Russia Is Losing Its Leverage

Compared to other emerging markets struggling in the recent bout of instability, Moscow appears to be in an enviable financial position. The country is not heavily dependent on foreign loans, and earnings from energy exports have bolstered the state's fiscal health. In fact, some analysts suggest that the decline of the ruble to record levels against the dollar-euro basket in the last few weeks might further boost oil and gas exports, facilitating a current account surplus.

However, the long-term outlook for the Russian state could not be more precarious. The lack of diversity in the Russian economy means that even small fluctuations in its energy exports will seriously impact the fiscal health of the state as a whole. While this had not been a serious problem for Russian energy exporters in the last two decades, events in the past few months show that Russia's long-standing commercial ties with its resource-scarce clients in Europe and Asia are shifting.

The European front
The European Union has been taking significant steps toward diversifying its energy suppliers in the last few years, hoping that the reduced dependence on Russia's natural gas will also diminish Moscow's leverage over key political issues in Eastern Europe. Pursuant of this goal, a consortium of energy companies led by BP (NYSE: BP  ) is spearheading development of natural gas in Azerbaijan's Shah Deniz gas field along with a pipeline to deliver the output through Turkey. With full blessings from Russophobe European states, this project is undoubtedly going to be facilitated by both finances and political capital.

This is bad news for Gazprom (NASDAQOTH: OGZPY  ) , which supplies Russian natural gas to the European Union. Internal corruption and waste abetted by ties to President Vladimir Putin aside, the very identity of Gazprom as a supplier of Russian gas is now playing to the benefit of its rival developers in Western Europe.

Further weakening the company's position as the preeminent regional supplier, the ongoing civil unrest in Ukraine has become a major obstacle to Gazprom's ability to deliver gas. With the anti-government protests preventing Kiev from collecting taxes or the utility bill from its citizens, Ukrainian energy firm Naftogas has been left unable to pay Gazprom. As the single-largest importer of Russian natural gas, Ukraine's default has a huge impact on Gazprom's operations. For now, Moscow is forcing Gazprom to accept deferments in the import bill, but this cannot last forever. While Moscow's financial assistance package to Kiev could resolve payment problems, if Ukrainian President Yanukovich accepts help from the Kremlin, it could prolong protests and further disrupt Naftogas' ability to service imports.

Meanwhile, signs of disruptions in Gazprom's key transit state will only further accelerate Western European energy firms' drive to supply the region with alternative supplies.

With the resolution of the crisis in Ukraine unforeseeable in the near future, Gazprom's short-term prospects look increasingly fragile; and with European energy firms pursuing diversification by tapping reserves in the Eastern Mediterranean and elsewhere, the company's long-term prospects in Europe are under serious threat.  

The Asian front
Adding to Gazprom's headaches, the critical pipeline deal with China remains stalled. Late last year, the company announced that it expected a deal with China to be finalized by January 2014. Now, both Gazprom and China National Petroleum Corp. have agreed to push back the negotiations to May when President Vladimir Putin is expected to visit China.

Beijing continues to delay finalizing the deal because it feels Russia's natural gas prices could go lower, especially given how shale gas production in the United States is boosting global supply. But from Gazprom's perspective, with net earnings down, its export prices are already at their lower limit. Unfortunately for Gazprom, with China exploring natural gas options in Central Asia and West Africa, the company's leverage will only grow weaker as negotiations drag on.

To make matters worse, Japan may be cutting its imports as early as this summer. Yoichi Masuzoe, who strongly advocated for the reopening of the country's nuclear power plants, won the election for Tokyo governor. The controversial power plants, which provided nearly 30% of Japan's electricity needs prior to 2011, were closed down due to safety concerns following the meltdown at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. Since their closures, Japan had been increasing the import of natural gas from Russia to supplement energy production. However, the new governor is expected to restore operations to ten nuclear power plants by this summer, exercising the Tokyo metropolitan government's stake in Tokyo Electric Power.

With demand in Europe guaranteed to fall, Gazprom must establish long-term export contracts in East Asia soon to make itself viable. Unfortunately, that appears less and less likely as time goes on.

The prognosis
There was hope in 2013 that Moscow's abrogation of Gazprom's monopoly of natural gas exports would make the company more efficient. However, the events in Ukraine reveal how Gazprom is still intrinsically tied to Moscow's foreign policy aims. This not only diminishes the urgency within the company to eliminate its crippling waste and corruption, but also leaves clients deeply suspicious of Gazprom's intentions. As a consequence, Gazprom's European clients are actively seeking to diversify their supply of gas while Beijing believes that Moscow can lower Gazprom's gas prices for diplomatic capital. Neither of these outcomes are favorable for Gazprom.  

OPEC's nightmare is an energy investor's dream
Imagine a company that rents a very specific and valuable piece of machinery for $41,000... per hour (that's almost as much as the average American makes in a year!). And Warren Buffett is so confident in this company's can't-live-without-it business model, he just loaded up on 8.8 million shares. An exclusive, brand-new Motley Fool report reveals the company we're calling OPEC's Worst Nightmare. Just click HERE to uncover the name of this industry-leading stock... and join Buffett in his quest for a veritable LANDSLIDE of profits!

 


Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (5)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 19, 2014, at 1:13 PM, Richiedo wrote:

    My Question is Why?

    Why all this Western Phobia always directed towards the Russians who are excelling in the winter Olympics being conducted at their awesome Sochi achievement? Who have some the best IT Talent, arts, culture, overall beauty and exceptional sociability. So much to discover, see, enjoy and learn in Modern Day and young Russia. Many Westerners are forgetting this "Modern Day" status, and only express their wishes of "Old & Cumbersome" Russia so they see it as such. Leave it to the Russians to provide you with your valuable energy sources as they have been for decades, do not try to reinvent the wheel in unfamiliar and uncharted territories very familiar to the Russians!

  • Report this Comment On February 20, 2014, at 4:17 AM, amvet wrote:

    The western controlled media machine has waged an anti-Russian campaign for decades and a top target of this war has been Gazprom. The objective is to weaken Russia as much as possible. Naturally Russia has many problems, but is in great shape compared to the USA which has a massive trade deficit, a massive household deficit, dozens of cities on the verge of bankruptcy, over 1,000 out-of-country military bases to finance, and around 15 to 20 million illegal immigrants. By the way, Mr.Yong, the US shale oil and NG revolution is not what it is touted to be. Look at the details and learn.

  • Report this Comment On February 20, 2014, at 2:15 PM, GeorgePolitico02 wrote:

    Russia is in a condition not too different from the condition of the Weimar Republic in Germany, between the two world wars. The Germans at that time had lost a struggle for global dominance in which they were NOT entirely at fault, but for which they took the entire blame. Although the end of the struggle had been accompanied by hopes for a better era, those hopes had been cruelly dashed. Their economy was in shambles. Nouveau riche, who had obtained their wealth by criminality, flaunted it, while ordinary people went hungry. They had a large Communist party and, accordingly, many powerful people who would support any dictator who promised to protect them from Communism. They had a fear of encirclement, a distrust of diplomacy--which had usually failed them--and a belief in the military, which had generally been their salvation. They had lost much of their territory, and watched helplessly while people of their own ethnicity were mistreated in neighboring countries. They had a tradition of authoritarianism and anti-Semitism. They distrusted their government, which seemed able to do little for them.They saw the other major world powers as simultaneously weak and oppressive.<br><br>

    The Weimar Republic led to Hitler and the worst catastrophe in human history. We should be very careful not to induce modern Russia to follow the Weimar Republic's path. We can start by reconsidering the mindless Russia-bashing that is so frequent in the American press.

  • Report this Comment On February 20, 2014, at 9:33 PM, montty555 wrote:

    what's the first american solution?let's send arms to the protesters in the ukraine.russia is not our enemy.we are the enemy of peace.we export mayhem and terror to the world.maybe the u.s. could stay out of this?not likely!

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2844140, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/22/2014 6:58:48 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement