our investing thesis.

The Dow Jones Industrials (DJINDICES: ^DJI  ) finished January with a loss of 878 points, qualifying as a minor correction with its 5.3% decline. That loss has many investors nervous, given what they see as a negative track record for the stock market in years when returns in the first month of the year aren't promising. But when you take a closer look at the actual performance of the Dow recently, you'll find that a down January guarantees nothing about the future course of the stock market.

The worst case
Of course, there are plenty of situations in which a poor year has followed a down January. The most obvious example is 2008, in which the Dow kept dropping from its late-2007 record highs and fell 615 points in January, almost a 5% move. That proved to be the beginning of what would culminate in the financial crisis, with the Dow ending the year down 34%.

Less dramatic examples include 2005, when the Dow declined about 2.7% in January. The average actually regained some of that lost ground during the remainder of the year but still ended 2005 with a slight loss overall. Subpar performance in 2000 and 2002 also support the down January theory.

Plenty of counterexamples
At the same time, though, there have been many instances in which a loss in January didn't result in a terrible year for the market. In fact, in recent years, that has almost become the rule rather than the exception.

In 2010, the Dow fell by 3.5% in January, leading many to believe that the more than 50% jump from the Dow's 2009 lows had run its course. Yet the Dow only fell another 200 points or so before hitting bottom and regaining altitude. By the end of the year, the Dow had climbed almost 1,150 points for the year, and we all know how well the stock market did during the ensuing three years compared to its closing level of 11,577 at the end of 2010.

Similarly, in 2009, the Dow plunged almost 9% in January, defying hopes that the average had already hit bottom during the terrifying fall of 2008. Even after a 775-point decline, the Dow would go on to fall more than 1,500 points further before hitting bottom. By the end of 2009, the stock market had not only recovered all of its losses but picked up an impressive 1,650 points -- about a 19% return not including dividends.

In addition, even in years when the overall Dow obeys the down January rule, individual stocks can often move in the other direction. In 2008, Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT  ) defied the Dow both in January and throughout the year, with the retail giant using its recession-resistant reputation to post huge 20% gains even in a terrible year for stocks. McDonald's (NYSE: MCD  ) went further, falling in January 2008 but ending the year up almost 10%. Both stocks succeeded by catering to the value-conscious attitude that consumers had during the worst of economic times.

Don't pay attention to the noise
The thing about statistically suggested indicators like the down January theory is that they never hold true 100% of the time and are misleading in their implication that there's any causal relationship that makes the indicators determinative. In this case, January performance and negative overall annual returns don't have a strong enough link that investors can rely on the indicator's track record. As a result, taking action based on it is just another example of market timing. That's not a trap that any long-term investor wants to fall into in their investment strategy.

Don't let yourself get tricked out of the market
Market drops are hard to ride through, but your best strategy is to isolate your best few ideas, bet big, and ride them to riches, hardly ever selling. That's why our CEO, legendary investor Tom Gardner, has permitted us to reveal The Motley Fool's 3 Stocks to Own Forever. These picks are free today! Just click here now to uncover the three companies we love. 


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (5)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 01, 2014, at 11:23 AM, stillwater9999 wrote:

    By valuations are much worse now than in 2010. 2013 saw far too many high flyer/high multiple stocks, hot IPOs and story stocks (many without adequate supporting financials). There was a high degree of froth in the market for the first time since the 2008-2009 crash. There is still too much even now on 2/1/14 for my taste.

  • Report this Comment On February 01, 2014, at 12:41 PM, rbbr79 wrote:

    Flippers like to focus their spending on high-visibility items like granite countertops, stainless steel appliances and decorative garage doors, which look expensive but in the grand scheme are a very cheap way to divert a buyer's attention from things that may have been done cheaply or neglected altogether, i.e. used or resurfaced kitchen cabinets, flooring, plumbing, HVAC and structural and exterior items (siding, roofing).

  • Report this Comment On February 01, 2014, at 10:57 PM, therealfool wrote:

    This article while encouraging is not "good enough". I would have expected more statistical evidence of the argument then a bunch of examples and counter examples. A lot has been written on this "January Barometer", many of those articles provide more evidence for their argument whether it is against or for believing in this "barometer".

    I am a recent fool that hopes to become more foolish without being fooled by an opinion!

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2820035, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/21/2014 11:47:57 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement