The Biggest Loser: Don’t Blame the Messenger

The Biggest Loser winner showed how The Biggest Loser contest misaligned with The Biggest Loser brand and delivered a lesson in the dangers of letting branding "sleeping dogs" lie.

Feb 15, 2014 at 9:42AM

When Rachel Frederickson took the stage for The Biggest Loser finale, she unveiled a rail-thin, 105-pound frame that took my breath away. Her weight loss, product of months of work, won her the program's quarter-million dollar prize. The trainers clapped and smiled, but barely covered their surprise – or was that shock – at seeing how far the contestant had carried her efforts. Indeed, a photo that seemed to capture distress on the faces of trainers Bob Harper and Jillian Michaels went viral by morning. All in all, viewers of Comcast (NASDAQ:CMCSA) subsidiary NBC were left feeling a little confused.

The media was abuzz, describing Rachel's result with headlines that included, "Too Thin," "Stunning," and "Uncomfortable." The press claimed Rachel was too slender "even by Hollywood standards" and questioned whether the show had gone "too far." And yet, despite my sincere hope that Rachel was healthy despite the hullaballoo, I couldn't help but think – wait – she was, after all, "in it to win it." We asked her to lose as many pounds as she could, and this is exactly what this determined competitor did.

The Biggest Loser brand

Over the past 10 years, The Biggest Loser has built a formidable healthy-lifestyle brand. When rolling out the program's Season 15 sponsors, Monica Austin, SVP of business and brand development for program producer Shine America, described The Biggest Loser's mission as an "on-going effort to fight obesity, providing our brand partners with a creative multi-platform experience to authentically communicate their messages."

Season 15's sponsors included Jennie-O by Hormel (NYSE:HRL), Planet Fitness, Brita Water Filters, Ford (NYSE:F), Subway, and General Mills (NYSE:GIS). Said Austin, these "partners have played an integral role in making 'The Biggest Loser' a respected brand that both educates and inspires our viewers to get active and live healthier lives."

Given all this, it's not hard to imagine the collective "uh-oh" that went on behind the scenes when the program's big reveal played as "Too skinny!" rather than "How healthy!"

A branding disconnect

I believe The Biggest Loser has been sitting on an indefensible crack in its branding armor that just showed itself in a big way live on prime time TV. The contest is not about who can come closest to his or her ideal body weight without going under – it's about who can lose the most weight. This potentially dangerous branding disconnect has been there all along; it just took a fierce competitor in the form of Rachel Frederickson to show it to the viewing audience.

Throughout the seasons, contestants have posted one-week losses that could easily be regarded as alarming, and yet, perhaps because they were within the protective cocoon of the ranch by individuals still well above an ideal weight, we cheered their success. Somehow watching contestants work so hard they would vomit, cry, and fall down made for compelling television, perhaps because the show followed them as they moved beyond that struggle to appear fit and healthy. Prior to what has turned out to be the "stress test" of Season 15, The Biggest Loser looked to have perfected its brand recipe.

Loser by the numbers

Rachel would have needed to finish the contest with a BMI of 18.5 in order to have been classified as healthy by the CDC with her 5'4" frame (at least 108 pounds); instead, she finished with a BMI of 18 (105 pounds). Just 3 more pounds, and charges of being below a healthy BMI would not have applied. With a quarter-million dollar prize on the table, it is easy to understand why she would push to get her weight as low as possible for the finale.

This is especially true given that Rachel's two competitors for the prize were men. Runner-up David Brown stood 6'2" and began the competition at 409 pounds. By CDC standards, he could have shrunk all the way to 144 pounds before being declared underweight. This feat would have resulted in a loss of 64.79%, and would have beat Rachel's 59.62% accomplishment by a huge margin. In order to assure her success, it may be that Rachel needed to risk pushing the healthy envelope.

Changes in the works?

As of this writing, rumors are swirling about "tweaks" to The Biggest Loser format for upcoming seasons. Viewers, sponsors, and trainers love the "get healthy" message, we want to see people succeed. But I think Rachel has delivered a reminder to the program producers that getting healthy and losing as much weight as humanly possible as fast as possible are not always one and the same. Some brand messaging repair is no doubt in order for The Biggest Loser.

The next step for you

Want to figure out how to profit on business analysis like this? The key is to learn how to turn business insights into portfolio gold by taking your first steps as an investor. Those who wait on the sidelines are missing out on huge gains and putting their financial futures in jeopardy. In our brand-new special report, "Your Essential Guide to Start Investing Today," The Motley Fool's personal finance experts show you what you need to get started, and even give you access to some stocks to buy first. Click here to get your copy today -- it's absolutely free.

Beth Nichols owns shares of Ford. The Motley Fool recommends Ford. The Motley Fool owns shares of Ford. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Money to your ears - A great FREE investing resource for you

The best way to get your regular dose of market and money insights is our suite of free podcasts ... what we like to think of as “binge-worthy finance.”

Feb 1, 2016 at 5:03PM

Whether we're in the midst of earnings season or riding out the market's lulls, you want to know the best strategies for your money.

And you'll want to go beyond the hype of screaming TV personalities, fear-mongering ads, and "analysis" from people who might have your email address ... but no track record of success.

In short, you want a voice of reason you can count on.

A 2015 Business Insider article titled, "11 websites to bookmark if you want to get rich," rated The Motley Fool as the #1 place online to get smarter about investing.

And one of the easiest, most enjoyable, most valuable ways to get your regular dose of market and money insights is our suite of free podcasts ... what we like to think of as "binge-worthy finance."

Whether you make it part of your daily commute or you save up and listen to a handful of episodes for your 50-mile bike rides or long soaks in a bubble bath (or both!), the podcasts make sense of your money.

And unlike so many who want to make the subjects of personal finance and investing complicated and scary, our podcasts are clear, insightful, and (yes, it's true) fun.

Our free suite of podcasts

Motley Fool Money features a team of our analysts discussing the week's top business and investing stories, interviews, and an inside look at the stocks on our radar. The show is also heard weekly on dozens of radio stations across the country.

The hosts of Motley Fool Answers challenge the conventional wisdom on life's biggest financial issues to reveal what you really need to know to make smart money moves.

David Gardner, co-founder of The Motley Fool, is among the most respected and trusted sources on investing. And he's the host of Rule Breaker Investing, in which he shares his insights into today's most innovative and disruptive companies ... and how to profit from them.

Market Foolery is our daily look at stocks in the news, as well as the top business and investing stories.

And Industry Focus offers a deeper dive into a specific industry and the stories making headlines. Healthcare, technology, energy, consumer goods, and other industries take turns in the spotlight.

They're all informative, entertaining, and eminently listenable. Rule Breaker Investing and Answers are timeless, so it's worth going back to and listening from the very start; the other three are focused more on today's events, so listen to the most recent first.

All are available for free at www.fool.com/podcasts.

If you're looking for a friendly voice ... with great advice on how to make the most of your money ... from a business with a lengthy track record of success ... in clear, compelling language ... I encourage you to give a listen to our free podcasts.

Head to www.fool.com/podcasts, give them a spin, and you can subscribe there (at iTunes, Stitcher, or our other partners) if you want to receive them regularly.

It's money to your ears.

 


Compare Brokers