Is AMD's Mantle a Game Changer?

AMD's new graphics API, Mantle, is finally supported in Battlefield 4, and the first benchmarks show that, while impressive, the technology is no game changer for AMD. Intel's CPUs are fast enough that most of Mantle's optimizations don't have much of an effect, and convincing developers to support the API will be difficult.

Feb 12, 2014 at 10:30AM

Last year, AMD (NASDAQ:AMD) announced that it would be releasing a new graphics API called Mantle as an alternative to Microsoft's DirectX. Most PC games are built using DirectX, which is Windows-only, but AMD promised that Mantle would introduce substantial performance gains by removing overhead inherent in Microsoft's API. The first game to support Mantle is Electronic Arts' Battlefield 4, and after some delays, the first benchmarks are finally available. Does Mantle live up to the hype? More important, what does it mean for investors in AMD and its competitors, like Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA)?

A performance rundown
Without getting too technical, a modern PC game works in two steps. First, the CPU updates the game state, dealing with user input, determining where objects in the game world need to be, etc. Then, the GPU takes that information and draws it on the screen. But the CPU needs to tell the GPU what to draw, and this process involves a significant amount of overhead. One of Mantle's biggest selling points is making this process more efficient, freeing the CPU from much of this burden.

Mantle also includes other optimizations on the GPU side, allowing for performance gains there, as well. The initial benchmarks from AnandTech, which are based on beta software and are not final, show that Mantle provides big performance gains in certain situations, with small performance gains otherwise.

In a nutshell, when a high-end GPU like AMD's Radeon R290X is paired with a powerful processor, like Intel's high-end offerings, the performance gains of Mantle compared to DirectX are minimal, between 7%-10%. In this case, the CPU is fast enough that the bulk of Mantle's optimizations don't matter much in the grand scheme of things. When a slower processor is used with the same high-end GPU, the performance gains are much larger, around 30% or so. In this case, the CPU is the bottleneck, and Mantle's optimizations are more meaningful.

What this means for AMD, Intel, and NVIDIA
The largest performance gains for Mantle came from the most unlikely scenario -- a high-end GPU combined with a low-end CPU. Pairing a $500-plus GPU with a cheap CPU doesn't make much since, since the CPU would prevent the full potential of the GPU from being realized, and using a higher-end CPU eliminates much of Mantle's performance gain.

The conclusion here is that Mantle won't have too much of an impact on the high-end GPU market. The 7%-10% boost that Mantle gives AMD's highest-end GPUs is nice, but it's not enough of an improvement to give NVIDIA a reason to worry. And since support for Mantle has to be built into each game in order to take advantage of these improvements, a single-digit performance boost may not be enough to convince developers to support the API.

NVIDIA is expected to release GPUs built on a new graphics architecture Maxwell sometime this month, and significant performance improvements over the previous architecture are likely. NVIDIA has been one step ahead of AMD in terms of performance for quite some time, with its nearly year-old GTX Titan claiming the top-performing GPU crown for the better part of a year before AMD released new GPUs. Maxwell should give NVIDIA a big lead in terms of performance, and Mantle doesn't seem to be able to close that gap.

Mantle may help AMD sell more CPUs, though, assuming developers support the API. If the trends from these benchmarks hold for lower-end GPUs, an AMD CPU paired with a mid-range or low-end GPU could potentially achieve a significant performance boost using Mantle. From a performance-per-dollar perspective, this setup may have a big advantage over a similarly priced Intel-NVIDIA gaming PC. The high-end CPU market should be unaffected, though, since Intel's i7 processors are fast enough, based on the benchmarks, that most of Mantle's optimizations don't increase performance by very much at all.

The bottom line
Although these benchmarks are very early, Mantle doesn't look like a game changer for AMD. The improvements over DirectX are impressive, but Mantle seems to disproportionally benefit lower-end PCs. For serious gaming PCs with high-end parts, the small improvements brought by Mantle likely aren't enough to pull customers away from NVIDIA. Cnvincing developers to support the API will prove difficult, at best. There's still room for these numbers to improve as AMD's Mantle drivers are refined, but it's unlikely that Mantle will ultimately live up to its promise.

The next big trend in tech is here, and you can profit
If you thought the iPod, the iPhone, and the iPad were amazing, just wait until you see this. One hundred of Apple's top engineers are busy building one in a secret lab. And an ABI Research report predicts 485 million of them could be sold over the next decade. But you can invest in it right now... for just a fraction of the price of AAPL stock. Click here to get the full story in this eye-opening new report.

Timothy Green owns shares of Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends Intel and Nvidia. The Motley Fool owns shares of Intel. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information