Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



The 5 Least Tax-Friendly States for Running a Business

Don't let it get away!

Keep track of the stocks that matter to you.

Help yourself with the Fool's FREE and easy new watchlist service today.

Let's face it: None of us enjoys paying our taxes, but without this crucial economic component we simply wouldn't have money to employ our government officials, pay for our military, or offer government-sponsored social programs such as Social Security and Medicare, to name a few things.

However, as much as we'd like to believe as individuals that paying our taxes is painful, tax rates can actually be much more painful for businesses that can owe millions, or billions, in taxes each year. Consider technology giant Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL  ) , for example, which set aside $13.12 billion for income taxes in 2013 at an effective tax rate of 26.2%. This was amazingly down from the $14.03 billion it set aside in 2012.

All things considered, though, Apple's effective tax rate is nowhere near the peak corporate tax rate of 39.1%, which is 14% higher than the average corporate tax rate, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development for OECD countries. In other words, American corporations have quite the tax mountain to climb each and every year.

Source: Jarmoluk, Pixabay.

The five least tax-friendly states to run a business
Now here's the really interesting thing about tax rates: They can vary wildly by state. In this instance I'm talking about the varying combinations of corporate taxes, sales tax, individual income tax, unemployment insurance tax, and property taxes as well. "What does this mean for businesses?" you may be wondering. It means that states need to pick and choose where they incorporate wisely, as corporate taxes and taxes on local consumers can have a discernible impact on their overall performance.

If you think about it, states with high property and individual taxes could constrain consumer spending and discourage people to move to a particular state, while higher corporate taxes may discourage incorporation in that state.

Thankfully for us, the Tax Foundation recently released its findings (link opens a PDF, Table 4) as to which states stack up as the best and worst in terms of overall economic performance based on the aforementioned five tax categories, with lower numbers representing a more favorable state to operate in for businesses. Today, we're going to look at which states brought up the bottom of that list, discuss some of the factors that pushed them to the caboose, and suggest a few ways this information could make us smarter investors.

Without further ado, here are the five least tax-friendly states to run a business:


Overall Index Rank

Corp. Tax

Indiv. Income Tax

Sales Tax

Unemp. Ins. Tax

Property Tax

New York







New Jersey





















Rhode Island







Source: Tax Foundation, states are ranked 1-50 where lower numbers are more favorable, based on 2013 figures. 

Why these states rank at the bottom
Those states consistently rank toward the bottom in a number of key categories that would discourage business incorporation or consumer spending.

Source: Eli Christman, Flickr.

For instance, with the exception of California, we have four of the worst six offenders listed with regard to the highest property taxes in America. Remember, both individuals and businesses have to pay property taxes. Higher property taxes lessen consumers' disposable income and could reduce a company's ability to expand and hire.

These states are also notorious offenders when it comes to individual incomes taxes, with four of the bottom five states represented, the exception being Rhode Island. Similar to property taxes, more money out of consumers' pockets means less opportunity for businesses to market to local consumers.

With the exception of New York, which has taken aggressive steps to maintain lower corporate tax rates and has offered new business that'll incorporate in the state tax-free status for 10 years, the remaining four states -- New Jersey, California, Vermont, and Rhode Island -- all rank in the bottom 11 in terms of highest corporate tax rates.

How knowing these facts can help you invest better
I admit that I'm a numbers guy who loves to seek out obscure facts. This instance is also one of those cases where the interesting and obscure facts could also serve to help us invest better.

Take investment banking giant Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS  ) as a good example. Although Goldman Sachs has offices around the world, it's based out of New York, the least-friendly overall state based on the Tax Foundation's rankings, employing about 25% of its global workforce in the state. You'd certainly be hard-pressed to say that Goldman Sachs is struggling, having earned $7.7 billion in net income in 2013, but it still paid 31.5% of its pre-tax earnings ($3.7 billion) to taxes, as well as another $839 million in occupancy expenses (rent, utilities, and so on). If Goldman weren't so tied to Wall Street's surroundings, it could likely save itself tens, if not hundreds, of millions of dollars by incorporating in another state.

Another company that can partially suffer from this tax bias is grocery chain Weis Markets (NYSE: WMK  ) , which is based in Pennsylvania, but operates grocery stores throughout New Jersey and New York. As you can see from the data, New York and New Jersey have some of the highest sales tax rates out of the 50 states, which is something that can discourage shoppers from spending more. With the grocery business running on already razor-thin margins, it's conceivable that the lesser-favorable tax situation in the Northeast could hold Weis' growth capabilities back.

Although I'd be reluctant to suggest that you base an investment decision on a cumulative tax rates paid, it can give you a good idea of where corporate money is headed and give you those little edges that can take you from being a good investor and transform you into an extraordinary one.

Is Uncle Sam about to claim 40% of your hard-earned assets?
Thanks to a 2013 law called the American Taxpayer Relief Act, or ATRA, he can -- and will -- if you aren't properly prepared.

Fortunately, The Motley Fool recently uncovered an arsenal of little-known loopholes to protect yourself from ATRA and help keep the taxman at bay when he inevitably comes calling. We reveal them all in a brand-new special report. Simply click the following link for instant, 100% free access.

Protect my hard-earned wealth from Uncle Sam

Read/Post Comments (11) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 09, 2014, at 2:51 PM, tommy779 wrote:

    Number 6 , 7 and 8 ------Illinoiswillhole.

  • Report this Comment On February 09, 2014, at 3:25 PM, bigfoot wrote:

    I dont know about the other states mentioned but in Calif. there is a fee also attached to everything a business does. And this includes a lot of inspections. Now not only do we pay taxes to run these various state and county depts. but now they charge for the inspections they do.

  • Report this Comment On February 09, 2014, at 4:05 PM, HerbVonDiesel wrote:

    two sets of books. end of problem.

  • Report this Comment On February 09, 2014, at 4:23 PM, comosichiam wrote:

    And the real irony is for the most part they are gun control places so you pay through the nose to live and work in these paradises and protecting yourself and your family is generally frowned on. Sorry sport screw with me and mine you get to see Jesus early.

  • Report this Comment On February 09, 2014, at 6:19 PM, nihonbarb wrote:

    California suffers from democrats, especially the liberal dolts that service the sphinctors of the unions. California has more taxes, fees and EPA costs than surely any other state. When the state is burdened with Feinstein, Pelosi, Boxer and Moon Beam, it is no wonder businesses and people with money are saying Adios to Mexifornia, land of high taxes to support illegal aliens and union parasites!

  • Report this Comment On February 09, 2014, at 6:57 PM, CQMckay wrote:

    What really stinks is that California and New York carry almost 90 electoral vote which is about one third of what it takes to elect a president and they are the most out of touch broke liberal idiots in the U.S.! Not all of them are of course but there are enough of them that they out vote the sane ones so the ones with some sense don't matter.

  • Report this Comment On February 09, 2014, at 7:46 PM, mridenhour wrote:

    But don't fail to acknowledge that California and New York aren't the poorest states or the states with the highest obesity rate or the states with the highest number of high school dropouts and fewest number of college degrees, and teenage mothers and the lowest wages. That belongs to states like Mississippi and neighboring Southern states that all they have to comfort themselves with is their sincere ignorance, love of guns, and a trip to Walmart now and then to buy generic cigarettes.

  • Report this Comment On February 09, 2014, at 7:58 PM, paintrain1 wrote:

    All blue states

  • Report this Comment On February 09, 2014, at 11:30 PM, altmd71 wrote:

    I have no problem acknowledging that California and New York are much "richer" than the states of the deep south but I have to tell you that my money goes much further here and the quality of life is much better than anywhere else I've lived in the north or west, except maybe Colorado. The "fly-over" part of the US between the east and west coast is alive and well I can assure you.

  • Report this Comment On February 10, 2014, at 10:43 AM, inreality01 wrote:

    No shock here, these states have been heavily influenced by leftist policies for decades.

    Minnesota and Illinois are clearly up there as well.

  • Report this Comment On February 10, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Scottilla wrote:

    New York, New Jersey, California... No rich people there!

    Maybe there is a reason to go into business in a rich state?

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2829740, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/30/2015 6:10:30 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Sean Williams

A Fool since 2010, and a graduate from UC San Diego with a B.A. in Economics, Sean specializes in the healthcare sector and in investment planning topics. You'll usually find him writing about Obamacare, marijuana, developing drugs, diagnostics, and medical devices, Social Security, taxes, or any number of other macroeconomic issues.

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 16,643.01 -11.76 -0.07%
S&P 500 1,988.87 1.21 0.06%
NASD 4,828.33 15.62 0.32%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

8/28/2015 4:00 PM
AAPL $113.29 Up +0.37 +0.33%
Apple CAPS Rating: ****
GS $187.75 Down -0.81 -0.43%
Goldman Sachs CAPS Rating: ***
WMK $40.51 Down -0.07 -0.17%
Weis Markets, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****