Investors' Biggest Misconception About Obamacare

By the numbers, Obamacare has failed to live up to its billing thus far, at least in the eyes of more than half of Americans.

Opposition to this transformative health law is at or near an all-time high, and total enrollments of 3.3 million people are tracking below the targeted 7 million offered up by the Department of Health and Human Services before the state and federal marketplace exchanges were launched on October 1. Furthermore, a plethora of deadline delays have eroded the urgency needed to get young adults and the currently uninsured to sign up prior to the March 31 coverage cutoff for obtaining health insurance in 2014.

Looking in all the wrong places
In spite of these figures and a number of heated exchanges between Obamacare proponents and opponents, one gigantic misconception about this law is still prevailing. This "biggest misconception," as I like to call it, is none other than the belief that Obamacare could wreak havoc on U.S. health insurers' profits, and that Obamacare will be a make-or-break program for our national insurers.

There is, in some small context, truth to this statement -- but not really for the reasons you're probably thinking of.

The traditional view of Obamacare proponents and skeptics is that few young adults will sign up for health insurance, causing insurers, which are now required under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to accept citizens that have preexisting conditions, to pay much more out of their own pockets. As these medical expenses rise, insurers' profits will fall.

However, I'd interject that insurers' profits could fall for a number of other reasons. Perhaps the largest of those reasons is simply health-care sector uncertainty. No one really understands how Obamacare is going to directly affect hospitals or insurers yet, so hospitals have been a bit tighter with their spending on new equipment, and insurers have been a bit less enthusiastic about approving expensive surgeries for patients or prescribing branded medication. This ripple effect of expense-holstering has a negative effect on much of the sector, including insurers.

Obamacare's biggest misconception
Perhaps the biggest misconception for investors with regard to Obamacare is that individual exchange enrollment represents a big chunk of revenue to insurers. With the exception of WellPoint (NYSE: WLP  ) , which purchased Amerigroup for $4.5 billion last year and purposely targeted as many new enrollees as possible, Obamacare enrollment represents but a blip for most national insurers.

As my Foolish colleague and health care analyst David Williamson pointed out recently, CIGNA (NYSE: CI  ) and Aetna (NYSE: AET  ) have only witnessed approximately 20,000 and 200,000 enrollees from Obamacare -- and they're both admittedly losing money from the exchange, which again is not surprising given the high levels of uncertainty abounding. To add context to these figures, Aetna's revenue exposure to the exchange is just a mere 3%, and CIGNA's is even less than that. Yet, for all intents and purposes, investors appear ready to knock down the gates with fire and pitchforks in hand because Aetna and CIGNA are cautious about their near-term growth.

Source: Tax Credits on Flickr.

The truth of the matter is that Aetna and CIGNA can comfortably deal with losses in their relatively small Obamacare segments because of three factors.

One, the percentage of revenue generated from Obamacare doesn't perfectly correlate with the percentage of impact witnessed in these companies' bottom lines. All things considered, Aetna's Obamacare enrollment, which comprised 3% of its revenue, only has a plus or minus 1% effect on its EPS. What we're really talking about here is just a few pennies in EPS at most.

Two, these insurers derive a majority of their income from the commercial side of the business. This is why we saw a number of big-name insurers, such as CIGNA, Aetna, and UnitedHealth Group (NYSE: UNH  ) drop out of competitive marketplaces such as California in May of last year, because it's not worth fighting incumbent insurers in those states for what amounts to a low single-digit, and still relatively uncertain, revenue stream.

Finally, provisions built into Obamacare's reinsurance fund protect insurers against steep losses. If an insurers' medical expense ratio tops 108% -- meaning it spends $1.08 or more in medical costs for every $1 in premium it brings in -- a reinsurance fund kicks in that provides a failsafe subsidy to the insurer, thus encouraging it to remain on the exchange.

Stay the course
If you're an investor in national insurers like CIGNA, Aetna, and UnitedHealth Group, my suggestion would be to stop worrying so much about these initial enrollment figures and instead focus on what these companies do best, which is move premium pricing to their advantage and grow the commercial side of their business.

At 10, 10, and 12 times forward earnings, respectively, CIGNA, Aetna, and UnitedHealth Group are still in control of their premium pricing and are producing healthy profits. Once the uncertainty around Obamacare clears, these companies, whether they remain a part of Obamacare's exchanges or drop out as Aetna has threatened to do under the right conditions, could become targets for value-seeking investors.

Still trying to figure out the big picture of how Obamacare will affect you? Let us help!
Obamacare seems complex, but it doesn't have to be. In only minutes, you can learn the critical facts you need to know in a special free report called "Everything You Need to Know About Obamacare." This FREE guide contains the key information and money-making advice that every American must know. Please click here to access your free copy.


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 19, 2014, at 3:18 PM, HoosierRube wrote:

    This 'reporter' is totally ignoring the most important fact.

    The law has not been implemented in its entirety. In fact, the largest single item in this law, The Employer Mandate, has been postponed so often that this blogger has plum forgot all about it.

    The worry is, and always has been, how will employers react. And, if they react by saying, 'Fine, we'll send all of our employees to the government exchanges and wash our hands of this mess.' Then indeed, there will be a mass washout of insurance providers.

    I wish these bloggers would call a spade a spade and recognize this is little more than a mass expansion of Medicaid.

    If you have ever been a Medicaid patient, you should tell people what that's like. I had a family member that was thrown into that inhumane barrel of human degradation and neglect. Trust me when I say, 'You don't want to go there'.

  • Report this Comment On February 19, 2014, at 8:28 PM, malclave wrote:

    I think the biggest misconception is that some people seem to think that Obamacare is supposed to actually function.

    It's just a stepping stone to single payer.

  • Report this Comment On February 19, 2014, at 10:38 PM, classic216 wrote:

    It's about to become mandatory for employers to offer health insurance, it's now mandatory for individuals to buy health insurance.......combined with the aging baby boomer population......spells a very bright future for the health care and pharma sector.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2842190, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/22/2014 2:19:22 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement