The 5 Least Tax-Friendly States for Running a Business

Based on a report from the Tax Foundation studying five separate types of taxes, these five states were considered to be the least friendly for businesses.

Feb 9, 2014 at 10:35AM

Let's face it: None of us enjoys paying our taxes, but without this crucial economic component we simply wouldn't have money to employ our government officials, pay for our military, or offer government-sponsored social programs such as Social Security and Medicare, to name a few things.

However, as much as we'd like to believe as individuals that paying our taxes is painful, tax rates can actually be much more painful for businesses that can owe millions, or billions, in taxes each year. Consider technology giant Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), for example, which set aside $13.12 billion for income taxes in 2013 at an effective tax rate of 26.2%. This was amazingly down from the $14.03 billion it set aside in 2012.

All things considered, though, Apple's effective tax rate is nowhere near the peak corporate tax rate of 39.1%, which is 14% higher than the average corporate tax rate, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development for OECD countries. In other words, American corporations have quite the tax mountain to climb each and every year.

Money Bills Calculator
Source: Jarmoluk, Pixabay.

The five least tax-friendly states to run a business
Now here's the really interesting thing about tax rates: They can vary wildly by state. In this instance I'm talking about the varying combinations of corporate taxes, sales tax, individual income tax, unemployment insurance tax, and property taxes as well. "What does this mean for businesses?" you may be wondering. It means that states need to pick and choose where they incorporate wisely, as corporate taxes and taxes on local consumers can have a discernible impact on their overall performance.

If you think about it, states with high property and individual taxes could constrain consumer spending and discourage people to move to a particular state, while higher corporate taxes may discourage incorporation in that state.

Thankfully for us, the Tax Foundation recently released its findings (link opens a PDF, Table 4) as to which states stack up as the best and worst in terms of overall economic performance based on the aforementioned five tax categories, with lower numbers representing a more favorable state to operate in for businesses. Today, we're going to look at which states brought up the bottom of that list, discuss some of the factors that pushed them to the caboose, and suggest a few ways this information could make us smarter investors.

Without further ado, here are the five least tax-friendly states to run a business:


Overall Index Rank

Corp. Tax

Indiv. Income Tax

Sales Tax

Unemp. Ins. Tax

Property Tax

New York







New Jersey





















Rhode Island







Source: Tax Foundation, states are ranked 1-50 where lower numbers are more favorable, based on 2013 figures. 

Why these states rank at the bottom
Those states consistently rank toward the bottom in a number of key categories that would discourage business incorporation or consumer spending.

Taxes Too High

Source: Eli Christman, Flickr.

For instance, with the exception of California, we have four of the worst six offenders listed with regard to the highest property taxes in America. Remember, both individuals and businesses have to pay property taxes. Higher property taxes lessen consumers' disposable income and could reduce a company's ability to expand and hire.

These states are also notorious offenders when it comes to individual incomes taxes, with four of the bottom five states represented, the exception being Rhode Island. Similar to property taxes, more money out of consumers' pockets means less opportunity for businesses to market to local consumers.

With the exception of New York, which has taken aggressive steps to maintain lower corporate tax rates and has offered new business that'll incorporate in the state tax-free status for 10 years, the remaining four states -- New Jersey, California, Vermont, and Rhode Island -- all rank in the bottom 11 in terms of highest corporate tax rates.

How knowing these facts can help you invest better
I admit that I'm a numbers guy who loves to seek out obscure facts. This instance is also one of those cases where the interesting and obscure facts could also serve to help us invest better.

Take investment banking giant Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) as a good example. Although Goldman Sachs has offices around the world, it's based out of New York, the least-friendly overall state based on the Tax Foundation's rankings, employing about 25% of its global workforce in the state. You'd certainly be hard-pressed to say that Goldman Sachs is struggling, having earned $7.7 billion in net income in 2013, but it still paid 31.5% of its pre-tax earnings ($3.7 billion) to taxes, as well as another $839 million in occupancy expenses (rent, utilities, and so on). If Goldman weren't so tied to Wall Street's surroundings, it could likely save itself tens, if not hundreds, of millions of dollars by incorporating in another state.

Another company that can partially suffer from this tax bias is grocery chain Weis Markets (NYSE:WMK), which is based in Pennsylvania, but operates grocery stores throughout New Jersey and New York. As you can see from the data, New York and New Jersey have some of the highest sales tax rates out of the 50 states, which is something that can discourage shoppers from spending more. With the grocery business running on already razor-thin margins, it's conceivable that the lesser-favorable tax situation in the Northeast could hold Weis' growth capabilities back.

Although I'd be reluctant to suggest that you base an investment decision on a cumulative tax rates paid, it can give you a good idea of where corporate money is headed and give you those little edges that can take you from being a good investor and transform you into an extraordinary one.

Is Uncle Sam about to claim 40% of your hard-earned assets?
Thanks to a 2013 law called the American Taxpayer Relief Act, or ATRA, he can -- and will -- if you aren't properly prepared.

Fortunately, The Motley Fool recently uncovered an arsenal of little-known loopholes to protect yourself from ATRA and help keep the taxman at bay when he inevitably comes calling. We reveal them all in a brand-new special report. Simply click the following link for instant, 100% free access.

Protect my hard-earned wealth from Uncle Sam

Sean Williams has no material interest in any companies mentioned in this article. You can follow him on CAPS under the screen name TMFUltraLong, track every pick he makes under the screen name TrackUltraLong, and check him out on Twitter, where he goes by the handle @TMFUltraLong.

The Motley Fool owns shares of, and recommends Apple. It also recommends Goldman Sachs. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information