Controversial Casting for 'Batman vs. Superman' Continues

Warner Bros. has announced additional members of the "Batman vs. Superman" cast, and not everyone is happy with the choices. The new castings aren't as divisive as Ben Affleck or Gal Gadot were, however, and may shine a ray of hope on the production.

Feb 2, 2014 at 7:39AM

The sequel to last year's Man of Steel from Time Warner's (NYSE:TWX) Warner Bros. studio has had more than its share of criticism regarding casting choices. With the most recent news about the film, it seems that things aren't going to change any time soon. After weeks of rumor and speculation tossing out everyone from Bryan Cranston and Joaquin Phoenix to Denzel Washington as potentially being courted for the role, the upcoming "Batman vs. Superman" film finally has its Lex Luthor.

Jesse Eisenberg, best known for films such as Zombieland, The Social Network, and Now You See Me, has been cast as Superman's archenemy in the 2016 film. Reactions have been mixed, with some fans decrying the casting as worthy of ridicule while others are excited to see what Eisenberg brings to the film.

Eisenberg's casting wasn't the only "Batman vs. Superman" announcement made recently, however; it was also revealed that Jeremy Irons would play Alfred Pennyworth, Batman/Bruce Wayne's faithful butler who was most recently played by Michael Caine in Christopher Nolan's "Dark Knight" trilogy.

What this tells us
Though there have been questions raised by some of Warner's casting decisions for "Batman vs. Superman," there are a few hints about the film's direction that we can pick up from the choices that the casting directors have made. Keep in mind that this is ignoring rumors such as the "U.N. Justice League" and other claims that have been made about the film, since even Eisenberg's casting shows that rumors don't always bear fruit.

Eisenberg's casting shows that the film will feature a younger Lex Luthor. This is similar to how the character was portrayed by Michael Rosenbaum in "Smallville," putting him similar in age to Superman instead of being an older character as many of the rumors had him pegged. Given Luthor's skill with technology and Eisenberg's age, it's possible that this version of Lex will be an opportunistic tech-industry whiz kid; I wouldn't be overly surprised to see the producers draw influence from the likes of Steve Jobs or Mark Zuckerberg for the new Lex because of the younger age at which they came to prominence.

As for Jeremy Irons' casting as Alfred, it hints that the producers still want a strong English actor to portray the character. Irons is a classically trained actor who has been in the London theatre since 1969 and has won Emmys, a Tony, Golden Globes, Screen Actors Guild Awards, and even an Oscar for his acting work. Of course, he also starred in Dungeons and Dragons and Eragon, so he isn't above making bad movies every once in a while.

It's possible that "Batman vs. Superman" will feature a slightly more action-oriented, Alfred similar to the character's portrayal in the animated series "Beware the Batman" and occasionally in the comics, though any action scenes would likely be very limited to keep the focus on the main protagonists.

Is this a good sign?
As more casting choices are announced, we're getting a slightly better view of the direction that Warner Bros. is going with the Man of Steel sequel.

The choice of Israeli Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman, for example, shows that the film will portray the character a bit closer to her origins -- though she would have been closer to Greek than Israeli, the casting still differentiates her from the standard "American" portrayal that's been seen on screen.

Even the much-maligned casting of Ben Affleck as Batman hints that the character might be a more intellectual character than action-oriented -- Affleck isn't exactly known for his action roles, and action-based roles such as Daredevil and Reindeer Games are frequently cited among his worst films.

The casting of Irons and Eisenberg may have been done to add a bit more credibility to the project, especially in the case of Irons, as it will give Affleck a strong actor to play off of, similar to how Christian Bale's Batman was tempered and guided by Michael Caine's and Morgan Freeman's characters.

It's also similar to the direction that Disney's (NYSE:DIS) Marvel Studios has taken with the supporting casting for its films, with actors such as Anthony Hopkins, Robert Redford, Glenn Close, and most recently Michael Douglas taking roles in Marvel superhero films.

The cinematic showdown
With over two years between now and when the "Batman vs. Superman" film is slated to hit theaters, there's still a lot of speculation ahead as to what the final movie will be. It also remains to be seen whether Warner Bros. will hold fast to its May 6 release date, since Marvel Studios shows no signs of backing off with the unannounced film that it also has scheduled for the date.

Warner needs a solid hit with this film as it will be the launching point of a larger cinematic universe. Without it, the gap between its DC Comics movies and the shared Marvel Studios universe will grow even wider. While some of the early casting choices for the film were questionable, the addition of Eisenberg and Irons has renewed the faith of some fans and has them interested in where the project is headed.

The next step
Want to figure out how to profit on business analysis like this? The key is to learn how to turn business insights into portfolio gold by taking your first steps as an investor. Those who wait on the sidelines are missing out on huge gains and putting their financial futures in jeopardy. In our brand-new special report, "Your Essential Guide to Start Investing Today," The Motley Fool's personal-finance experts show you what you need to get started, and even gives you access to some stocks to buy first. Click here to get your copy today -- it's absolutely free.

John Casteele has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Walt Disney. The Motley Fool owns shares of Walt Disney. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information

Compare Brokers