1 Stock With a Giant Dividend to Buy Today

If you ask any investor what the safest bank out there is, you'll likely hear one of two answers, Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC  ) or U.S. Bancorp (NYSE: USB  ) , yet it turns out one bank you may have never heard of is at the top of its class. That bank is New York Community Bancorp (NYSE: NYCB  ) .

Source: Dhaval Jani on Flickr.

At the end of 2013, New York Community Bancorp was the 41st largest financial institution in the United States, with just under $50 billion in assets. Although that certainly is big -- after all, Visa has $36 billion in assets -- New York Community Bancorp is only 13% of the size of U.S. Bancorp, and just 3% of the size of Wells Fargo. Yet despite its smaller size, there are three compelling reasons an investor should consider an investment in this regional bank and its 6.3% dividend.

1. Remarkable profitability
New York Community Bancorp is an interesting company because it predominantly operates in the multi-family lending arena -- apartments and the like -- in New York City. It has a total of 243 branches in New York, New Jersey, Ohio, Florida, and Arizona, but all 30 of its commercial bank branches reside in the metro New York area.

It leads its peers in its efficiency ratio -- which essentially measures the cost of each dollar of revenue -- and it also delivers solid returns:


Source: Company Investor Relations.

The company has had three acquisitions since 2009, and has added more than $11 billion in assets and almost that much in deposits. As a result, it has a sizable portion of goodwill on its balance sheet. Excluding for that, its adjusted return on average tangible stockholders' equity stands much higher, at 16.3%. When you consider its strong results, its relatively reasonable valuation, and high dividend, there is certainly a lot to like at first glance with New York Community Bancorp. 

2. Astounding safety
Beyond first glance, there is also the reality, as a result of the staggering losses that characterized banks in the most recent financial crisis, many investors have begun to question whether they should ever invest in a bank.

Yet through both the most recent financial crisis and the previous savings & loan crisis in the late 1980s and early 1990s, New York Community Bancorp has been resoundingly resilient:


Source: Company Investor Relations.

In fact, in the five-year period from 1989 to 1993, its total charge-offs stood at just 0.17%, versus an industry average of 5.4%, and the results were equally as impressive in the most recent financial crisis, with its charge-offs being 0.9% versus 11% seen by the industry. It has been one of the top banks at protecting itself from chasing risky returns in the name of short-term profits.

3. Incredible returns
Yet what is more remarkable than its ability to insulate itself against losses through its disciplined underwriting and prudent management is its ability to generate returns to shareholders. Through the appreciation of its stock and dividend payouts, the company has had a truly staggering total return on investment of 4,265% over the 20 years from its IPO in November of 1993 to the end of 2013. That compares to a 490% return on the S&P 500 and a 400% for the SNL Bank and Thrift Index. 

While past performance is no guarantee of future success, the results displayed by New York Community Bancorp over 20 years demonstrate its keen ability to protect both itself and shareholders from disastrous consequences of risky lending, which have generated astounding returns, and the signs point to this continuing for years to come.

Is New York Community Bancorp the best dividend stock you can buy?
New York Community Bancorp has been a home run for investors. But that is only half the battle. The other half is identifying which dividend stocks in particular are the best going forward. With this in mind, our top analysts put together a free list of nine high-yielding stocks that should be in every income investor's portfolio. To learn the identity of these stocks instantly and for free, all you have to do is click here now.


Read/Post Comments (6) | Recommend This Article (19)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 21, 2014, at 5:40 PM, dmiles2 wrote:

    I wonder if being so heavily weighted to properties in NYC might be a problem if NYC actually suffered a 1906 San Francisco-type disaster. Sandy was bad, but not like SF 1906.

  • Report this Comment On February 21, 2014, at 7:56 PM, cmalek wrote:

    @dmiles2:

    If you want to play that game, Wells Fargo will have a problem if the Big One shakes California and the West Coast. However, in either case, the survival of either bank will be of minor importance in comparison to the economic devastation in the region.

  • Report this Comment On February 21, 2014, at 9:37 PM, TradewindRider wrote:

    I see that NYCB hasn't raised its dividend since 2004, while its share price has fluctuated, so I'm not sure we're going to see the high overall returns continue. On the other hand, they kept their dividend stable throughout the recession, so they look pretty stable.

  • Report this Comment On February 21, 2014, at 10:27 PM, kgrahamprinter wrote:

    Am I reading the tables wrong - US Bancorp seems to be the most efficient with Wells perhaps the best combination of efficient and price to book value?

    How does that compare to Canadian Banks, none of which have gone bankrupt. Okay only 4% return but not regionally dependent either.

  • Report this Comment On February 22, 2014, at 11:22 AM, feenix1944 wrote:

    Let's see... paying 6.3% to shareholders, and paying, what, 1/2 of 1% to the people who put their money in the bank itself...

    This begs the question: What's wrong with this picture?

  • Report this Comment On February 22, 2014, at 11:42 AM, TMFMorris wrote:

    @kgrahamprinter -- I'm not so sure of the Canadian banks offhand, so I cannot speak to them. Efficiency ratio essentially measures the cost of generating each dollar of revenue, so the lower it is, the better.

    Best,

    Patrick

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 2845891, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 7/24/2014 5:25:39 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement